All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/17] drm/i915: Nuke skl wm.dirty_pipes bitmask
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:47:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120174728.21095-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120174728.21095-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

The dirty_pipes bitmask is now unused. Get rid of it.

Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 35 +--------------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 5bd40184ddee..a7f6275a79e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -803,7 +803,6 @@ struct skl_ddb_allocation {
 };
 
 struct skl_ddb_values {
-	unsigned dirty_pipes;
 	struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index edd62367006d..811e55e53b39 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5094,23 +5094,6 @@ static bool skl_plane_wm_equals(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	return skl_wm_level_equals(&wm1->trans_wm, &wm2->trans_wm);
 }
 
-static bool skl_pipe_wm_equals(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
-			       const struct skl_pipe_wm *wm1,
-			       const struct skl_pipe_wm *wm2)
-{
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
-	enum plane_id plane_id;
-
-	for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
-		if (!skl_plane_wm_equals(dev_priv,
-					 &wm1->planes[plane_id],
-					 &wm2->planes[plane_id]))
-			return false;
-	}
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 static inline bool skl_ddb_entries_overlap(const struct skl_ddb_entry *a,
 					   const struct skl_ddb_entry *b)
 {
@@ -5372,8 +5355,6 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	 * to grab the lock on *all* CRTC's.
 	 */
 	if (state->active_pipe_changes || state->modeset) {
-		state->wm_results.dirty_pipes = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->pipe_mask;
-
 		ret = intel_add_all_pipes(state);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -5448,12 +5429,8 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
 	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
 	struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
-	struct skl_ddb_values *results = &state->wm_results;
 	int ret, i;
 
-	/* Clear all dirty flags */
-	results->dirty_pipes = 0;
-
 	ret = skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(state);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -5461,8 +5438,7 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	/*
 	 * Calculate WM's for all pipes that are part of this transaction.
 	 * Note that skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes may have added more CRTC's that
-	 * weren't otherwise being modified (and set bits in dirty_pipes) if
-	 * pipe allocations had to change.
+	 * weren't otherwise being modified if pipe allocations had to change.
 	 */
 	for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
 					    new_crtc_state, i) {
@@ -5473,11 +5449,6 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 		ret = skl_wm_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-
-		if (!skl_pipe_wm_equals(crtc,
-					&old_crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal,
-					&new_crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal))
-			results->dirty_pipes |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
 	}
 
 	ret = skl_compute_ddb(state);
@@ -5615,7 +5586,6 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 
 void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	struct skl_ddb_values *hw = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw;
 	struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
 	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
@@ -5625,9 +5595,6 @@ void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
 
 		skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(crtc, &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal);
-
-		if (crtc->active)
-			hw->dirty_pipes |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
 	}
 
 	if (dev_priv->active_pipes) {
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20 17:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/17] drm/i915: Global state rework Ville Syrjala
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915: Polish WM_LINETIME register stuff Ville Syrjala
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915: Move linetime wms into the crtc state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-29 14:05   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-01-31 15:07   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-20 17:47 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915: Move more cdclk state handling into the cdclk code Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:39   ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/17] drm/i915: Collect more cdclk state under the same roof Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:43   ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915: s/need_cd2x_updare/can_cd2x_update/ Ville Syrjala
2020-01-24 12:24   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915: s/cdclk_state/cdclk_config/ Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:51   ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915: Simplify intel_set_cdclk_{pre, post}_plane_update() calling convention Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:51   ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/17] drm/i915: Extract intel_cdclk_state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:51   ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915: swap() the entire cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-24 15:06   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915: s/init_cdclk/init_cdclk_hw/ Ville Syrjala
2020-01-24 15:08   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/17] drm/i915: Move intel_atomic_state_free() into intel_atomic.c Ville Syrjala
2020-01-24 15:19   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915: Intrduce better global state handling Ville Syrjala
2020-01-28 14:44   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-01-28 15:29     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915: Introduce " Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 19:00   ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-22 19:11     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-27 15:02   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915: Convert bandwidth state to global state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-27 15:21   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/17] drm/i915: Introduce intel_calc_active_pipes() Ville Syrjala
2020-01-27 15:25   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915: Convert cdclk to global state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-21 14:03   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2020-01-27 17:03     ` Imre Deak
2020-01-27 17:15       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-27 17:54         ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915: Store active_pipes bitmask in cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-27 17:11   ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 18:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Global state rework Patchwork
2020-01-21  2:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-01-21 13:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-01-21 17:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Global state rework (rev2) Patchwork
2020-01-21 18:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-01-23  0:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200120174728.21095-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.