From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] More split-brain fixes for metadata uuid feature
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:23:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121152343.GX3929@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114171403.GH3929@twin.jikos.cz>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 06:14:03PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:11:31PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > Here are 4 patches which fix a newly found split-brain scenario in the
> > METADATA_UUID_INCOMPAT code. They are mostly the identical with Su's
> > original submission but I have reworked the changelogs and some function
> > names. Hence, I retained his authorship of the patches.
> >
> > First 2 patches factor out some code with the hopes of making find_fisd a bit
> > more readable and simplifying the myriad of nested 'if' in device_list_add.
> >
> > Patch 3 extends find_fsid_changed to handle the case where a disk with
> > METADATA_UUID_INCOMPAT and FSID_CHANGING_IN_PROGRESS is scanned after a disk
> > which has successfully been switched to FSID == METADATA_UUID state and has
> > created btrfs_fs_devices.
> >
> > Patch 4 handles the counterpart situation - a fully switched disk is scanned
> > after one which has had METADATA_UUID_INCOMPAT and FSID_CHANGING_IN_PROGRESS
> > set.
> >
> > This series should be applied to stable branches following 5.0 when the
> > metadata_uuid feature got introduced.
> >
> > This patchset was tested with btrfs-progs' misc 034-metadata-uuid test and a full
> > xfstest run with no regressions. I will also be sending an improvement to the
> > test case which exercises the newly added code.
> >
> > btrfs: Call find_fsid from find_fsid_inprogress
> > btrfs: Factor out metadata_uuid code from find_fsid.
> > btrfs: Handle another split brain scenario with metadata uuid feature
> > btrfs: Fix split-brain handling when changing FSID to metadata uuid
>
> I'm adding it to for-next, thanks.
Moving to misc-next.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-10 12:11 Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: Call find_fsid from find_fsid_inprogress Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-10 15:24 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: Factor out metadata_uuid code from find_fsid Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-10 15:25 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: Handle another split brain scenario with metadata uuid feature Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-10 15:29 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-21 15:16 ` David Sterba
2020-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: Fix split-brain handling when changing FSID to metadata uuid Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-10 15:58 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] More split-brain fixes for metadata uuid feature David Sterba
2020-01-21 15:23 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200121152343.GX3929@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 0/4] More split-brain fixes for metadata uuid feature' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.