From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:58:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205125804.GM14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205123216.GO12867@shao2-debian>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:32:16PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -5.5% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 81ec3f3c4c4d78f2d3b6689c9816bfbdf7417dbb ("perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
I'm fairly sure this bisect/result is bogus.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 13:58:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205125804.GM14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205123216.GO12867@shao2-debian>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 399 bytes --]
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:32:16PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -5.5% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 81ec3f3c4c4d78f2d3b6689c9816bfbdf7417dbb ("perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
I'm fairly sure this bisect/result is bogus.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 12:32 [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression kernel test robot
2020-02-05 12:32 ` kernel test robot
2020-02-05 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-02-05 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-06 3:04 ` [LKP] " Li, Philip
2020-02-06 3:04 ` Li, Philip
2020-02-21 8:03 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-21 8:03 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-21 10:58 ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-21 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-21 13:20 ` [LKP] " Jiri Olsa
2020-02-21 13:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-23 14:11 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-23 14:11 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-23 17:37 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-23 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 0:33 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-24 0:33 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24 1:06 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 1:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 1:58 ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2020-02-24 1:58 ` Huang, Ying
2020-02-24 2:19 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-24 2:19 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24 13:20 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-24 13:20 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24 19:24 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 19:42 ` [LKP] " Kleen, Andi
2020-02-24 19:42 ` Kleen, Andi
2020-02-24 20:09 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 20:47 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 21:20 ` [LKP] " Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 21:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 21:43 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 21:59 ` [LKP] " Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 21:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 22:12 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 22:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-25 2:57 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-25 2:57 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-25 3:15 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-25 3:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-25 4:53 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-25 4:53 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-23 19:36 ` [LKP] " Jiri Olsa
2020-02-23 19:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-24 1:14 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-21 18:05 ` [LKP] " Kleen, Andi
2020-02-21 18:05 ` Kleen, Andi
2020-02-22 12:43 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-22 12:43 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-22 17:08 ` [LKP] " Kleen, Andi
2020-02-22 17:08 ` Kleen, Andi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200205125804.GM14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.