All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Vince Weaver" <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lkp@lists.01.org" <lkp@lists.01.org>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [LKP] Re: [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:42:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E8ECBC65D0B2554DAD44EBE43059B3740F2AA1@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjkSb1OkiCSn_fzf2v7A=K0bNsUEeQa+06XMhTO+oQUaA@mail.gmail.com>

>Does anybody else have any ideas?

We've had problems with atomics having strange ordering constraints before.

But it might be c2c missing the right cache line. There are some known cases where that can happen.

Feng, can you double check with 

perf record -a -d -e mem_load_l3_hit_retired.xsnp_hitm:pp,mem_load_l3_miss_retired.remote_hitm:pp ...

Does it report the same hot IPs as c2c?
What's the break down between the first and the second event for the hot IPs? The first is inside socket, the second between sockets.

-Andi


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kleen, Andi <andi.kleen@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:42:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E8ECBC65D0B2554DAD44EBE43059B3740F2AA1@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjkSb1OkiCSn_fzf2v7A=K0bNsUEeQa+06XMhTO+oQUaA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 548 bytes --]

>Does anybody else have any ideas?

We've had problems with atomics having strange ordering constraints before.

But it might be c2c missing the right cache line. There are some known cases where that can happen.

Feng, can you double check with 

perf record -a -d -e mem_load_l3_hit_retired.xsnp_hitm:pp,mem_load_l3_miss_retired.remote_hitm:pp ...

Does it report the same hot IPs as c2c?
What's the break down between the first and the second event for the hot IPs? The first is inside socket, the second between sockets.

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-24 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-05 12:32 [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression kernel test robot
2020-02-05 12:32 ` kernel test robot
2020-02-05 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-05 12:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-06  3:04   ` [LKP] " Li, Philip
2020-02-06  3:04     ` Li, Philip
2020-02-21  8:03   ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-21  8:03     ` Feng Tang
2020-02-21 10:58     ` [LKP] " Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-21 10:58       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-21 13:20     ` [LKP] " Jiri Olsa
2020-02-21 13:20       ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-23 14:11       ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-23 14:11         ` Feng Tang
2020-02-23 17:37         ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-23 17:37           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24  0:33           ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-24  0:33             ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24  1:06             ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24  1:06               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24  1:58               ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2020-02-24  1:58                 ` Huang, Ying
2020-02-24  2:19               ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-24  2:19                 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24 13:20                 ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-24 13:20                   ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24 19:24                 ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 19:24                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 19:42                   ` Kleen, Andi [this message]
2020-02-24 19:42                     ` Kleen, Andi
2020-02-24 20:09                   ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 20:09                     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 20:47                     ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 20:47                       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 21:20                       ` [LKP] " Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 21:20                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 21:43                         ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 21:43                           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 21:59                           ` [LKP] " Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 21:59                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 22:12                             ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 22:12                               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-25  2:57                       ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-25  2:57                         ` Feng Tang
2020-02-25  3:15                         ` [LKP] " Linus Torvalds
2020-02-25  3:15                           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-25  4:53                           ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-25  4:53                             ` Feng Tang
2020-02-23 19:36         ` [LKP] " Jiri Olsa
2020-02-23 19:36           ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-24  1:14           ` Feng Tang
2020-02-21 18:05     ` [LKP] " Kleen, Andi
2020-02-21 18:05       ` Kleen, Andi
2020-02-22 12:43       ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2020-02-22 12:43         ` Feng Tang
2020-02-22 17:08         ` [LKP] " Kleen, Andi
2020-02-22 17:08           ` Kleen, Andi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E8ECBC65D0B2554DAD44EBE43059B3740F2AA1@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.