All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers base/arch_topology: Remove 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:02:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200210160252.GA702121@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200210152420.10608-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:24:20PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> The sched domain pointer argument from topology_get_freq_scale() and
> topology_get_cpu_scale() got removed by commit 7673c8a4c75d
> ("sched/cpufreq: Remove arch_scale_freq_capacity()'s 'sd' parameter")
> and commit 8ec59c0f5f49 ("sched/topology: Remove unused 'sd' parameter
> from arch_scale_cpu_capacity()").
> 
> So the 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration is no longer needed.
> Remove it.
> 
> W/o the sched domain pointer argument the storage class and inline
> definition as well as the return type, function name and parameter list
> fit all into one line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> index 3015ecbb90b1..c507e9ddd909 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> @@ -16,9 +16,7 @@ bool topology_parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu);
>  
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale);
>  
> -struct sched_domain;
> -static inline
> -unsigned long topology_get_cpu_scale(int cpu)
> +static inline unsigned long topology_get_cpu_scale(int cpu)
>  {
>  	return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu);
>  }
> @@ -27,8 +25,7 @@ void topology_set_cpu_scale(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long capacity);
>  
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, freq_scale);
>  
> -static inline
> -unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu)
> +static inline unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu)

You are doing two different things in this patch :(

Reformatting the function names are fine, but that has nothing to do
with dropping the "struct sched_domain;" line.  Please split into 2
different patches.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers base/arch_topology: Remove 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:02:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200210160252.GA702121@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200210152420.10608-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:24:20PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> The sched domain pointer argument from topology_get_freq_scale() and
> topology_get_cpu_scale() got removed by commit 7673c8a4c75d
> ("sched/cpufreq: Remove arch_scale_freq_capacity()'s 'sd' parameter")
> and commit 8ec59c0f5f49 ("sched/topology: Remove unused 'sd' parameter
> from arch_scale_cpu_capacity()").
> 
> So the 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration is no longer needed.
> Remove it.
> 
> W/o the sched domain pointer argument the storage class and inline
> definition as well as the return type, function name and parameter list
> fit all into one line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> index 3015ecbb90b1..c507e9ddd909 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> @@ -16,9 +16,7 @@ bool topology_parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu);
>  
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale);
>  
> -struct sched_domain;
> -static inline
> -unsigned long topology_get_cpu_scale(int cpu)
> +static inline unsigned long topology_get_cpu_scale(int cpu)
>  {
>  	return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu);
>  }
> @@ -27,8 +25,7 @@ void topology_set_cpu_scale(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long capacity);
>  
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, freq_scale);
>  
> -static inline
> -unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu)
> +static inline unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu)

You are doing two different things in this patch :(

Reformatting the function names are fine, but that has nothing to do
with dropping the "struct sched_domain;" line.  Please split into 2
different patches.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-10 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 15:24 [PATCH] drivers base/arch_topology: Remove 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-10 15:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-10 16:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-02-10 16:02   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-07 11:49 Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-07 11:49 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-07 15:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 15:48   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-10 15:20   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-10 15:20     ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200210160252.GA702121@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.