* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
@ 2020-02-24 19:12 Lucas De Marchi
2020-02-24 21:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-26 8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2020-02-24 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Lucas De Marchi, ramlingam.c
Wa_1608008084 is an additional WA that applies to writes on FF_MODE2
register. We can't read it back either from CPU or GPU. Since the other
bits should be 0, recommendation to handle Wa_1604555607 is to actually
just write the timer value.
Do a write only and don't try to read it, neither before or after
the WA is applied.
Fixes: ff690b2111ba ("drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607")
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 19 +++++++------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 887e0dc701f7..06cef3c18f26 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -580,24 +580,19 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
struct i915_wa_list *wal)
{
- u32 val;
-
/* Wa_1409142259:tgl */
WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
- /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */
- val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2);
- val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK;
- val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128;
/*
- * FIXME: FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0. We can
- * enable verification of WA from the later steppings, which enables
- * the read of FF_MODE2.
+ * Wa_1604555607:gen12 and Wa_1608008084:gen12
+ * FF_MODE2 register will return the wrong value when read. The default
+ * value for this register is zero for all fields and there are no bit
+ * masks. So instead of doing a RMW we should just write the TDS timer
+ * value for Wa_1604555607.
*/
- wa_add(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val,
- IS_TGL_REVID(engine->i915, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_A0) ? 0 :
- FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK);
+ wa_add(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK,
+ FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128, 0);
}
static void
--
2.24.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 (rev2)
2020-02-24 19:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 Lucas De Marchi
@ 2020-02-24 21:06 ` Patchwork
2020-02-26 8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-02-24 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73801/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7999 -> Patchwork_16694
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/index.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16694 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices:
- fi-tgl-y: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] ([CI#94])
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html
* igt@gem_mmap@basic:
- fi-tgl-y: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([CI#94] / [i915#402])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap@basic.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap@basic.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-hsw-peppy: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#722])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
- fi-hsw-4770r: [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-FAIL][8] ([i915#722])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/fi-hsw-4770r/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([fdo#111407])
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-yf-tiled:
- fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][11] ([CI#94] / [i915#402]) -> [PASS][12] +1 similar issue
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/fi-tgl-y/igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-yf-tiled.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/fi-tgl-y/igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-yf-tiled.html
[CI#94]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/i915-infra/issues/94
[fdo#111407]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111407
[i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
[i915#722]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/722
Participating hosts (52 -> 42)
------------------------------
Missing (10): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ilk-650 fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-n2820 fi-byt-clapper fi-bsw-nick fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7999 -> Patchwork_16694
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7999: e853e3d470d1bb4ac87042094b99adbdbaa87944 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5463: d519c80219ebe558cd2fa378f26f9d73f9e35310 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_16694: f7e443d7006eb83427b962f2ed0043822856ea3f @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
f7e443d7006e drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 (rev2)
2020-02-24 19:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 Lucas De Marchi
2020-02-24 21:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2020-02-26 8:56 ` Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-02-26 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73801/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7999_full -> Patchwork_16694_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16694_full that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#112080]) +23 similar issues
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1.html
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#180]) +5 similar issues
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3.html
* igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#110841])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([i915#677])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common-bsd.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common-bsd.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#109276]) +21 similar issues
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][11] -> [SKIP][12] ([fdo#112146]) +5 similar issues
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html
* igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak:
- shard-apl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#644])
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-apl7/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-apl1/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-128x128-onscreen:
- shard-skl: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#54])
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-skl2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-128x128-onscreen.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-skl8/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-128x128-onscreen.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt:
- shard-glk: [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#49])
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-glk5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-glk3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@hang-read-crc-pipe-b:
- shard-skl: [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([i915#53])
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-skl5/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@hang-read-crc-pipe-b.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-skl7/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@hang-read-crc-pipe-b.html
* igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes:
- shard-apl: [PASS][21] -> [DMESG-WARN][22] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-apl3/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes.html
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-apl6/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min:
- shard-skl: [PASS][23] -> [FAIL][24] ([fdo#108145])
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-skl5/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min.html
[24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min.html
* igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-y:
- shard-glk: [PASS][25] -> [FAIL][26] ([i915#899])
[25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-glk6/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-y.html
[26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-glk5/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-y.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][27] -> [SKIP][28] ([fdo#109441]) +2 similar issues
[27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu.html
[28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][29] -> [FAIL][30] ([i915#31])
[29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
[30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
* igt@sw_sync@sync_multi_producer_single_consumer:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][31] -> [TIMEOUT][32] ([fdo#112271])
[31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb7/igt@sw_sync@sync_multi_producer_single_consumer.html
[32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb2/igt@sw_sync@sync_multi_producer_single_consumer.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-s3:
- shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][33] ([i915#56]) -> [PASS][34]
[33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-s3.html
[34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-s3.html
* igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][35] ([fdo#110854]) -> [PASS][36]
[35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
[36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
* {igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-write-read-bsd1}:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][37] ([fdo#109276] / [i915#677]) -> [PASS][38] +1 similar issue
[37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-write-read-bsd1.html
[38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-write-read-bsd1.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-userfault-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][39] ([i915#677]) -> [PASS][40] +1 similar issue
[39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-userfault-bsd.html
[40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-userfault-bsd.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][41] ([fdo#112146]) -> [PASS][42] +7 similar issues
[41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd.html
[42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-execbuf:
- shard-skl: [INCOMPLETE][43] ([i915#151] / [i915#69]) -> [PASS][44]
[43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-skl1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-execbuf.html
[44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-skl8/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-execbuf.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
- shard-apl: [DMESG-WARN][45] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][46] +3 similar issues
[45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-apl8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
[46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-apl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
* {igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-dpms}:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][47] ([i915#1188]) -> [PASS][48]
[47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-skl9/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-dpms.html
[48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-skl6/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-dpms.html
* {igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend}:
- shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][49] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][50] +3 similar issues
[49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html
[50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_render:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][51] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][52] +1 similar issue
[51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_render.html
[52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_render.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][53] ([i915#31]) -> [PASS][54]
[53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-skl6/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
[54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-skl3/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
- shard-glk: [FAIL][55] ([i915#31]) -> [PASS][56]
[55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-glk2/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
[56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-glk4/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-no-semaphores-vcs1:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][57] ([fdo#112080]) -> [PASS][58] +10 similar issues
[57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb5/igt@perf_pmu@busy-no-semaphores-vcs1.html
[58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb4/igt@perf_pmu@busy-no-semaphores-vcs1.html
* igt@prime_busy@hang-bsd2:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][59] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][60] +29 similar issues
[59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb6/igt@prime_busy@hang-bsd2.html
[60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb1/igt@prime_busy@hang-bsd2.html
#### Warnings ####
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][61] ([fdo#112080]) -> [FAIL][62] ([IGT#28])
[61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch.html
[62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@legacy-planes-dpms:
- shard-snb: [INCOMPLETE][63] ([i915#82]) -> [SKIP][64] ([fdo#109271])
[63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-snb5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@legacy-planes-dpms.html
[64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-snb6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@legacy-planes-dpms.html
* igt@kms_content_protection@atomic:
- shard-kbl: [TIMEOUT][65] ([fdo#112271]) -> [TIMEOUT][66] ([fdo#112271] / [i915#727]) +2 similar issues
[65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html
[66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html
* igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp:
- shard-iclb: [DMESG-WARN][67] ([i915#1226]) -> [SKIP][68] ([fdo#109349])
[67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7999/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp.html
[68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[IGT#28]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/issues/28
[fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
[fdo#109349]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109349
[fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
[fdo#110841]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110841
[fdo#110854]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110854
[fdo#112080]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112080
[fdo#112146]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112146
[fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
[i915#1188]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1188
[i915#1226]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1226
[i915#151]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/151
[i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180
[i915#31]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/31
[i915#49]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/49
[i915#53]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/53
[i915#54]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/54
[i915#56]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/56
[i915#58]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/58
[i915#644]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/644
[i915#677]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/677
[i915#69]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/69
[i915#727]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/727
[i915#82]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/82
[i915#899]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/899
[k.org#198133]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198133
Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
------------------------------
No changes in participating hosts
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7999 -> Patchwork_16694
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7999: e853e3d470d1bb4ac87042094b99adbdbaa87944 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5463: d519c80219ebe558cd2fa378f26f9d73f9e35310 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_16694: f7e443d7006eb83427b962f2ed0043822856ea3f @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16694/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
2020-02-24 21:10 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2020-02-24 21:54 ` Lucas De Marchi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2020-02-24 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: michel.thierry, intel-gfx, ramlingam.c
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:10:34PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>Quoting Souza, Jose (2020-02-22 00:36:53)
>> + CCing people involved in the patch fixed.
>>
>> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 16:28 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> > Wa_1608008084 is an additional WA that applies to writes on FF_MODE2
>> > register. We can't read it back either from CPU or GPU. Since the
>> > other
>> > bits should be 0, recommendation to handle Wa_1604555607 is to
>> > actually
>> > just write the timer value.
>> >
>> > Do a write only and don't try to read it, neither before or after
>> > the WA is applied.
>> >
>> > Fixes: ff690b2111ba ("drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607")
>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 22 ++++++++++---------
>> > --
>> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
>> > index 887e0dc701f7..0d76e1d6ec87 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
>> > @@ -580,24 +580,22 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct
>> > intel_engine_cs *engine,
>> > static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>> > struct i915_wa_list *wal)
>> > {
>> > - u32 val;
>> > -
>> > /* Wa_1409142259:tgl */
>> > WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
>> > GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
>> >
>> > - /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */
>> > - val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2);
>> > - val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK;
>> > - val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128;
>> > /*
>> > - * FIXME: FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0. We can
>> > - * enable verification of WA from the later steppings, which
>> > enables
>> > - * the read of FF_MODE2.
>> > + * Wa_1604555607:gen12
>> > + * FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0, either by CPU
>> > or GPU.
>>
>> The line above could be removed as the comments above explain it
>> better, also BSpec don't say that it will be fixed in B0.
>
>The HW guys on discovering the bug promised it would be fixed for B0.
>-Chris
So... we have 2 different things here: setting the timer in FF_MODE2
is the Wa_1604555607. According to the comments on the spec it could
even be treated as a general "gen12 programming mode" rather that a WA.
The fact that we can't read the register since it's tied to another
clock is the Wa_1608008084. I don't see it documented anywhere that it is
fixed in B0. Not even as a comment to the issue. And it's in fact even
marked as permanent.
Lucas De Marchi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
2020-02-22 0:36 ` Souza, Jose
2020-02-22 1:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
@ 2020-02-24 21:10 ` Chris Wilson
2020-02-24 21:54 ` Lucas De Marchi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-02-24 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: De Marchi, Lucas, Souza, Jose, intel-gfx; +Cc: michel.thierry, ramlingam.c
Quoting Souza, Jose (2020-02-22 00:36:53)
> + CCing people involved in the patch fixed.
>
> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 16:28 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > Wa_1608008084 is an additional WA that applies to writes on FF_MODE2
> > register. We can't read it back either from CPU or GPU. Since the
> > other
> > bits should be 0, recommendation to handle Wa_1604555607 is to
> > actually
> > just write the timer value.
> >
> > Do a write only and don't try to read it, neither before or after
> > the WA is applied.
> >
> > Fixes: ff690b2111ba ("drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607")
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 22 ++++++++++---------
> > --
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > index 887e0dc701f7..0d76e1d6ec87 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > @@ -580,24 +580,22 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct
> > intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> > {
> > - u32 val;
> > -
> > /* Wa_1409142259:tgl */
> > WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
> > GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
> >
> > - /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */
> > - val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2);
> > - val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK;
> > - val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128;
> > /*
> > - * FIXME: FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0. We can
> > - * enable verification of WA from the later steppings, which
> > enables
> > - * the read of FF_MODE2.
> > + * Wa_1604555607:gen12
> > + * FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0, either by CPU
> > or GPU.
>
> The line above could be removed as the comments above explain it
> better, also BSpec don't say that it will be fixed in B0.
The HW guys on discovering the bug promised it would be fixed for B0.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
2020-02-22 0:36 ` Souza, Jose
@ 2020-02-22 1:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-02-24 21:10 ` Chris Wilson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2020-02-22 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Souza, Jose; +Cc: intel-gfx, michel.thierry, ramlingam.c
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:36:53PM -0800, Jose Souza wrote:
>+ CCing people involved in the patch fixed.
>
>On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 16:28 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> Wa_1608008084 is an additional WA that applies to writes on FF_MODE2
>> register. We can't read it back either from CPU or GPU. Since the
>> other
>> bits should be 0, recommendation to handle Wa_1604555607 is to
>> actually
>> just write the timer value.
>>
>> Do a write only and don't try to read it, neither before or after
>> the WA is applied.
>>
>> Fixes: ff690b2111ba ("drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607")
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 22 ++++++++++---------
>> --
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
>> index 887e0dc701f7..0d76e1d6ec87 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
>> @@ -580,24 +580,22 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct
>> intel_engine_cs *engine,
>> static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>> struct i915_wa_list *wal)
>> {
>> - u32 val;
>> -
>> /* Wa_1409142259:tgl */
>> WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
>> GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
>>
>> - /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */
>> - val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2);
>> - val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK;
>> - val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128;
>> /*
>> - * FIXME: FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0. We can
>> - * enable verification of WA from the later steppings, which
>> enables
>> - * the read of FF_MODE2.
>> + * Wa_1604555607:gen12
>> + * FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0, either by CPU
>> or GPU.
>
>The line above could be removed as the comments above explain it
>better, also BSpec don't say that it will be fixed in B0.
1604555607 was documented to be fixed in B0. Just saw it's not anymore.
>
>With that:
>Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
>
>> + *
>> + * Wa_1608008084:gen12
>> + * FF_MODE2 register will return the wrong value when read. The
>> default
>> + * value for this register is zero for all fields and there are
>> no bit
>> + * masks. So instead of doing a RMW we should just write the
>> TDS timer
>> + * value for Wa_1604555607.
>> */
>> - wa_add(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val,
>> - IS_TGL_REVID(engine->i915, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_A0) ?
>> 0 :
>> - FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK);
>> + wa_add(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK,
>> + FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128, 0);
>> }
>>
>> static void
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
2020-02-22 0:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 Lucas De Marchi
@ 2020-02-22 0:36 ` Souza, Jose
2020-02-22 1:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-02-24 21:10 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Souza, Jose @ 2020-02-22 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, De Marchi, Lucas; +Cc: michel.thierry, ramlingam.c
+ CCing people involved in the patch fixed.
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 16:28 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Wa_1608008084 is an additional WA that applies to writes on FF_MODE2
> register. We can't read it back either from CPU or GPU. Since the
> other
> bits should be 0, recommendation to handle Wa_1604555607 is to
> actually
> just write the timer value.
>
> Do a write only and don't try to read it, neither before or after
> the WA is applied.
>
> Fixes: ff690b2111ba ("drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607")
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 22 ++++++++++---------
> --
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> index 887e0dc701f7..0d76e1d6ec87 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> @@ -580,24 +580,22 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct
> intel_engine_cs *engine,
> static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> {
> - u32 val;
> -
> /* Wa_1409142259:tgl */
> WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
> GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
>
> - /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */
> - val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2);
> - val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK;
> - val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128;
> /*
> - * FIXME: FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0. We can
> - * enable verification of WA from the later steppings, which
> enables
> - * the read of FF_MODE2.
> + * Wa_1604555607:gen12
> + * FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0, either by CPU
> or GPU.
The line above could be removed as the comments above explain it
better, also BSpec don't say that it will be fixed in B0.
With that:
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> + *
> + * Wa_1608008084:gen12
> + * FF_MODE2 register will return the wrong value when read. The
> default
> + * value for this register is zero for all fields and there are
> no bit
> + * masks. So instead of doing a RMW we should just write the
> TDS timer
> + * value for Wa_1604555607.
> */
> - wa_add(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val,
> - IS_TGL_REVID(engine->i915, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_A0) ?
> 0 :
> - FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK);
> + wa_add(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK,
> + FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128, 0);
> }
>
> static void
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
@ 2020-02-22 0:28 Lucas De Marchi
2020-02-22 0:36 ` Souza, Jose
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2020-02-22 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Lucas De Marchi
Wa_1608008084 is an additional WA that applies to writes on FF_MODE2
register. We can't read it back either from CPU or GPU. Since the other
bits should be 0, recommendation to handle Wa_1604555607 is to actually
just write the timer value.
Do a write only and don't try to read it, neither before or after
the WA is applied.
Fixes: ff690b2111ba ("drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607")
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 22 ++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 887e0dc701f7..0d76e1d6ec87 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -580,24 +580,22 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
struct i915_wa_list *wal)
{
- u32 val;
-
/* Wa_1409142259:tgl */
WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
- /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */
- val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2);
- val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK;
- val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128;
/*
- * FIXME: FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0. We can
- * enable verification of WA from the later steppings, which enables
- * the read of FF_MODE2.
+ * Wa_1604555607:gen12
+ * FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0, either by CPU or GPU.
+ *
+ * Wa_1608008084:gen12
+ * FF_MODE2 register will return the wrong value when read. The default
+ * value for this register is zero for all fields and there are no bit
+ * masks. So instead of doing a RMW we should just write the TDS timer
+ * value for Wa_1604555607.
*/
- wa_add(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val,
- IS_TGL_REVID(engine->i915, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_A0) ? 0 :
- FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK);
+ wa_add(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK,
+ FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128, 0);
}
static void
--
2.24.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-26 8:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-24 19:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 Lucas De Marchi
2020-02-24 21:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-26 8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-22 0:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 Lucas De Marchi
2020-02-22 0:36 ` Souza, Jose
2020-02-22 1:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-02-24 21:10 ` Chris Wilson
2020-02-24 21:54 ` Lucas De Marchi
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.