From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
"Grimm, Jon" <jon.grimm@amd.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
baekhw@google.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc 3/6] dma-remap: wire up the atomic pools depending on gfp mask
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:43:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305154312.GB5332@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2003011537220.213582@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 04:05:16PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> When allocating non-blockable memory, determine the optimal gfp mask of
> the device and use the appropriate atomic pool.
>
> The coherent DMA mask will remain the same between allocation and free
> and, thus, memory will be freed to the same atomic pool it was allocated
> from.
I think this should go into the previous patch, as it is rather pointless
without the changes in this one.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
"Grimm, Jon" <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
baekhw@google.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [rfc 3/6] dma-remap: wire up the atomic pools depending on gfp mask
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:43:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305154312.GB5332@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2003011537220.213582@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 04:05:16PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> When allocating non-blockable memory, determine the optimal gfp mask of
> the device and use the appropriate atomic pool.
>
> The coherent DMA mask will remain the same between allocation and free
> and, thus, memory will be freed to the same atomic pool it was allocated
> from.
I think this should go into the previous patch, as it is rather pointless
without the changes in this one.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-01 1:54 [rfc] dma-mapping: preallocate unencrypted DMA atomic pool David Rientjes
2020-01-01 1:54 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-06 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-06 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-07 10:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-07 10:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-07 19:57 ` David Rientjes
2020-01-07 19:57 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-09 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-09 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-09 18:58 ` David Rientjes
2020-01-09 18:58 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-17 15:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-01-17 15:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-02-28 9:27 ` David Rientjes
2020-02-28 9:27 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02 0:05 ` [rfc 0/6] unencrypted atomic DMA pools with dynamic expansion David Rientjes
2020-03-02 0:05 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02 0:05 ` [rfc 1/6] dma-mapping: pass device to atomic allocation functions David Rientjes
2020-03-02 0:05 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02 0:05 ` [rfc 2/6] dma-remap: add additional atomic pools to map to gfp mask David Rientjes
2020-03-02 0:05 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-05 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02 0:05 ` [rfc 3/6] dma-remap: wire up the atomic pools depending on " David Rientjes
2020-03-02 0:05 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-03-05 15:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02 0:05 ` [rfc 4/6] dma-remap: dynamically expanding atomic pools David Rientjes
2020-03-02 0:05 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-03 22:29 ` David Rientjes
2020-03-03 22:29 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02 0:05 ` [rfc 5/6] dma-direct: atomic allocations must come from unencrypted pools David Rientjes
2020-03-02 0:05 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-05 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-07 0:36 ` David Rientjes
2020-03-07 0:36 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-10 18:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-10 18:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02 0:05 ` [rfc 6/6] dma-remap: double the default DMA coherent pool size David Rientjes
2020-03-02 0:05 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-05 15:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 21:21 ` [rfc v2 0/6] unencrypted atomic DMA pools with dynamic expansion David Rientjes
2020-04-08 21:21 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21 ` [rfc v2 1/6] dma-remap: separate DMA atomic pools from direct remap code David Rientjes
2020-04-08 21:21 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 21:21 ` [rfc v2 2/6] dma-pool: add additional coherent pools to map to gfp mask David Rientjes
2020-04-08 21:21 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21 ` [rfc v2 3/6] dma-pool: dynamically expanding atomic pools David Rientjes
2020-04-08 21:21 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21 ` [rfc v2 4/6] dma-direct: atomic allocations must come from atomic coherent pools David Rientjes
2020-04-08 21:21 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-09 21:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-04-09 21:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-04-14 19:18 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-14 19:18 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 19:20 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-14 19:20 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21 ` [rfc v2 5/6] x86/mm: unencrypted non-blocking DMA allocations use " David Rientjes
2020-04-08 21:21 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21 ` [rfc v2 6/6] dma-pool: scale the default DMA coherent pool size with memory capacity David Rientjes
2020-04-08 21:21 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-10 14:55 ` [rfc v2 3/6] dma-pool: dynamically expanding atomic pools Hillf Danton
2020-04-10 19:37 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-10 19:37 ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 19:23 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-14 19:23 ` David Rientjes via iommu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200305154312.GB5332@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=baekhw@google.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.