From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de> To: target-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, bvanassche@acm.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: target: XCOPY performance Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:19:49 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200327141954.955-1-ddiss@suse.de> (raw) These changes remove unnecessary heap allocations in the XCOPY READ/WRITE dispatch loop. Synthetic benchmarks on my laptop using the libiscsi iscsi-dd utility (--xcopy --max 1 --blocks 65535 src=dst) against a target backed by an 8G zram (DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y) iblock backstore (avg across four runs) show: before: 5.30845G/s after: 5.99056G/s (approx. +12.8%) Changes since v2: - 5/5: incorporate Christoph's clean up suggestions Changes since v1: - drop RFC - rework 3/5 and 5/5 following Christoph's feedback Feedback appreciated. Cheers, David ---------------------------------------------------------------- David Disseldorp (5): scsi: target: use #def for xcopy descriptor len scsi: target: drop xcopy DISK BLOCK LENGTH debug scsi: target: avoid per-loop XCOPY buffer allocations scsi: target: increase XCOPY I/O size scsi: target: use the stack for XCOPY passthrough cmds drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c | 187 ++++++++++------------------- drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.h | 9 +- 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de> To: target-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, bvanassche@acm.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: target: XCOPY performance Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:19:49 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200327141954.955-1-ddiss@suse.de> (raw) These changes remove unnecessary heap allocations in the XCOPY READ/WRITE dispatch loop. Synthetic benchmarks on my laptop using the libiscsi iscsi-dd utility (--xcopy --max 1 --blocks 65535 src=dst) against a target backed by an 8G zram (DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y) iblock backstore (avg across four runs) show: before: 5.30845G/s after: 5.99056G/s (approx. +12.8%) Changes since v2: - 5/5: incorporate Christoph's clean up suggestions Changes since v1: - drop RFC - rework 3/5 and 5/5 following Christoph's feedback Feedback appreciated. Cheers, David ---------------------------------------------------------------- David Disseldorp (5): scsi: target: use #def for xcopy descriptor len scsi: target: drop xcopy DISK BLOCK LENGTH debug scsi: target: avoid per-loop XCOPY buffer allocations scsi: target: increase XCOPY I/O size scsi: target: use the stack for XCOPY passthrough cmds drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c | 187 ++++++++++------------------- drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.h | 9 +- 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 14:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-03-27 14:19 David Disseldorp [this message] 2020-03-27 14:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: target: XCOPY performance David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] scsi: target: use #def for xcopy descriptor len David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] scsi: target: drop xcopy DISK BLOCK LENGTH debug David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] scsi: target: avoid per-loop XCOPY buffer allocations David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] scsi: target: increase XCOPY I/O size David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] scsi: target: use the stack for XCOPY passthrough cmds David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 14:19 ` David Disseldorp 2020-03-27 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: target: XCOPY performance Martin K. Petersen 2020-03-27 17:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200327141954.955-1-ddiss@suse.de \ --to=ddiss@suse.de \ --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \ --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \ --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.