All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com,
	cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Perf notifications support
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:34:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200327143438.5382-11-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327143438.5382-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Make SCMI Perf protocol register with the notification core.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
V5 --> V6
- added handle argument to fill_custom_report()
V4 --> V5
- fixed unsual return construct
V3 --> V4
- scmi_event field renamed
V2 --> V3
- added handle awareness
V1 --> V2
- simplified .set_notify_enabled() implementation moving the ALL_SRCIDs
  logic out of protocol. ALL_SRCIDs logic is now in charge of the
  notification core, together with proper reference counting of enables
- switched to devres protocol-registration
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/scmi_protocol.h    |  15 ++++
 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
index 88509ec637d0..cf1ed7e4e4e3 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/sort.h>
 
 #include "common.h"
+#include "notify.h"
 
 enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd {
 	PERF_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES = 0x3,
@@ -86,6 +87,19 @@ struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits {
 	__le32 notify_enable;
 };
 
+struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld {
+	__le32 agent_id;
+	__le32 domain_id;
+	__le32 range_max;
+	__le32 range_min;
+};
+
+struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld {
+	__le32 agent_id;
+	__le32 domain_id;
+	__le32 performance_level;
+};
+
 struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels {
 	__le16 num_returned;
 	__le16 num_remaining;
@@ -158,6 +172,11 @@ struct scmi_perf_info {
 	struct perf_dom_info *dom_info;
 };
 
+static enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd evt_2_cmd[] = {
+	PERF_NOTIFY_LIMITS,
+	PERF_NOTIFY_LEVEL,
+};
+
 static int scmi_perf_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
 				    struct scmi_perf_info *pi)
 {
@@ -488,6 +507,29 @@ static int scmi_perf_level_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
 	return scmi_perf_mb_level_get(handle, domain, level, poll);
 }
 
+static int scmi_perf_level_limits_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					 u32 domain, int message_id,
+					 bool enable)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct scmi_xfer *t;
+	struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits *notify;
+
+	ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, message_id, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF,
+				 sizeof(*notify), 0, &t);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	notify = t->tx.buf;
+	notify->domain = cpu_to_le32(domain);
+	notify->notify_enable = enable ? cpu_to_le32(BIT(0)) : 0;
+
+	ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
+
+	scmi_xfer_put(handle, t);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static bool scmi_perf_fc_size_is_valid(u32 msg, u32 size)
 {
 	if ((msg == PERF_LEVEL_GET || msg == PERF_LEVEL_SET) && size == 4)
@@ -710,6 +752,89 @@ static struct scmi_perf_ops perf_ops = {
 	.est_power_get = scmi_dvfs_est_power_get,
 };
 
+static bool scmi_perf_set_notify_enabled(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					 u8 evt_id, u32 src_id, bool enable)
+{
+	int ret, cmd_id;
+
+	cmd_id = MAP_EVT_TO_ENABLE_CMD(evt_id, evt_2_cmd);
+	if (cmd_id < 0)
+		return false;
+
+	ret = scmi_perf_level_limits_notify(handle, src_id, cmd_id, enable);
+	if (ret)
+		pr_warn("SCMI Notifications - Proto:%X - FAIL_ENABLED - evt[%X] dom[%d] - ret:%d\n",
+				SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, evt_id, src_id, ret);
+
+	return !ret;
+}
+
+static void *scmi_perf_fill_custom_report(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					  u8 evt_id, u64 timestamp,
+					  const void *payld, size_t payld_sz,
+					  void *report, u32 *src_id)
+{
+	void *rep = NULL;
+
+	switch (evt_id) {
+	case PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED:
+	{
+		const struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld *p = payld;
+		struct scmi_perf_limits_report *r = report;
+
+		if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
+			break;
+
+		r->timestamp = timestamp;
+		r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+		r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id);
+		r->range_max = le32_to_cpu(p->range_max);
+		r->range_min = le32_to_cpu(p->range_min);
+		*src_id = r->domain_id;
+		rep = r;
+		break;
+	}
+	case PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED:
+	{
+		const struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld *p = payld;
+		struct scmi_perf_level_report *r = report;
+
+		if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
+			break;
+
+		r->timestamp = timestamp;
+		r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+		r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id);
+		r->performance_level = le32_to_cpu(p->performance_level);
+		*src_id = r->domain_id;
+		rep = r;
+		break;
+	}
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return rep;
+}
+
+static const struct scmi_event perf_events[] = {
+	{
+		.id = PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED,
+		.max_payld_sz = 16,
+		.max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_limits_report),
+	},
+	{
+		.id = PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED,
+		.max_payld_sz = 12,
+		.max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_level_report),
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct scmi_protocol_event_ops perf_event_ops = {
+	.set_notify_enabled = scmi_perf_set_notify_enabled,
+	.fill_custom_report = scmi_perf_fill_custom_report,
+};
+
 static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
 {
 	int domain;
@@ -742,6 +867,12 @@ static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
 			scmi_perf_domain_init_fc(handle, domain, &dom->fc_info);
 	}
 
+	scmi_register_protocol_events(handle,
+				      SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, PAGE_SIZE,
+				      &perf_event_ops, perf_events,
+				      ARRAY_SIZE(perf_events),
+				      pinfo->num_domains);
+
 	pinfo->version = version;
 	handle->perf_ops = &perf_ops;
 	handle->perf_priv = pinfo;
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index 0b602c32efd1..70aaf1c86901 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -389,4 +389,19 @@ struct scmi_power_state_change_requested_report {
 	u32	power_state;
 };
 
+struct scmi_perf_limits_report {
+	ktime_t	timestamp;
+	u32	agent_id;
+	u32	domain_id;
+	u32	range_max;
+	u32	range_min;
+};
+
+struct scmi_perf_level_report {
+	ktime_t	timestamp;
+	u32	agent_id;
+	u32	domain_id;
+	u32	performance_level;
+};
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_SCMI_PROTOCOL_H */
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Perf notifications support
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:34:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200327143438.5382-11-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327143438.5382-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Make SCMI Perf protocol register with the notification core.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
V5 --> V6
- added handle argument to fill_custom_report()
V4 --> V5
- fixed unsual return construct
V3 --> V4
- scmi_event field renamed
V2 --> V3
- added handle awareness
V1 --> V2
- simplified .set_notify_enabled() implementation moving the ALL_SRCIDs
  logic out of protocol. ALL_SRCIDs logic is now in charge of the
  notification core, together with proper reference counting of enables
- switched to devres protocol-registration
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/scmi_protocol.h    |  15 ++++
 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
index 88509ec637d0..cf1ed7e4e4e3 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/sort.h>
 
 #include "common.h"
+#include "notify.h"
 
 enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd {
 	PERF_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES = 0x3,
@@ -86,6 +87,19 @@ struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits {
 	__le32 notify_enable;
 };
 
+struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld {
+	__le32 agent_id;
+	__le32 domain_id;
+	__le32 range_max;
+	__le32 range_min;
+};
+
+struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld {
+	__le32 agent_id;
+	__le32 domain_id;
+	__le32 performance_level;
+};
+
 struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels {
 	__le16 num_returned;
 	__le16 num_remaining;
@@ -158,6 +172,11 @@ struct scmi_perf_info {
 	struct perf_dom_info *dom_info;
 };
 
+static enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd evt_2_cmd[] = {
+	PERF_NOTIFY_LIMITS,
+	PERF_NOTIFY_LEVEL,
+};
+
 static int scmi_perf_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
 				    struct scmi_perf_info *pi)
 {
@@ -488,6 +507,29 @@ static int scmi_perf_level_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
 	return scmi_perf_mb_level_get(handle, domain, level, poll);
 }
 
+static int scmi_perf_level_limits_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					 u32 domain, int message_id,
+					 bool enable)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct scmi_xfer *t;
+	struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits *notify;
+
+	ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, message_id, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF,
+				 sizeof(*notify), 0, &t);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	notify = t->tx.buf;
+	notify->domain = cpu_to_le32(domain);
+	notify->notify_enable = enable ? cpu_to_le32(BIT(0)) : 0;
+
+	ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
+
+	scmi_xfer_put(handle, t);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static bool scmi_perf_fc_size_is_valid(u32 msg, u32 size)
 {
 	if ((msg == PERF_LEVEL_GET || msg == PERF_LEVEL_SET) && size == 4)
@@ -710,6 +752,89 @@ static struct scmi_perf_ops perf_ops = {
 	.est_power_get = scmi_dvfs_est_power_get,
 };
 
+static bool scmi_perf_set_notify_enabled(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					 u8 evt_id, u32 src_id, bool enable)
+{
+	int ret, cmd_id;
+
+	cmd_id = MAP_EVT_TO_ENABLE_CMD(evt_id, evt_2_cmd);
+	if (cmd_id < 0)
+		return false;
+
+	ret = scmi_perf_level_limits_notify(handle, src_id, cmd_id, enable);
+	if (ret)
+		pr_warn("SCMI Notifications - Proto:%X - FAIL_ENABLED - evt[%X] dom[%d] - ret:%d\n",
+				SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, evt_id, src_id, ret);
+
+	return !ret;
+}
+
+static void *scmi_perf_fill_custom_report(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					  u8 evt_id, u64 timestamp,
+					  const void *payld, size_t payld_sz,
+					  void *report, u32 *src_id)
+{
+	void *rep = NULL;
+
+	switch (evt_id) {
+	case PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED:
+	{
+		const struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld *p = payld;
+		struct scmi_perf_limits_report *r = report;
+
+		if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
+			break;
+
+		r->timestamp = timestamp;
+		r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+		r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id);
+		r->range_max = le32_to_cpu(p->range_max);
+		r->range_min = le32_to_cpu(p->range_min);
+		*src_id = r->domain_id;
+		rep = r;
+		break;
+	}
+	case PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED:
+	{
+		const struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld *p = payld;
+		struct scmi_perf_level_report *r = report;
+
+		if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
+			break;
+
+		r->timestamp = timestamp;
+		r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+		r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id);
+		r->performance_level = le32_to_cpu(p->performance_level);
+		*src_id = r->domain_id;
+		rep = r;
+		break;
+	}
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return rep;
+}
+
+static const struct scmi_event perf_events[] = {
+	{
+		.id = PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED,
+		.max_payld_sz = 16,
+		.max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_limits_report),
+	},
+	{
+		.id = PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED,
+		.max_payld_sz = 12,
+		.max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_level_report),
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct scmi_protocol_event_ops perf_event_ops = {
+	.set_notify_enabled = scmi_perf_set_notify_enabled,
+	.fill_custom_report = scmi_perf_fill_custom_report,
+};
+
 static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
 {
 	int domain;
@@ -742,6 +867,12 @@ static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
 			scmi_perf_domain_init_fc(handle, domain, &dom->fc_info);
 	}
 
+	scmi_register_protocol_events(handle,
+				      SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, PAGE_SIZE,
+				      &perf_event_ops, perf_events,
+				      ARRAY_SIZE(perf_events),
+				      pinfo->num_domains);
+
 	pinfo->version = version;
 	handle->perf_ops = &perf_ops;
 	handle->perf_priv = pinfo;
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index 0b602c32efd1..70aaf1c86901 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -389,4 +389,19 @@ struct scmi_power_state_change_requested_report {
 	u32	power_state;
 };
 
+struct scmi_perf_limits_report {
+	ktime_t	timestamp;
+	u32	agent_id;
+	u32	domain_id;
+	u32	range_max;
+	u32	range_min;
+};
+
+struct scmi_perf_level_report {
+	ktime_t	timestamp;
+	u32	agent_id;
+	u32	domain_id;
+	u32	performance_level;
+};
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_SCMI_PROTOCOL_H */
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-27 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-27 14:34 [PATCH v6 00/13] SCMI Notifications Core Support Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-04-07  9:36   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-07  9:36     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Update protocol commands and notification list Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notifications support in transport layer Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification protocol-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification callbacks-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and delivery Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Enable notification core Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Power notifications support Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2020-03-27 14:34   ` [PATCH v6 10/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Perf " Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Sensor " Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Reset " Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Base " Cristian Marussi
2020-03-27 14:34   ` Cristian Marussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200327143438.5382-11-cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.