All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend SMC/HVC to support multiple channels
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:21:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331142148.GA14918@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR04MB4481FB36D888882183C4293188C80@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Peng,

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:53:40PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend SMC/HVC to support
> > multiple channels
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While merging SMC/HVC transport to SCMI, I did a quick hack to extend it to
> > support multiple channels. I may be missing something obvious, if not the
> > changes required look simple. Some of them could be merged into original
> > patch, but since I am unable to test, I preferred to keep them separate, easy
> > to revert if things break.
>
> With patchset applied to your scmi tree, my test still work as before.
>
> Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>

Thanks for testing. If you can give it a quick review as it is very small
change, that would be great. I just want more eyes to look at it just to
make sure I am not missing something obvious.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend SMC/HVC to support multiple channels
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:21:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331142148.GA14918@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR04MB4481FB36D888882183C4293188C80@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Peng,

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:53:40PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend SMC/HVC to support
> > multiple channels
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While merging SMC/HVC transport to SCMI, I did a quick hack to extend it to
> > support multiple channels. I may be missing something obvious, if not the
> > changes required look simple. Some of them could be merged into original
> > patch, but since I am unable to test, I preferred to keep them separate, easy
> > to revert if things break.
>
> With patchset applied to your scmi tree, my test still work as before.
>
> Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>

Thanks for testing. If you can give it a quick review as it is very small
change, that would be great. I just want more eyes to look at it just to
make sure I am not missing something obvious.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-31 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-27 16:36 [PATCH 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend SMC/HVC to support multiple channels Sudeep Holla
2020-03-27 16:36 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Make mutex channel specific Sudeep Holla
2020-03-27 16:36   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  1:12   ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  1:12     ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  9:12     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  9:12       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  9:14       ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  9:14         ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  9:28         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  9:28           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  9:14   ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  9:14     ` Peng Fan
2020-03-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop empty stub for smc_mark_txdone Sudeep Holla
2020-03-27 16:36   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  1:15   ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  1:15     ` Peng Fan
2020-03-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Check shmem property for channel availablity Sudeep Holla
2020-03-27 16:36   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  1:15   ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  1:15     ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  9:05     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  9:05       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop checking for shmem property in parent node Sudeep Holla
2020-03-27 16:36   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-04-01  1:19   ` Peng Fan
2020-04-01  1:19     ` Peng Fan
2020-03-31 13:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend SMC/HVC to support multiple channels Peng Fan
2020-03-31 13:53   ` Peng Fan
2020-03-31 14:21   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-03-31 14:21     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200331142148.GA14918@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.