From: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com Subject: [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:58:00 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200406112800.23762-19-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200406112800.23762-1-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros include device information in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from. Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN*. Conversion is done with below semantic patch: @@ identifier func, T; @@ func(struct intel_runtime_pm *T,...) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(T, struct drm_i915_private, runtime_pm); <+... ( -WARN( +drm_WARN(&i915->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON( +drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, ...) | -WARN_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ONCE(&i915->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm, ...) ) ...+> } Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c index ad719c9602af..31ccd0559c55 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ track_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) static void untrack_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, depot_stack_handle_t stack) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); unsigned long flags, n; bool found = false; @@ -134,9 +137,9 @@ static void untrack_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rpm->debug.lock, flags); - if (WARN(!found, - "Unmatched wakeref (tracking %lu), count %u\n", - rpm->debug.count, atomic_read(&rpm->wakeref_count))) { + if (drm_WARN(&i915->drm, !found, + "Unmatched wakeref (tracking %lu), count %u\n", + rpm->debug.count, atomic_read(&rpm->wakeref_count))) { char *buf; buf = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN); @@ -355,10 +358,14 @@ intel_runtime_pm_release(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, int wakelock) static intel_wakeref_t __intel_runtime_pm_get(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, bool wakelock) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); int ret; ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(rpm->kdev); - WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret); + drm_WARN_ONCE(&i915->drm, ret < 0, + "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret); intel_runtime_pm_acquire(rpm, wakelock); @@ -539,6 +546,9 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, intel_wakeref_t wref) */ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); struct device *kdev = rpm->kdev; /* @@ -565,7 +575,8 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(kdev); ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev); - WARN(ret < 0, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret); + drm_WARN(&i915->drm, ret < 0, + "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret); } else { pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(kdev); } @@ -580,11 +591,14 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) void intel_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); struct device *kdev = rpm->kdev; /* Transfer rpm ownership back to core */ - WARN(pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev) < 0, - "Failed to pass rpm ownership back to core\n"); + drm_WARN(&i915->drm, pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev) < 0, + "Failed to pass rpm ownership back to core\n"); pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(kdev); @@ -594,12 +608,15 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) void intel_runtime_pm_driver_release(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); int count = atomic_read(&rpm->wakeref_count); - WARN(count, - "i915 raw-wakerefs=%d wakelocks=%d on cleanup\n", - intel_rpm_raw_wakeref_count(count), - intel_rpm_wakelock_count(count)); + drm_WARN(&i915->drm, count, + "i915 raw-wakerefs=%d wakelocks=%d on cleanup\n", + intel_rpm_raw_wakeref_count(count), + intel_rpm_wakelock_count(count)); untrack_all_intel_runtime_pm_wakerefs(rpm); } -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:58:00 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200406112800.23762-19-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200406112800.23762-1-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros include device information in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from. Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN*. Conversion is done with below semantic patch: @@ identifier func, T; @@ func(struct intel_runtime_pm *T,...) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(T, struct drm_i915_private, runtime_pm); <+... ( -WARN( +drm_WARN(&i915->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON( +drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, ...) | -WARN_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ONCE(&i915->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm, ...) ) ...+> } Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c index ad719c9602af..31ccd0559c55 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ track_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) static void untrack_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, depot_stack_handle_t stack) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); unsigned long flags, n; bool found = false; @@ -134,9 +137,9 @@ static void untrack_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rpm->debug.lock, flags); - if (WARN(!found, - "Unmatched wakeref (tracking %lu), count %u\n", - rpm->debug.count, atomic_read(&rpm->wakeref_count))) { + if (drm_WARN(&i915->drm, !found, + "Unmatched wakeref (tracking %lu), count %u\n", + rpm->debug.count, atomic_read(&rpm->wakeref_count))) { char *buf; buf = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN); @@ -355,10 +358,14 @@ intel_runtime_pm_release(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, int wakelock) static intel_wakeref_t __intel_runtime_pm_get(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, bool wakelock) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); int ret; ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(rpm->kdev); - WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret); + drm_WARN_ONCE(&i915->drm, ret < 0, + "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret); intel_runtime_pm_acquire(rpm, wakelock); @@ -539,6 +546,9 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, intel_wakeref_t wref) */ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); struct device *kdev = rpm->kdev; /* @@ -565,7 +575,8 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(kdev); ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev); - WARN(ret < 0, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret); + drm_WARN(&i915->drm, ret < 0, + "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret); } else { pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(kdev); } @@ -580,11 +591,14 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) void intel_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); struct device *kdev = rpm->kdev; /* Transfer rpm ownership back to core */ - WARN(pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev) < 0, - "Failed to pass rpm ownership back to core\n"); + drm_WARN(&i915->drm, pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev) < 0, + "Failed to pass rpm ownership back to core\n"); pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(kdev); @@ -594,12 +608,15 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_disable(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) void intel_runtime_pm_driver_release(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) { + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(rpm, + struct drm_i915_private, + runtime_pm); int count = atomic_read(&rpm->wakeref_count); - WARN(count, - "i915 raw-wakerefs=%d wakelocks=%d on cleanup\n", - intel_rpm_raw_wakeref_count(count), - intel_rpm_wakelock_count(count)); + drm_WARN(&i915->drm, count, + "i915 raw-wakerefs=%d wakelocks=%d on cleanup\n", + intel_rpm_raw_wakeref_count(count), + intel_rpm_wakelock_count(count)); untrack_all_intel_runtime_pm_wakerefs(rpm); } -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-06 11:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-06 11:27 [PATCH 00/18] Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/display/icl_dsi: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 18:08 ` kbuild test robot 2020-04-06 18:08 ` kbuild test robot 2020-04-06 18:08 ` kbuild test robot 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/display/atomic_plane: " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/display/ddi: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 20:21 ` kbuild test robot 2020-04-06 20:21 ` kbuild test robot 2020-04-06 20:21 ` kbuild test robot 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/display/display: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-21 7:53 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 9:19 ` Imre Deak 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/display/dp: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-21 6:56 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 6:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/display/dpll_mgr: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/display/frontbuffer: " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/display/global_state: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/display/overlay: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/display/sdvo: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-21 6:55 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 6:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/display/tc: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-21 6:57 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi: " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 22:41 ` kbuild test robot 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/gem: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-21 8:30 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/i915_drv: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-21 8:24 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 8:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 9:59 ` Bharadiya,Pankaj 2020-04-21 9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Bharadiya,Pankaj 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/pmu: " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/pm: " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-21 8:26 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 8:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2020-04-06 11:28 ` Pankaj Bharadiya [this message] 2020-04-06 11:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-21 8:28 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 9:48 ` Imre Deak 2020-04-06 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork 2020-04-06 12:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork 2020-04-06 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* (rev2) Patchwork 2020-04-06 15:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2020-04-06 19:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2020-04-21 8:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Jani Nikula 2020-04-21 10:01 ` Bharadiya,Pankaj
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200406112800.23762-19-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \ --to=pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \ --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.