From: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, "Pandruvada\, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, chris.p.wilson@intel.com, "Vivi\, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Subject: [PATCHv2.99 04/11] cpufreq: Define ADAPTIVE frequency governor policy. Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:22:51 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200428032258.2518-5-currojerez@riseup.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200428032258.2518-1-currojerez@riseup.net> This defines a generic policy in addition to the existing PERFORMANCE and POWERSAVE policies. The ADAPTIVE policy is expected to provide a variable trade-off between performance and energy efficiency based on the dynamic behavior of the workload -- E.g. whether the system has a bottleneck on the CPU or another IO device. Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c | 1 + include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 045f9fe157ce..e87285b6294c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -629,6 +629,9 @@ static unsigned int cpufreq_parse_policy(char *str_governor) if (!strncasecmp(str_governor, "powersave", CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN)) return CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE; + if (!strncasecmp(str_governor, "adaptive", CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN)) + return CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE; + return CPUFREQ_POLICY_UNKNOWN; } @@ -750,6 +753,8 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) return sprintf(buf, "powersave\n"); else if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) return sprintf(buf, "performance\n"); + else if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE) + return sprintf(buf, "adaptive\n"); else if (policy->governor) return scnprintf(buf, CPUFREQ_NAME_PLEN, "%s\n", policy->governor->name); @@ -811,7 +816,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_available_governors(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct cpufreq_governor *t; if (!has_target()) { - i += sprintf(buf, "performance powersave"); + i += sprintf(buf, "performance powersave adaptive"); goto out; } @@ -1085,7 +1090,8 @@ static int cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) pol = policy->policy; } if (pol != CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE && - pol != CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE) + pol != CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE && + pol != CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE) return -ENODATA; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c index 1caaec7c280b..cb70f0b7ff7a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static int longrun_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) msr_lo |= 0x00000001; break; case CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE: + case CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE: break; } wrmsr(MSR_TMTA_LONGRUN_FLAGS, msr_lo, msr_hi); diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index f7240251a949..fa63df914f9f 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div, */ #define CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE (1) #define CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE (2) +#define CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE (3) /* * The polling frequency depends on the capability of the processor. Default -- 2.22.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, "Pandruvada\, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, chris.p.wilson@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv2.99 04/11] cpufreq: Define ADAPTIVE frequency governor policy. Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:22:51 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200428032258.2518-5-currojerez@riseup.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200428032258.2518-1-currojerez@riseup.net> This defines a generic policy in addition to the existing PERFORMANCE and POWERSAVE policies. The ADAPTIVE policy is expected to provide a variable trade-off between performance and energy efficiency based on the dynamic behavior of the workload -- E.g. whether the system has a bottleneck on the CPU or another IO device. Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c | 1 + include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 045f9fe157ce..e87285b6294c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -629,6 +629,9 @@ static unsigned int cpufreq_parse_policy(char *str_governor) if (!strncasecmp(str_governor, "powersave", CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN)) return CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE; + if (!strncasecmp(str_governor, "adaptive", CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN)) + return CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE; + return CPUFREQ_POLICY_UNKNOWN; } @@ -750,6 +753,8 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) return sprintf(buf, "powersave\n"); else if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) return sprintf(buf, "performance\n"); + else if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE) + return sprintf(buf, "adaptive\n"); else if (policy->governor) return scnprintf(buf, CPUFREQ_NAME_PLEN, "%s\n", policy->governor->name); @@ -811,7 +816,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_available_governors(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct cpufreq_governor *t; if (!has_target()) { - i += sprintf(buf, "performance powersave"); + i += sprintf(buf, "performance powersave adaptive"); goto out; } @@ -1085,7 +1090,8 @@ static int cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) pol = policy->policy; } if (pol != CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE && - pol != CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE) + pol != CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE && + pol != CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE) return -ENODATA; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c index 1caaec7c280b..cb70f0b7ff7a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static int longrun_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) msr_lo |= 0x00000001; break; case CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE: + case CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE: break; } wrmsr(MSR_TMTA_LONGRUN_FLAGS, msr_lo, msr_hi); diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index f7240251a949..fa63df914f9f 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div, */ #define CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE (1) #define CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE (2) +#define CPUFREQ_POLICY_ADAPTIVE (3) /* * The polling frequency depends on the capability of the processor. Default -- 2.22.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 3:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-28 3:22 [RFC] GPU-bound energy efficiency improvements for the intel_pstate driver (v2.99) Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 01/11] PM: QoS: Add CPU_SCALING_RESPONSE global PM QoS limit Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 02/11] drm/i915: Adjust PM QoS scaling response frequency based on GPU load Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 03/11] OPTIONAL: drm/i915: Expose PM QoS control parameters via debugfs Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` Francisco Jerez [this message] 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv2.99 04/11] cpufreq: Define ADAPTIVE frequency governor policy Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 05/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reorder intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook() and intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook() Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 06/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Call intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook() once from the setpolicy hook Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 07/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement VLP controller statistics and target range calculation Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 08/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement VLP controller for HWP parts Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 09/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable VLP controller based on ACPI FADT profile and CPUID Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 10/11] OPTIONAL: cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add tracing of VLP controller status Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [PATCHv2.99 11/11] OPTIONAL: cpufreq: intel_pstate: Expose VLP controller parameters via debugfs Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-04-28 3:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [PATCHv2.99,01/11] PM: QoS: Add CPU_SCALING_RESPONSE global PM QoS limit Patchwork 2020-05-11 10:57 ` [RFC] GPU-bound energy efficiency improvements for the intel_pstate driver (v2.99) Peter Zijlstra 2020-05-11 10:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Peter Zijlstra 2020-05-11 21:01 ` Francisco Jerez 2020-05-11 21:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-05-14 10:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2020-05-14 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki 2020-05-15 0:48 ` Francisco Jerez 2020-05-15 0:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-05-14 11:50 ` Valentin Schneider 2020-05-14 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Valentin Schneider 2020-05-15 0:48 ` Francisco Jerez 2020-05-15 0:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Francisco Jerez 2020-05-15 18:09 ` Valentin Schneider 2020-05-15 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Valentin Schneider 2020-05-28 9:29 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-05-28 9:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200428032258.2518-5-currojerez@riseup.net \ --to=currojerez@riseup.net \ --cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \ --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.