All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include: dt-bindings: rockchip: mark RK_GPIO defines as deprecated
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:36:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511213605.GA14679@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424151105.18736-1-jbx6244@gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> The defines RK_GPIO0, RK_GPIO1, RK_GPIO2, RK_GPIO3,
> RK_GPIO4 and RK_GPIO6 are no longer used. Mark them as
> "deprecated" to prevent that someone start using them again.

What changed exactly? The binding changed, or just using raw 0-6 instead 
of the defines? 

If there's not anything using these in tree, just delete them.

It is still used in the binding doc.

Rob

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include: dt-bindings: rockchip: mark RK_GPIO defines as deprecated
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:36:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511213605.GA14679@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424151105.18736-1-jbx6244-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> The defines RK_GPIO0, RK_GPIO1, RK_GPIO2, RK_GPIO3,
> RK_GPIO4 and RK_GPIO6 are no longer used. Mark them as
> "deprecated" to prevent that someone start using them again.

What changed exactly? The binding changed, or just using raw 0-6 instead 
of the defines? 

If there's not anything using these in tree, just delete them.

It is still used in the binding doc.

Rob

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include: dt-bindings: rockchip: mark RK_GPIO defines as deprecated
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:36:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511213605.GA14679@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424151105.18736-1-jbx6244@gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> The defines RK_GPIO0, RK_GPIO1, RK_GPIO2, RK_GPIO3,
> RK_GPIO4 and RK_GPIO6 are no longer used. Mark them as
> "deprecated" to prevent that someone start using them again.

What changed exactly? The binding changed, or just using raw 0-6 instead 
of the defines? 

If there's not anything using these in tree, just delete them.

It is still used in the binding doc.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-11 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24 15:11 [PATCH] include: dt-bindings: rockchip: mark RK_GPIO defines as deprecated Johan Jonker
2020-04-24 15:11 ` Johan Jonker
2020-04-24 15:11 ` Johan Jonker
2020-05-11 21:36 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2020-05-11 21:36   ` Rob Herring
2020-05-11 21:36   ` Rob Herring
2020-05-12  1:09   ` Heiko Stübner
2020-05-12  1:09     ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200511213605.GA14679@bogus \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.