All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ricardo Cañuelo" <ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jason@lakedaemon.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dt-bindings: display: ti,tfp410.txt: convert to yaml
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 13:09:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513110957.dgb3axle24pmqp3a@rcn-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506155320.GC15206@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

Hi Laurent,

On mié 06-05-2020 18:53:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I didn't if I remember correctly, I just mapped it to the hardware
> features. The hardware register indeed takes a value between 0 and 7,
> and that is mapped to [-4,3] x t(STEP). I don't mind either option.

I was taking a look at the ti-tfp410.c driver to see if it needs any
changes to support the updated deskew property ranges [0-7], but I don't
fully understand what this does (line 276):

	/* Get the setup and hold time from vendor-specific properties. */
	of_property_read_u32(dvi->dev->of_node, "ti,deskew", (u32 *)&deskew);
	if (deskew < -4 || deskew > 3)
		return -EINVAL;

	timings->setup_time_ps = min(0, 1200 - 350 * deskew);
	timings->hold_time_ps = min(0, 1300 + 350 * deskew);

It looks like that the driver doesn't really apply the deskew settings
to the device and that this has not been really tested, so it's probably
not a big deal.

I guess what you wanted to do was to adjust the setup and hold times
around 1200 and 1300 ps respectively in increments/decrements of 350 ps
depending on the deskew value, as the datasheet describes. But this code
would set timings->setup_time_ps to 0 regardless of the deskew value,
and timings->hold_time_ps would be either 0 or a very big integer value
if deskew is -4 (both setup_time_ps and hold_time_ps are u32).

Am I missing something? Was this intentional?

Thanks,
Ricardo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ricardo Cañuelo" <ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dt-bindings: display: ti,tfp410.txt: convert to yaml
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 13:09:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513110957.dgb3axle24pmqp3a@rcn-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506155320.GC15206@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

Hi Laurent,

On mié 06-05-2020 18:53:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I didn't if I remember correctly, I just mapped it to the hardware
> features. The hardware register indeed takes a value between 0 and 7,
> and that is mapped to [-4,3] x t(STEP). I don't mind either option.

I was taking a look at the ti-tfp410.c driver to see if it needs any
changes to support the updated deskew property ranges [0-7], but I don't
fully understand what this does (line 276):

	/* Get the setup and hold time from vendor-specific properties. */
	of_property_read_u32(dvi->dev->of_node, "ti,deskew", (u32 *)&deskew);
	if (deskew < -4 || deskew > 3)
		return -EINVAL;

	timings->setup_time_ps = min(0, 1200 - 350 * deskew);
	timings->hold_time_ps = min(0, 1300 + 350 * deskew);

It looks like that the driver doesn't really apply the deskew settings
to the device and that this has not been really tested, so it's probably
not a big deal.

I guess what you wanted to do was to adjust the setup and hold times
around 1200 and 1300 ps respectively in increments/decrements of 350 ps
depending on the deskew value, as the datasheet describes. But this code
would set timings->setup_time_ps to 0 regardless of the deskew value,
and timings->hold_time_ps would be either 0 or a very big integer value
if deskew is -4 (both setup_time_ps and hold_time_ps are u32).

Am I missing something? Was this intentional?

Thanks,
Ricardo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ricardo Cañuelo" <ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dt-bindings: display: ti,tfp410.txt: convert to yaml
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 13:09:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513110957.dgb3axle24pmqp3a@rcn-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506155320.GC15206@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

Hi Laurent,

On mié 06-05-2020 18:53:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I didn't if I remember correctly, I just mapped it to the hardware
> features. The hardware register indeed takes a value between 0 and 7,
> and that is mapped to [-4,3] x t(STEP). I don't mind either option.

I was taking a look at the ti-tfp410.c driver to see if it needs any
changes to support the updated deskew property ranges [0-7], but I don't
fully understand what this does (line 276):

	/* Get the setup and hold time from vendor-specific properties. */
	of_property_read_u32(dvi->dev->of_node, "ti,deskew", (u32 *)&deskew);
	if (deskew < -4 || deskew > 3)
		return -EINVAL;

	timings->setup_time_ps = min(0, 1200 - 350 * deskew);
	timings->hold_time_ps = min(0, 1300 + 350 * deskew);

It looks like that the driver doesn't really apply the deskew settings
to the device and that this has not been really tested, so it's probably
not a big deal.

I guess what you wanted to do was to adjust the setup and hold times
around 1200 and 1300 ps respectively in increments/decrements of 350 ps
depending on the deskew value, as the datasheet describes. But this code
would set timings->setup_time_ps to 0 regardless of the deskew value,
and timings->hold_time_ps would be either 0 or a very big integer value
if deskew is -4 (both setup_time_ps and hold_time_ps are u32).

Am I missing something? Was this intentional?

Thanks,
Ricardo
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-13 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-28  9:20 [RFC PATCH] dt-bindings: display: ti,tfp410.txt: convert to yaml Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-04-28  9:20 ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-04-28  9:20 ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-04-28  9:49 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-04-28  9:49   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-04-28  9:49   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-05-06  7:21   ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-06  7:21     ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-06  7:21     ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-06  8:01     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-05-06  8:01       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-05-06  8:01       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-05-06  8:28       ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-06  8:28         ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-06  8:28         ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-06  8:33         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-05-06  8:33           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-05-06  8:33           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-05-06 15:53   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-05-06 15:53     ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-05-06 15:53     ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-05-11 14:59     ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-11 14:59       ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-11 14:59       ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-11 16:26       ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-05-11 16:26         ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-05-11 16:26         ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-05-12  2:09       ` Rob Herring
2020-05-12  2:09         ` Rob Herring
2020-05-12  2:09         ` Rob Herring
2020-05-13 11:09     ` Ricardo Cañuelo [this message]
2020-05-13 11:09       ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-13 11:09       ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-13 14:08       ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-05-13 14:08         ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-05-13 14:08         ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-05-13 14:20         ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-13 14:20           ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-05-13 14:20           ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-04-28 19:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-04-28 19:21   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-04-28 19:21   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-04-29  8:54   ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-04-29  8:54     ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-04-29  8:54     ` Ricardo Cañuelo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200513110957.dgb3axle24pmqp3a@rcn-XPS-13-9360 \
    --to=ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.