All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com>
Cc: "maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yangbo.lu@nxp.com" <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>,
	"john.stultz@linaro.org" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"sean.j.christopherson@intel.com"
	<sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>,
	Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 10/11] arm64: add mechanism to let user choose which counter to return
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 23:16:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525061622.GA13679@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0802MB25552E7C792D3BB9CBE2D2C7F4B30@HE1PR0802MB2555.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:50:28AM +0000, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> How about adding an extra argument in struct ptp_clock_info to serve as a flag, then we can control this flag using IOCTL to determine the counter type.

no, No, NO!

> > From your description, this "flag" really should be a module parameter.
> Maybe use flag as a module parameter is a better way.

Yes.

Thanks,
Richard

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com>
Cc: Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sean.j.christopherson@intel.com"
	<sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"john.stultz@linaro.org" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	"yangbo.lu@nxp.com" <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 10/11] arm64: add mechanism to let user choose which counter to return
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 23:16:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525061622.GA13679@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0802MB25552E7C792D3BB9CBE2D2C7F4B30@HE1PR0802MB2555.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:50:28AM +0000, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> How about adding an extra argument in struct ptp_clock_info to serve as a flag, then we can control this flag using IOCTL to determine the counter type.

no, No, NO!

> > From your description, this "flag" really should be a module parameter.
> Maybe use flag as a module parameter is a better way.

Yes.

Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	"maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
	Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sean.j.christopherson@intel.com"
	<sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>, Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"john.stultz@linaro.org" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	"yangbo.lu@nxp.com" <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 10/11] arm64: add mechanism to let user choose which counter to return
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 23:16:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525061622.GA13679@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0802MB25552E7C792D3BB9CBE2D2C7F4B30@HE1PR0802MB2555.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:50:28AM +0000, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> How about adding an extra argument in struct ptp_clock_info to serve as a flag, then we can control this flag using IOCTL to determine the counter type.

no, No, NO!

> > From your description, this "flag" really should be a module parameter.
> Maybe use flag as a module parameter is a better way.

Yes.

Thanks,
Richard

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-25  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-22  8:37 [RFC PATCH v12 0/11] Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 01/11] arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor services during boot Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 02/11] arm/arm64: KVM: Advertise KVM UID to guests via SMCCC Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 03/11] psci: export smccc conduit get helper Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22 13:12   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-22 13:12     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-22 13:12     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-25  1:37     ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  1:37       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  1:37       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-26 10:10       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-26 10:10         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-26 10:10         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-27  1:18         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-27  1:18           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-27  1:18           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 04/11] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 05/11] time: Add mechanism to recognize clocksource in time_get_snapshot Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-23  3:35   ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-28 16:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-28 16:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-28 16:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-29  1:05     ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-29  1:05       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-29  1:05       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 06/11] clocksource: Add clocksource id for arm arch counter Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 07/11] psci: Add hypercall service for kvm ptp Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22 14:18   ` Steven Price
2020-05-22 14:18     ` Steven Price
2020-05-22 14:18     ` Steven Price
2020-05-25  2:11     ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  2:11       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  2:11       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-26 11:02       ` Steven Price
2020-05-26 11:02         ` Steven Price
2020-05-26 11:02         ` Steven Price
2020-05-27  6:06         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-27  6:06           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-27  6:06           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 08/11] ptp: arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64 Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-26 14:24   ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 09/11] ptp: extend input argument for getcrosstimestamp API Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-24  1:42   ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-24  1:42     ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-24  1:42     ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 10/11] arm64: add mechanism to let user choose which counter to return Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-24  1:47   ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-24  1:47     ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-24  1:47     ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-24  2:11   ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-24  2:11     ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-24  2:11     ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-25  4:50     ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  4:50       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  4:50       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  6:16       ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2020-05-25  6:16         ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-25  6:16         ` Richard Cochran
2020-05-25  6:29         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  6:29           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  6:29           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25  9:17     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-25  9:17       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-25  9:17       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-25 14:18       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25 14:18         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25 14:18         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-25 15:28         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-25 15:28           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-25 15:28           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-22  8:37 ` [RFC PATCH v12 11/11] arm64: Add kvm capability check extension for ptp_kvm Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-05-22  8:37   ` Jianyong Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200525061622.GA13679@localhost \
    --to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jianyong.Wu@arm.com \
    --cc=Justin.He@arm.com \
    --cc=Kaly.Xin@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
    --cc=Steven.Price@arm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=Wei.Chen@arm.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.