All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
@ 2020-05-26  9:48 Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2020-05-26 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy @ 2020-05-26  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: chris

Previous patch didn't take into account all pipes
but only those in state, which could cause wrong
CDCLK conclcusions and calculations.
Also there was a severe issue with min_cdclk being
assigned to 0 every compare cycle.

Too bad this was found by me only after merge.
This could be also causing the issues in test, however
not clear - anyway marking this as fixing the
"Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs".

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Fixes: cd1915460861 ("Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs")
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c      | 51 ++++++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c   | 19 +++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 26 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
index a79bd7aeb03b..8096138abecc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
@@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
 	int max_bw = 0;
 	int slice_id;
+	enum pipe pipe;
 	int i;
 
 	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
@@ -447,7 +448,9 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
 			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
 
-		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
+		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
+
+		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
 
 		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
 
@@ -478,6 +481,15 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
 				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
 		}
+	}
+
+	if (!old_bw_state)
+		return 0;
+
+	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
+		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
+
+		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
 
 		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
 			/*
@@ -490,14 +502,9 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 			 */
 			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
 		}
-
-		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
-
-		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
 	}
 
-	if (!old_bw_state)
-		return 0;
+	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
 
 	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
 		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
@@ -511,34 +518,38 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 
 int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 {
-	int i;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
+	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
 	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
 	int min_cdclk = 0;
-	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
-	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
+	enum pipe pipe;
+	int i;
 
 	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
-		struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
-
 		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
 		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
 			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
 
-		cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_cdclk_state(state);
-		if (IS_ERR(cdclk_state))
-			return PTR_ERR(cdclk_state);
-
-		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
-
-		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
-
 		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
 	}
 
 	if (!old_bw_state)
 		return 0;
 
+	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
+		struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
+
+		cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
+		if (!cdclk_state)
+			return 0;
+
+		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
+	}
+
+	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
+
 	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
 		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index f9b0fc7317de..08468b121d02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -2084,9 +2084,12 @@ int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
 {
 	struct intel_atomic_state *state = cdclk_state->base.state;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+	struct intel_bw_state *bw_state = NULL;
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
 	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
 	int min_cdclk, i;
+	enum pipe pipe;
 
 	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
 		int ret;
@@ -2095,6 +2098,10 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
 		if (min_cdclk < 0)
 			return min_cdclk;
 
+		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
+		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
+			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
+
 		if (cdclk_state->min_cdclk[i] == min_cdclk)
 			continue;
 
@@ -2106,15 +2113,11 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
 	}
 
 	min_cdclk = cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk;
+	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
+		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
 
-	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
-		struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
-
-		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
-
-		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
-		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
-			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
+		if (!bw_state)
+			continue;
 
 		min_cdclk = max(bw_state->min_cdclk, min_cdclk);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index f40b909952cc..66af8f3053ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -14708,13 +14708,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 				    bool *need_cdclk_calc)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
-	int i;
+	struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
 	struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
+	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
 	struct intel_plane *plane;
+	int min_cdclk = 0;
+	enum pipe pipe;
 	int ret;
-	struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
-	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
-	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
+	int i;
 	/*
 	 * active_planes bitmask has been updated, and potentially
 	 * affected planes are part of the state. We can now
@@ -14735,23 +14736,18 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (!new_cdclk_state)
-		return 0;
-
-	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
-		struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
-		int min_cdclk = 0;
+	new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
 
-		min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
+	if (!new_cdclk_state || !new_bw_state)
+		return 0;
 
-		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
-		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
-			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
+	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
+		min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
 
 		/*
 		 * Currently do this change only if we need to increase
 		 */
-		if (bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
+		if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
 			*need_cdclk_calc = true;
 	}
 
-- 
2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
  2020-05-26  9:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes Stanislav Lisovskiy
@ 2020-05-26 10:46 ` Patchwork
  2020-05-26 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-05-26 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77654/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8537 -> Patchwork_17776
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/index.html

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_17776 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
    - fi-kbl-guc:         [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109271])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
    - fi-glk-dsi:         [TIMEOUT][3] ([i915#1288]) -> [PASS][4]
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html

  
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#1288]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1288


Participating hosts (50 -> 44)
------------------------------

  Missing    (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_8537 -> Patchwork_17776

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_8537: 05a47cd761c49c3fa87648c30df0fd4d64b0b8c5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5678: c1f30ee09ac2e7eb3e8e90245239731a169a6050 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_17776: ac70e0df58bb143436d9fc1229484d87661b4638 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

ac70e0df58bb drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
  2020-05-26  9:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2020-05-26 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2020-05-26 13:40 ` Patchwork
  2020-05-29 23:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] " Manasi Navare
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-05-26 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77654/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8537_full -> Patchwork_17776_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_17776_full:

### Piglit changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-bitand-not-uvec4-uint (NEW):
    - {pig-icl-1065g7}:   NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1] +7 similar issues
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/pig-icl-1065g7/spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-bitand-not-uvec4-uint.html

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-ne-ivec2-ivec2-using-if (NEW):
    - {pig-icl-1065g7}:   NOTRUN -> [CRASH][2]
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/pig-icl-1065g7/spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-ne-ivec2-ivec2-using-if.html

  
New tests
---------

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_8537_full and Patchwork_17776_full:

### New Piglit tests (9) ###

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-greaterthanequal-uvec3-uvec3:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-add-mat2x4-mat2x4:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-bitand-not-uvec4-uint:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-mult-int-ivec2:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-ne-ivec2-ivec2-using-if:
    - Statuses : 1 crash(s)
    - Exec time: [0.39] s

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-ne-vec3-vec3-using-if:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-rshift-ivec2-uvec2:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-selection-bool-uvec2-uvec2:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@glsl-4.30@execution@built-in-functions@cs-op-sub-float-mat2x4:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_17776_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#180]) +1 similar issue
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-glk7/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-glk4/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-64bpp-rotate-180:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#1119] / [i915#118] / [i915#95]) +1 similar issue
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-glk4/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-64bpp-rotate-180.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-glk8/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-64bpp-rotate-180.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10] ([i915#180]) +1 similar issue
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-apl3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-apl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#54]) +2 similar issues
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-skl9/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#1188])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-skl8/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-skl4/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][15] -> [INCOMPLETE][16] ([i915#69])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-skl9/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_suspend:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][17] -> [SKIP][18] ([fdo#109441]) +3 similar issues
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_suspend.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr@psr2_suspend.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([i915#31])
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-apl3/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-apl4/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_suspend@forcewake:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][21] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][22] +1 similar issue
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-apl6/igt@i915_suspend@forcewake.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-apl2/igt@i915_suspend@forcewake.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-64bpp-rotate-0:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][23] ([i915#1119] / [i915#118] / [i915#95]) -> [PASS][24]
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-glk8/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-64bpp-rotate-0.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-glk2/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-64bpp-rotate-0.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-toggle:
    - shard-glk:          [DMESG-WARN][25] ([i915#1926]) -> [PASS][26]
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-glk2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-toggle.html
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-glk8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-toggle.html

  * {igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@c-dp1}:
    - shard-kbl:          [DMESG-WARN][27] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][28] +4 similar issues
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@c-dp1.html
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@c-dp1.html

  * {igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-dp1}:
    - shard-kbl:          [FAIL][29] ([i915#1928]) -> [PASS][30]
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-dp1.html
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-dp1.html

  * {igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-edp1}:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][31] ([i915#1928]) -> [PASS][32]
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-skl5/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-edp1.html
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-skl1/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-edp1.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][33] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) -> [PASS][34]
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-skl9/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][35] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][36] +2 similar issues
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu.html
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu.html

  * {igt@perf@polling-parameterized}:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][37] ([i915#1542]) -> [PASS][38]
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-iclb7/igt@perf@polling-parameterized.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-iclb5/igt@perf@polling-parameterized.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc3co-vpb-simulation:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][39] ([i915#588]) -> [SKIP][40] ([i915#658])
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc3co-vpb-simulation.html
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-iclb1/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc3co-vpb-simulation.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@atomic-dpms:
    - shard-apl:          [TIMEOUT][41] ([i915#1319] / [i915#1635]) -> [FAIL][42] ([fdo#110321] / [fdo#110336])
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-apl2/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic-dpms.html
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-apl7/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic-dpms.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@lic:
    - shard-apl:          [TIMEOUT][43] ([i915#1319] / [i915#1635]) -> [FAIL][44] ([fdo#110321]) +1 similar issue
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8537/shard-apl4/igt@kms_content_protection@lic.html
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/shard-apl6/igt@kms_content_protection@lic.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
  [fdo#110321]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110321
  [fdo#110336]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110336
  [i915#1119]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1119
  [i915#118]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/118
  [i915#1188]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1188
  [i915#1319]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1319
  [i915#1436]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1436
  [i915#1542]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1542
  [i915#1635]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1635
  [i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180
  [i915#1926]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1926
  [i915#1928]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1928
  [i915#1930]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1930
  [i915#1937]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1937
  [i915#265]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/265
  [i915#31]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/31
  [i915#54]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/54
  [i915#588]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/588
  [i915#658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/658
  [i915#69]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/69
  [i915#716]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/716
  [i915#95]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/95


Participating hosts (11 -> 11)
------------------------------

  No changes in participating hosts


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_8537 -> Patchwork_17776

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_8537: 05a47cd761c49c3fa87648c30df0fd4d64b0b8c5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5678: c1f30ee09ac2e7eb3e8e90245239731a169a6050 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_17776: ac70e0df58bb143436d9fc1229484d87661b4638 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17776/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
  2020-05-26  9:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2020-05-26 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2020-05-26 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
@ 2020-05-29 23:57 ` Manasi Navare
  2020-06-01  7:49   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
  2020-05-31 20:03   ` kbuild test robot
  2020-06-01 14:01   ` Dan Carpenter
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2020-05-29 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx, chris

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:48:52PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Previous patch didn't take into account all pipes
> but only those in state, which could cause wrong
> CDCLK conclcusions and calculations.
> Also there was a severe issue with min_cdclk being
> assigned to 0 every compare cycle.
> 
> Too bad this was found by me only after merge.
> This could be also causing the issues in test, however
> not clear - anyway marking this as fixing the
> "Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Fixes: cd1915460861 ("Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs")
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c      | 51 ++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c   | 19 +++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 26 +++++-----
>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index a79bd7aeb03b..8096138abecc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	int max_bw = 0;
>  	int slice_id;
> +	enum pipe pipe;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> @@ -447,7 +448,9 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
>  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
>  
> -		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> +		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> +
> +		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
>  
>  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
>  
> @@ -478,6 +481,15 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
>  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
>  		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!old_bw_state)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> +		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
> +

So the condition !old_bw_state() will make sure we loop through
only the active pipes and compute crtc_bw only for those right?

Manasi

> +		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
>  
>  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
>  			/*
> @@ -490,14 +502,9 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  			 */
>  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
>  		}
> -
> -		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
> -
> -		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!old_bw_state)
> -		return 0;
> +	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
>  
>  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
>  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> @@ -511,34 +518,38 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  
>  int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  {
> -	int i;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> +	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	int min_cdclk = 0;
> -	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> -	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> +	enum pipe pipe;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> -		struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
> -
>  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
>  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
>  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
>  
> -		cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_cdclk_state(state);
> -		if (IS_ERR(cdclk_state))
> -			return PTR_ERR(cdclk_state);
> -
> -		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> -
> -		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
> -
>  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!old_bw_state)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> +		struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
> +
> +		cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
> +		if (!cdclk_state)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
> +	}
> +
> +	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
> +
>  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
>  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index f9b0fc7317de..08468b121d02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -2084,9 +2084,12 @@ int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_atomic_state *state = cdclk_state->base.state;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +	struct intel_bw_state *bw_state = NULL;
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>  	int min_cdclk, i;
> +	enum pipe pipe;
>  
>  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
>  		int ret;
> @@ -2095,6 +2098,10 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
>  		if (min_cdclk < 0)
>  			return min_cdclk;
>  
> +		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> +		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> +			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> +
>  		if (cdclk_state->min_cdclk[i] == min_cdclk)
>  			continue;
>  
> @@ -2106,15 +2113,11 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
>  	}
>  
>  	min_cdclk = cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk;
> +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> +		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
>  
> -	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> -		struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> -
> -		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> -
> -		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> -		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> -			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> +		if (!bw_state)
> +			continue;
>  
>  		min_cdclk = max(bw_state->min_cdclk, min_cdclk);
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index f40b909952cc..66af8f3053ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -14708,13 +14708,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  				    bool *need_cdclk_calc)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> -	int i;
> +	struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
>  	struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
> +	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
>  	struct intel_plane *plane;
> +	int min_cdclk = 0;
> +	enum pipe pipe;
>  	int ret;
> -	struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
> -	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> -	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> +	int i;
>  	/*
>  	 * active_planes bitmask has been updated, and potentially
>  	 * affected planes are part of the state. We can now
> @@ -14735,23 +14736,18 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (!new_cdclk_state)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
> -		struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> -		int min_cdclk = 0;
> +	new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
>  
> -		min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> +	if (!new_cdclk_state || !new_bw_state)
> +		return 0;
>  
> -		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> -		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> -			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> +		min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Currently do this change only if we need to increase
>  		 */
> -		if (bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
> +		if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
>  			*need_cdclk_calc = true;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
  2020-05-26  9:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes Stanislav Lisovskiy
@ 2020-05-31 20:03   ` kbuild test robot
  2020-05-26 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
                     ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-05-31 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy, intel-gfx; +Cc: kbuild-all, chris

Hi Stanislav,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[also build test WARNING on drm-intel/drm-intel-next-queued]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next v5.7-rc7 next-20200529]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stanislav-Lisovskiy/drm-i915-Fix-wrong-CDCLK-adjustment-changes/20200526-180642
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>


cppcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c:453:36: warning: Uninitialized variable: pipe [uninitvar]
     crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
                                      ^

vim +453 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c

   430	
   431	int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
   432	{
   433		struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
   434		struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
   435		struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
   436		const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
   437		struct intel_crtc *crtc;
   438		int max_bw = 0;
   439		int slice_id;
   440		enum pipe pipe;
   441		int i;
   442	
   443		for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
   444			enum plane_id plane_id;
   445			struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
   446	
   447			new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
   448			if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
   449				return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
   450	
   451			old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
   452	
 > 453			crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
   454	
   455			memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
   456	
   457			for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
   458				const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
   459					&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
   460				const struct skl_ddb_entry *uv_plane_alloc =
   461					&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
   462				unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
   463				unsigned int dbuf_mask = 0;
   464	
   465				dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, plane_alloc);
   466				dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, uv_plane_alloc);
   467	
   468				/*
   469				 * FIXME: To calculate that more properly we probably
   470				 * need to to split per plane data_rate into data_rate_y
   471				 * and data_rate_uv for multiplanar formats in order not
   472				 * to get accounted those twice if they happen to reside
   473				 * on different slices.
   474				 * However for pre-icl this would work anyway because
   475				 * we have only single slice and for icl+ uv plane has
   476				 * non-zero data rate.
   477				 * So in worst case those calculation are a bit
   478				 * pessimistic, which shouldn't pose any significant
   479				 * problem anyway.
   480				 */
   481				for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
   482					crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
   483			}
   484		}
   485	
   486		if (!old_bw_state)
   487			return 0;
   488	
   489		for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
   490			struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
   491	
   492			crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
   493	
   494			for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
   495				/*
   496				 * Current experimental observations show that contrary
   497				 * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
   498				 * for slices in total.
   499				 * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
   500				 * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
   501				 * to this formula for  overall bw consumed by slices.
   502				 */
   503				max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
   504			}
   505		}
   506	
   507		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
   508	
   509		if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
   510			int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
   511	
   512			if (ret)
   513				return ret;
   514		}
   515	
   516		return 0;
   517	}
   518	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
@ 2020-05-31 20:03   ` kbuild test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-05-31 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4576 bytes --]

Hi Stanislav,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[also build test WARNING on drm-intel/drm-intel-next-queued]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next v5.7-rc7 next-20200529]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stanislav-Lisovskiy/drm-i915-Fix-wrong-CDCLK-adjustment-changes/20200526-180642
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>


cppcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c:453:36: warning: Uninitialized variable: pipe [uninitvar]
     crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
                                      ^

vim +453 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c

   430	
   431	int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
   432	{
   433		struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
   434		struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
   435		struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
   436		const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
   437		struct intel_crtc *crtc;
   438		int max_bw = 0;
   439		int slice_id;
   440		enum pipe pipe;
   441		int i;
   442	
   443		for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
   444			enum plane_id plane_id;
   445			struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
   446	
   447			new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
   448			if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
   449				return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
   450	
   451			old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
   452	
 > 453			crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
   454	
   455			memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
   456	
   457			for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
   458				const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
   459					&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
   460				const struct skl_ddb_entry *uv_plane_alloc =
   461					&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
   462				unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
   463				unsigned int dbuf_mask = 0;
   464	
   465				dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, plane_alloc);
   466				dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, uv_plane_alloc);
   467	
   468				/*
   469				 * FIXME: To calculate that more properly we probably
   470				 * need to to split per plane data_rate into data_rate_y
   471				 * and data_rate_uv for multiplanar formats in order not
   472				 * to get accounted those twice if they happen to reside
   473				 * on different slices.
   474				 * However for pre-icl this would work anyway because
   475				 * we have only single slice and for icl+ uv plane has
   476				 * non-zero data rate.
   477				 * So in worst case those calculation are a bit
   478				 * pessimistic, which shouldn't pose any significant
   479				 * problem anyway.
   480				 */
   481				for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
   482					crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
   483			}
   484		}
   485	
   486		if (!old_bw_state)
   487			return 0;
   488	
   489		for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
   490			struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
   491	
   492			crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
   493	
   494			for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
   495				/*
   496				 * Current experimental observations show that contrary
   497				 * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
   498				 * for slices in total.
   499				 * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
   500				 * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
   501				 * to this formula for  overall bw consumed by slices.
   502				 */
   503				max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
   504			}
   505		}
   506	
   507		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
   508	
   509		if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
   510			int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
   511	
   512			if (ret)
   513				return ret;
   514		}
   515	
   516		return 0;
   517	}
   518	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
  2020-05-29 23:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] " Manasi Navare
@ 2020-06-01  7:49   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
  2020-06-01 20:37     ` Manasi Navare
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav @ 2020-06-01  7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx, chris

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:57:38PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:48:52PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > Previous patch didn't take into account all pipes
> > but only those in state, which could cause wrong
> > CDCLK conclcusions and calculations.
> > Also there was a severe issue with min_cdclk being
> > assigned to 0 every compare cycle.
> > 
> > Too bad this was found by me only after merge.
> > This could be also causing the issues in test, however
> > not clear - anyway marking this as fixing the
> > "Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> > Fixes: cd1915460861 ("Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs")
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c      | 51 ++++++++++++--------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c   | 19 +++++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 26 +++++-----
> >  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > index a79bd7aeb03b..8096138abecc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > @@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >  	int max_bw = 0;
> >  	int slice_id;
> > +	enum pipe pipe;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> >  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > @@ -447,7 +448,9 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> >  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
> >  
> > -		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> > +		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> > +
> > +		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> >  
> >  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
> >  
> > @@ -478,6 +481,15 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
> >  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
> >  		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (!old_bw_state)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > +		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
> > +
> 
> So the condition !old_bw_state() will make sure we loop through
> only the active pipes and compute crtc_bw only for those right?
> 
> Manasi

Well, in fact this condition just checks if we had any crtcs in state - 
otherwise there were no changes, so bw_state global object doesn't need
to be changed. Whenever something happens to crtc we should have it
in the state, so this condition just checks if we need to modify bw_state
or not. 

Regarding active/inactive pipes - currently for inactive pipes,
we are going to get 0 dbuf slice mask, so we just won't accumulate any data
rate for those. So if the pipe got disabled we will get less required min_cdclk
which against old_bw_state, which will mean that we are going to acquire
the global state lock for writing.

In fact we could optimize the code by skipping inactive pipes completely 
i.e don't even calculate dbuf slice mask,
which will be 0. However the logic and the end result would be
the same anyway.

Stan

> 
> > +		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> >  
> >  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
> >  			/*
> > @@ -490,14 +502,9 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  			 */
> >  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
> >  		}
> > -
> > -		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
> > -
> > -		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (!old_bw_state)
> > -		return 0;
> > +	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
> >  
> >  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
> >  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> > @@ -511,34 +518,38 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  
> >  int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  {
> > -	int i;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> > +	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> > +	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> >  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >  	int min_cdclk = 0;
> > -	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> > -	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> > +	enum pipe pipe;
> > +	int i;
> >  
> >  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > -		struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
> > -
> >  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> >  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> >  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
> >  
> > -		cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_cdclk_state(state);
> > -		if (IS_ERR(cdclk_state))
> > -			return PTR_ERR(cdclk_state);
> > -
> > -		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> > -
> > -		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
> > -
> >  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (!old_bw_state)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > +		struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
> > +
> > +		cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
> > +		if (!cdclk_state)
> > +			return 0;
> > +
> > +		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
> > +
> >  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
> >  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > index f9b0fc7317de..08468b121d02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -2084,9 +2084,12 @@ int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_atomic_state *state = cdclk_state->base.state;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> > +	struct intel_bw_state *bw_state = NULL;
> >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >  	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> >  	int min_cdclk, i;
> > +	enum pipe pipe;
> >  
> >  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> >  		int ret;
> > @@ -2095,6 +2098,10 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> >  		if (min_cdclk < 0)
> >  			return min_cdclk;
> >  
> > +		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> > +			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> > +
> >  		if (cdclk_state->min_cdclk[i] == min_cdclk)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > @@ -2106,15 +2113,11 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	min_cdclk = cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk;
> > +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > +		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
> >  
> > -	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > -		struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> > -
> > -		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> > -
> > -		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> > -		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> > -			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> > +		if (!bw_state)
> > +			continue;
> >  
> >  		min_cdclk = max(bw_state->min_cdclk, min_cdclk);
> >  	}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index f40b909952cc..66af8f3053ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -14708,13 +14708,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >  				    bool *need_cdclk_calc)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> > -	int i;
> > +	struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
> >  	struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
> > +	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
> >  	struct intel_plane *plane;
> > +	int min_cdclk = 0;
> > +	enum pipe pipe;
> >  	int ret;
> > -	struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
> > -	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > -	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > +	int i;
> >  	/*
> >  	 * active_planes bitmask has been updated, and potentially
> >  	 * affected planes are part of the state. We can now
> > @@ -14735,23 +14736,18 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	if (!new_cdclk_state)
> > -		return 0;
> > -
> > -	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
> > -		struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> > -		int min_cdclk = 0;
> > +	new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
> >  
> > -		min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> > +	if (!new_cdclk_state || !new_bw_state)
> > +		return 0;
> >  
> > -		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> > -		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> > -			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> > +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > +		min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
> >  
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Currently do this change only if we need to increase
> >  		 */
> > -		if (bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
> > +		if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
> >  			*need_cdclk_calc = true;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
> > 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
  2020-05-26  9:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2020-05-26 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2020-06-01 14:01   ` Dan Carpenter
  2020-05-29 23:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] " Manasi Navare
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2020-06-01 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild, Stanislav Lisovskiy, intel-gfx; +Cc: kbuild-all, chris

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8327 bytes --]

Hi Stanislav,

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stanislav-Lisovskiy/drm-i915-Fix-wrong-CDCLK-adjustment-changes/20200526-180642
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
config: i386-randconfig-m021-20200531 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c:453 skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk() error: uninitialized symbol 'pipe'.

# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git remote update linux-review
git checkout 21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
vim +/pipe +453 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c

366b6200f76e0f Jani Nikula         2019-08-06  430  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  431  int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  432  {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  433  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  434  	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  435  	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  436  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  437  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  438  	int max_bw = 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  439  	int slice_id;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  440  	enum pipe pipe;
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  441  	int i;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  442  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  443  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  444  		enum plane_id plane_id;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  445  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  446  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  447  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  448  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  449  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  450  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  451  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  452  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26 @453  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
                                                                                                 ^^^^
Not initialized.  Probably "i" was intended?

cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  454  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  455  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  456  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  457  		for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  458  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  459  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  460  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *uv_plane_alloc =
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  461  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  462  			unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  463  			unsigned int dbuf_mask = 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  464  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  465  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, plane_alloc);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  466  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, uv_plane_alloc);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  467  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  468  			/*
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  469  			 * FIXME: To calculate that more properly we probably
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  470  			 * need to to split per plane data_rate into data_rate_y
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  471  			 * and data_rate_uv for multiplanar formats in order not
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  472  			 * to get accounted those twice if they happen to reside
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  473  			 * on different slices.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  474  			 * However for pre-icl this would work anyway because
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  475  			 * we have only single slice and for icl+ uv plane has
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  476  			 * non-zero data rate.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  477  			 * So in worst case those calculation are a bit
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  478  			 * pessimistic, which shouldn't pose any significant
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  479  			 * problem anyway.
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  480  			 */
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  481  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  482  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  483  		}
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  484  	}
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  485  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  486  	if (!old_bw_state)
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  487  		return 0;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  488  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  489  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  490  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  491  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  492  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  493  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  494  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  495  			/*
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  496  			 * Current experimental observations show that contrary
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  497  			 * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  498  			 * for slices in total.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  499  			 * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  500  			 * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  501  			 * to this formula for  overall bw consumed by slices.
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  502  			 */
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  503  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  504  		}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  505  	}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  506  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  507  	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  508  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  509  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  510  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  511  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  512  		if (ret)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  513  			return ret;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  514  	}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  515  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  516  	return 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  517  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 40683 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
@ 2020-06-01 14:01   ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2020-06-01 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8444 bytes --]

Hi Stanislav,

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stanislav-Lisovskiy/drm-i915-Fix-wrong-CDCLK-adjustment-changes/20200526-180642
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
config: i386-randconfig-m021-20200531 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c:453 skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk() error: uninitialized symbol 'pipe'.

# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git remote update linux-review
git checkout 21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
vim +/pipe +453 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c

366b6200f76e0f Jani Nikula         2019-08-06  430  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  431  int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  432  {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  433  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  434  	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  435  	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  436  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  437  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  438  	int max_bw = 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  439  	int slice_id;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  440  	enum pipe pipe;
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  441  	int i;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  442  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  443  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  444  		enum plane_id plane_id;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  445  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  446  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  447  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  448  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  449  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  450  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  451  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  452  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26 @453  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
                                                                                                 ^^^^
Not initialized.  Probably "i" was intended?

cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  454  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  455  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  456  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  457  		for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  458  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  459  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  460  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *uv_plane_alloc =
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  461  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  462  			unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  463  			unsigned int dbuf_mask = 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  464  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  465  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, plane_alloc);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  466  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, uv_plane_alloc);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  467  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  468  			/*
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  469  			 * FIXME: To calculate that more properly we probably
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  470  			 * need to to split per plane data_rate into data_rate_y
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  471  			 * and data_rate_uv for multiplanar formats in order not
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  472  			 * to get accounted those twice if they happen to reside
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  473  			 * on different slices.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  474  			 * However for pre-icl this would work anyway because
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  475  			 * we have only single slice and for icl+ uv plane has
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  476  			 * non-zero data rate.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  477  			 * So in worst case those calculation are a bit
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  478  			 * pessimistic, which shouldn't pose any significant
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  479  			 * problem anyway.
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  480  			 */
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  481  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  482  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  483  		}
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  484  	}
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  485  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  486  	if (!old_bw_state)
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  487  		return 0;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  488  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  489  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  490  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  491  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  492  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  493  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  494  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  495  			/*
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  496  			 * Current experimental observations show that contrary
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  497  			 * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  498  			 * for slices in total.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  499  			 * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  500  			 * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  501  			 * to this formula for  overall bw consumed by slices.
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  502  			 */
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  503  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  504  		}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  505  	}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  506  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  507  	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  508  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  509  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  510  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  511  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  512  		if (ret)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  513  			return ret;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  514  	}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  515  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  516  	return 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  517  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 40683 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
@ 2020-06-01 14:01   ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2020-06-01 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8444 bytes --]

Hi Stanislav,

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stanislav-Lisovskiy/drm-i915-Fix-wrong-CDCLK-adjustment-changes/20200526-180642
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
config: i386-randconfig-m021-20200531 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c:453 skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk() error: uninitialized symbol 'pipe'.

# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git remote update linux-review
git checkout 21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
vim +/pipe +453 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c

366b6200f76e0f Jani Nikula         2019-08-06  430  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  431  int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  432  {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  433  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  434  	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  435  	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  436  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  437  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  438  	int max_bw = 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  439  	int slice_id;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  440  	enum pipe pipe;
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  441  	int i;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  442  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  443  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  444  		enum plane_id plane_id;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  445  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  446  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  447  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  448  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  449  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  450  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  451  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  452  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26 @453  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
                                                                                                 ^^^^
Not initialized.  Probably "i" was intended?

cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  454  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  455  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  456  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  457  		for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  458  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  459  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  460  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *uv_plane_alloc =
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  461  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  462  			unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  463  			unsigned int dbuf_mask = 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  464  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  465  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, plane_alloc);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  466  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, uv_plane_alloc);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  467  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  468  			/*
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  469  			 * FIXME: To calculate that more properly we probably
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  470  			 * need to to split per plane data_rate into data_rate_y
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  471  			 * and data_rate_uv for multiplanar formats in order not
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  472  			 * to get accounted those twice if they happen to reside
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  473  			 * on different slices.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  474  			 * However for pre-icl this would work anyway because
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  475  			 * we have only single slice and for icl+ uv plane has
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  476  			 * non-zero data rate.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  477  			 * So in worst case those calculation are a bit
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  478  			 * pessimistic, which shouldn't pose any significant
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  479  			 * problem anyway.
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  480  			 */
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  481  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  482  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  483  		}
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  484  	}
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  485  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  486  	if (!old_bw_state)
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  487  		return 0;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  488  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  489  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  490  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  491  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  492  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  493  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  494  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  495  			/*
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  496  			 * Current experimental observations show that contrary
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  497  			 * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  498  			 * for slices in total.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  499  			 * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  500  			 * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  501  			 * to this formula for  overall bw consumed by slices.
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  502  			 */
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  503  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  504  		}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  505  	}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  506  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  507  	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  508  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  509  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  510  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  511  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  512  		if (ret)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  513  			return ret;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  514  	}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  515  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  516  	return 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  517  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 40683 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
  2020-06-01 14:01   ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2020-06-01 14:12     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav @ 2020-06-01 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: kbuild, chris, kbuild-all, intel-gfx

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 05:01:08PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Stanislav,
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stanislav-Lisovskiy/drm-i915-Fix-wrong-CDCLK-adjustment-changes/20200526-180642
> base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
> config: i386-randconfig-m021-20200531 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c:453 skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk() error: uninitialized symbol 'pipe'.
> 
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git remote update linux-review
> git checkout 21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
> vim +/pipe +453 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> 
> 366b6200f76e0f Jani Nikula         2019-08-06  430  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  431  int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  432  {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  433  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  434  	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  435  	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  436  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  437  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  438  	int max_bw = 0;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  439  	int slice_id;
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  440  	enum pipe pipe;
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  441  	int i;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  442  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  443  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  444  		enum plane_id plane_id;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  445  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  446  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  447  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  448  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  449  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  450  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  451  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  452  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26 @453  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
>                                                                                                  ^^^^
> Not initialized.  Probably "i" was intended?

Ahh.. Rather silly typo - it should be crtc->pipe.
Thanks for spotting.

Stan

> 
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  454  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  455  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  456  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  457  		for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  458  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  459  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  460  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *uv_plane_alloc =
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  461  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  462  			unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  463  			unsigned int dbuf_mask = 0;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  464  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  465  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, plane_alloc);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  466  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, uv_plane_alloc);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  467  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  468  			/*
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  469  			 * FIXME: To calculate that more properly we probably
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  470  			 * need to to split per plane data_rate into data_rate_y
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  471  			 * and data_rate_uv for multiplanar formats in order not
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  472  			 * to get accounted those twice if they happen to reside
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  473  			 * on different slices.
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  474  			 * However for pre-icl this would work anyway because
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  475  			 * we have only single slice and for icl+ uv plane has
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  476  			 * non-zero data rate.
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  477  			 * So in worst case those calculation are a bit
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  478  			 * pessimistic, which shouldn't pose any significant
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  479  			 * problem anyway.
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  480  			 */
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  481  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  482  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  483  		}
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  484  	}
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  485  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  486  	if (!old_bw_state)
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  487  		return 0;
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  488  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  489  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  490  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  491  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  492  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  493  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  494  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  495  			/*
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  496  			 * Current experimental observations show that contrary
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  497  			 * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  498  			 * for slices in total.
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  499  			 * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  500  			 * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  501  			 * to this formula for  overall bw consumed by slices.
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  502  			 */
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  503  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  504  		}
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  505  	}
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  506  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  507  	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  508  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  509  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  510  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  511  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  512  		if (ret)
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  513  			return ret;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  514  	}
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  515  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  516  	return 0;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  517  }
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
@ 2020-06-01 14:12     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav @ 2020-06-01 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8826 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 05:01:08PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Stanislav,
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stanislav-Lisovskiy/drm-i915-Fix-wrong-CDCLK-adjustment-changes/20200526-180642
> base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
> config: i386-randconfig-m021-20200531 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c:453 skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk() error: uninitialized symbol 'pipe'.
> 
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git remote update linux-review
> git checkout 21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
> vim +/pipe +453 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> 
> 366b6200f76e0f Jani Nikula         2019-08-06  430  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  431  int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  432  {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  433  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  434  	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  435  	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  436  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  437  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  438  	int max_bw = 0;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  439  	int slice_id;
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  440  	enum pipe pipe;
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  441  	int i;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  442  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  443  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  444  		enum plane_id plane_id;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  445  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  446  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  447  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  448  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  449  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  450  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  451  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  452  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26 @453  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
>                                                                                                  ^^^^
> Not initialized.  Probably "i" was intended?

Ahh.. Rather silly typo - it should be crtc->pipe.
Thanks for spotting.

Stan

> 
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  454  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  455  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  456  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  457  		for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  458  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  459  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  460  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *uv_plane_alloc =
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  461  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  462  			unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  463  			unsigned int dbuf_mask = 0;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  464  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  465  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, plane_alloc);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  466  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, uv_plane_alloc);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  467  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  468  			/*
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  469  			 * FIXME: To calculate that more properly we probably
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  470  			 * need to to split per plane data_rate into data_rate_y
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  471  			 * and data_rate_uv for multiplanar formats in order not
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  472  			 * to get accounted those twice if they happen to reside
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  473  			 * on different slices.
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  474  			 * However for pre-icl this would work anyway because
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  475  			 * we have only single slice and for icl+ uv plane has
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  476  			 * non-zero data rate.
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  477  			 * So in worst case those calculation are a bit
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  478  			 * pessimistic, which shouldn't pose any significant
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  479  			 * problem anyway.
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  480  			 */
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  481  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  482  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  483  		}
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  484  	}
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  485  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  486  	if (!old_bw_state)
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  487  		return 0;
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  488  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  489  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  490  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  491  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  492  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  493  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  494  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  495  			/*
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  496  			 * Current experimental observations show that contrary
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  497  			 * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  498  			 * for slices in total.
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  499  			 * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  500  			 * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
> cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  501  			 * to this formula for  overall bw consumed by slices.
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  502  			 */
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  503  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  504  		}
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  505  	}
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  506  
> 21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  507  	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  508  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  509  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  510  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  511  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  512  		if (ret)
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  513  			return ret;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  514  	}
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  515  
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  516  	return 0;
> cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  517  }
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
  2020-06-01  7:49   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
@ 2020-06-01 20:37     ` Manasi Navare
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2020-06-01 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav; +Cc: intel-gfx, chris

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:49:54AM +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:57:38PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:48:52PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > Previous patch didn't take into account all pipes
> > > but only those in state, which could cause wrong
> > > CDCLK conclcusions and calculations.
> > > Also there was a severe issue with min_cdclk being
> > > assigned to 0 every compare cycle.
> > > 
> > > Too bad this was found by me only after merge.
> > > This could be also causing the issues in test, however
> > > not clear - anyway marking this as fixing the
> > > "Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs".
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> > > Fixes: cd1915460861 ("Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs")
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c      | 51 ++++++++++++--------
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c   | 19 +++++---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 26 +++++-----
> > >  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > > index a79bd7aeb03b..8096138abecc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > > @@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > >  	int max_bw = 0;
> > >  	int slice_id;
> > > +	enum pipe pipe;
> > >  	int i;
> > >  
> > >  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > > @@ -447,7 +448,9 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > >  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> > >  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
> > >  
> > > -		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> > > +		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> > > +
> > > +		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> > >  
> > >  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
> > >  
> > > @@ -478,6 +481,15 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > >  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
> > >  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
> > >  		}
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (!old_bw_state)
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > > +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > > +		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
> > > +
> > 
> > So the condition !old_bw_state() will make sure we loop through
> > only the active pipes and compute crtc_bw only for those right?
> > 
> > Manasi
> 
> Well, in fact this condition just checks if we had any crtcs in state - 
> otherwise there were no changes, so bw_state global object doesn't need
> to be changed. Whenever something happens to crtc we should have it
> in the state, so this condition just checks if we need to modify bw_state
> or not. 
> 
> Regarding active/inactive pipes - currently for inactive pipes,
> we are going to get 0 dbuf slice mask, so we just won't accumulate any data
> rate for those. So if the pipe got disabled we will get less required min_cdclk
> which against old_bw_state, which will mean that we are going to acquire
> the global state lock for writing.
> 
> In fact we could optimize the code by skipping inactive pipes completely 
> i.e don't even calculate dbuf slice mask,
> which will be 0. However the logic and the end result would be
> the same anyway.

Okay yes this makes sense, thanks for the clarification.
So would be it be an easy change to add a condition to return for an inactive pipe?

Manasi

> 
> Stan
> 
> > 
> > > +		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> > >  
> > >  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
> > >  			/*
> > > @@ -490,14 +502,9 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > >  			 */
> > >  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
> > >  		}
> > > -
> > > -		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
> > > -
> > > -		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	if (!old_bw_state)
> > > -		return 0;
> > > +	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
> > >  
> > >  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
> > >  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> > > @@ -511,34 +518,38 @@ int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > >  
> > >  int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > >  {
> > > -	int i;
> > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> > > +	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> > > +	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> > >  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > >  	int min_cdclk = 0;
> > > -	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> > > -	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> > > +	enum pipe pipe;
> > > +	int i;
> > >  
> > >  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > > -		struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
> > > -
> > >  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> > >  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> > >  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
> > >  
> > > -		cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_cdclk_state(state);
> > > -		if (IS_ERR(cdclk_state))
> > > -			return PTR_ERR(cdclk_state);
> > > -
> > > -		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> > > -
> > > -		new_bw_state->min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
> > > -
> > >  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	if (!old_bw_state)
> > >  		return 0;
> > >  
> > > +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > > +		struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
> > > +
> > > +		cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
> > > +		if (!cdclk_state)
> > > +			return 0;
> > > +
> > > +		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
> > > +
> > >  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
> > >  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > index f9b0fc7317de..08468b121d02 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > @@ -2084,9 +2084,12 @@ int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > >  static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct intel_atomic_state *state = cdclk_state->base.state;
> > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> > > +	struct intel_bw_state *bw_state = NULL;
> > >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > >  	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > >  	int min_cdclk, i;
> > > +	enum pipe pipe;
> > >  
> > >  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > >  		int ret;
> > > @@ -2095,6 +2098,10 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> > >  		if (min_cdclk < 0)
> > >  			return min_cdclk;
> > >  
> > > +		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> > > +		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> > > +			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> > > +
> > >  		if (cdclk_state->min_cdclk[i] == min_cdclk)
> > >  			continue;
> > >  
> > > @@ -2106,15 +2113,11 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	min_cdclk = cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk;
> > > +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > > +		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
> > >  
> > > -	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > > -		struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> > > -
> > > -		min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> > > -
> > > -		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> > > -		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> > > -			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> > > +		if (!bw_state)
> > > +			continue;
> > >  
> > >  		min_cdclk = max(bw_state->min_cdclk, min_cdclk);
> > >  	}
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > index f40b909952cc..66af8f3053ed 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -14708,13 +14708,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > >  				    bool *need_cdclk_calc)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> > > -	int i;
> > > +	struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
> > >  	struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
> > > +	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
> > >  	struct intel_plane *plane;
> > > +	int min_cdclk = 0;
> > > +	enum pipe pipe;
> > >  	int ret;
> > > -	struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
> > > -	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > > -	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > > +	int i;
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * active_planes bitmask has been updated, and potentially
> > >  	 * affected planes are part of the state. We can now
> > > @@ -14735,23 +14736,18 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > >  	if (ret)
> > >  		return ret;
> > >  
> > > -	if (!new_cdclk_state)
> > > -		return 0;
> > > -
> > > -	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
> > > -		struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> > > -		int min_cdclk = 0;
> > > +	new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
> > >  
> > > -		min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe], min_cdclk);
> > > +	if (!new_cdclk_state || !new_bw_state)
> > > +		return 0;
> > >  
> > > -		bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> > > -		if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> > > -			return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> > > +	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > > +		min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
> > >  
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * Currently do this change only if we need to increase
> > >  		 */
> > > -		if (bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
> > > +		if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
> > >  			*need_cdclk_calc = true;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
> > > 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes
@ 2020-05-31 23:41 kbuild test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-05-31 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9183 bytes --]

CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
In-Reply-To: <20200526094852.6967-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
References: <20200526094852.6967-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
TO: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
TO: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org
CC: chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk

Hi Stanislav,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[also build test WARNING on drm-intel/drm-intel-next-queued]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next v5.7-rc7 next-20200529]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stanislav-Lisovskiy/drm-i915-Fix-wrong-CDCLK-adjustment-changes/20200526-180642
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
:::::: branch date: 6 days ago
:::::: commit date: 6 days ago
config: i386-randconfig-m021-20200531 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c:453 skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk() error: uninitialized symbol 'pipe'.

# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git remote update linux-review
git checkout 21b0324886122a396687d977d67eb6ce3caf2b17
vim +/pipe +453 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c

366b6200f76e0f Jani Nikula         2019-08-06  430  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  431  int skl_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  432  {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  433  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  434  	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  435  	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  436  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  437  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  438  	int max_bw = 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  439  	int slice_id;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  440  	enum pipe pipe;
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  441  	int i;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  442  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  443  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  444  		enum plane_id plane_id;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  445  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  446  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  447  		new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  448  		if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  449  			return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  450  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  451  		old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  452  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26 @453  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  454  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  455  		memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  456  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  457  		for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  458  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *plane_alloc =
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  459  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  460  			const struct skl_ddb_entry *uv_plane_alloc =
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  461  				&crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  462  			unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  463  			unsigned int dbuf_mask = 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  464  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  465  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, plane_alloc);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  466  			dbuf_mask |= skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(dev_priv, uv_plane_alloc);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  467  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  468  			/*
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  469  			 * FIXME: To calculate that more properly we probably
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  470  			 * need to to split per plane data_rate into data_rate_y
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  471  			 * and data_rate_uv for multiplanar formats in order not
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  472  			 * to get accounted those twice if they happen to reside
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  473  			 * on different slices.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  474  			 * However for pre-icl this would work anyway because
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  475  			 * we have only single slice and for icl+ uv plane has
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  476  			 * non-zero data rate.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  477  			 * So in worst case those calculation are a bit
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  478  			 * pessimistic, which shouldn't pose any significant
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  479  			 * problem anyway.
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  480  			 */
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  481  			for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(slice_id, dbuf_mask)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  482  				crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id] += data_rate;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  483  		}
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  484  	}
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  485  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  486  	if (!old_bw_state)
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  487  		return 0;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  488  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  489  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  490  		struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  491  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  492  		crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  493  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  494  		for_each_dbuf_slice(slice_id) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  495  			/*
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  496  			 * Current experimental observations show that contrary
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  497  			 * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  498  			 * for slices in total.
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  499  			 * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  500  			 * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
cac91e671ad5dc Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-22  501  			 * to this formula for  overall bw consumed by slices.
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  502  			 */
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  503  			max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice_id];
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  504  		}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  505  	}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  506  
21b0324886122a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-26  507  	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  508  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  509  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  510  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  511  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  512  		if (ret)
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  513  			return ret;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  514  	}
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  515  
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  516  	return 0;
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  517  }
cd19154608610a Stanislav Lisovskiy 2020-05-20  518  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 40683 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-01 20:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-26  9:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Fix wrong CDCLK adjustment changes Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-05-26 10:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-05-26 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-05-29 23:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] " Manasi Navare
2020-06-01  7:49   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-06-01 20:37     ` Manasi Navare
2020-05-31 20:03 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-31 20:03   ` kbuild test robot
2020-06-01 14:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-06-01 14:01   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-06-01 14:01   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-06-01 14:12   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-06-01 14:12     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-05-31 23:41 kbuild test robot

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.