From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: fix a hyperv W^X violation and remove vmalloc_exec Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:43:04 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200618064307.32739-1-hch@lst.de> (raw) Hi all, Dexuan reported a W^X violation due to the fact that the hyper hypercall page due switching it to be allocated using vmalloc_exec. The problem is that PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC as used by vmalloc_exec actually sets writable permissions in the pte. This series fixes the issue by switching to the low-level __vmalloc_node_range interface that allows specifing more detailed permissions instead. It then also open codes the other two callers and removes the somewhat confusing vmalloc_exec interface. Peter noted that the hyper hypercall page allocation also has another long standing issue in that it shouldn't use the full vmalloc but just the module space. This issue is so far theoretical as the allocation is done early in the boot process. I plan to fix it with another bigger series for 5.9.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, x86@kernel.org, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: fix a hyperv W^X violation and remove vmalloc_exec Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:43:04 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200618064307.32739-1-hch@lst.de> (raw) Hi all, Dexuan reported a W^X violation due to the fact that the hyper hypercall page due switching it to be allocated using vmalloc_exec. The problem is that PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC as used by vmalloc_exec actually sets writable permissions in the pte. This series fixes the issue by switching to the low-level __vmalloc_node_range interface that allows specifing more detailed permissions instead. It then also open codes the other two callers and removes the somewhat confusing vmalloc_exec interface. Peter noted that the hyper hypercall page allocation also has another long standing issue in that it shouldn't use the full vmalloc but just the module space. This issue is so far theoretical as the allocation is done early in the boot process. I plan to fix it with another bigger series for 5.9. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 6:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-06-18 6:43 Christoph Hellwig [this message] 2020-06-18 6:43 ` fix a hyperv W^X violation and remove vmalloc_exec Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 6:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/hyperv: allocate the hypercall page with only read and execute bits Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 11:47 ` Wei Liu 2020-06-18 11:47 ` Wei Liu 2020-06-18 6:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: use PAGE_KERNEL_ROX directly in alloc_insn_page Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand 2020-06-18 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand 2020-06-18 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-06-18 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-06-18 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-06-18 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-06-21 2:16 ` Andrew Morton 2020-06-23 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-23 9:07 ` Will Deacon 2020-06-23 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-06-23 9:57 ` Will Deacon 2020-06-27 7:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2020-06-27 7:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2020-06-27 7:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2020-06-27 7:56 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-27 7:56 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-27 7:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2020-06-27 7:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2020-06-27 7:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2020-06-18 6:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: remove vmalloc_exec Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-18 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand 2020-06-18 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand 2020-06-18 9:28 ` fix a hyperv W^X violation and " Peter Zijlstra 2020-06-18 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200618064307.32739-1-hch@lst.de \ --to=hch@lst.de \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=decui@microsoft.com \ --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.