[PATCH 0/4] Fix a bunch of W=1 warnings in PWM

[PATCH 0/4] Fix a bunch of W=1 warnings in PWM

[Lee Jones]

Attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently
overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings.

Lee Jones (4):
  pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty
    cycle
  pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle
  pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg
  pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc
    header

 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c    | 3 +--
 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c     | 1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH 0/4] Fix a bunch of W=1 warnings in PWM

[Lee Jones]

Attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently
overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings.

Lee Jones (4):
  pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty
    cycle
  pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle
  pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg
  pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc
    header

 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c    | 3 +--
 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c     | 1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Lee Jones]

'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
evaluate to false.

Fixes the following W=1 warning:

 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]

Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
index 1f829edd8ee70..46f0a45e9049c 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
@@ -143,8 +143,7 @@ static int iproc_pwmc_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		value = rate * state->duty_cycle;
 		duty = div64_u64(value, div);
 
-		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN ||
-		    duty < IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN)
+		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		if (period <= IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MAX &&
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Lee Jones]

'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
evaluate to false.

Fixes the following W=1 warning:

 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]

Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
index 1f829edd8ee70..46f0a45e9049c 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
@@ -143,8 +143,7 @@ static int iproc_pwmc_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		value = rate * state->duty_cycle;
 		duty = div64_u64(value, div);
 
-		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN ||
-		    duty < IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN)
+		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		if (period <= IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MAX &&
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Lee Jones]

'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
evaluate to false.

Fixes the following W=1 warning:

 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]

Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
index 1f829edd8ee70..46f0a45e9049c 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
@@ -143,8 +143,7 @@ static int iproc_pwmc_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		value = rate * state->duty_cycle;
 		duty = div64_u64(value, div);
 
-		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN ||
-		    duty < IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN)
+		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		if (period <= IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MAX &&
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

And IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN is unused after remove this single use of
the define, if you also remove it you can add:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

And IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN is unused after remove this single use of
the define, if you also remove it you can add:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

And IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN is unused after remove this single use of
the define, if you also remove it you can add:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Scott Branden]

On 2020-06-29 9:45 a.m., Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
>> evaluate to false.
>>
>> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
>>
>>   drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
>>
>> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
>> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> And IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN is unused after remove this single use of
> the define, if you also remove it you can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
We actually made this same change internally recently but hadn't 
upstreamed it yet.

Tested-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Scott Branden]

On 2020-06-29 9:45 a.m., Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
>> evaluate to false.
>>
>> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
>>
>>   drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
>>
>> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
>> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> And IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN is unused after remove this single use of
> the define, if you also remove it you can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
We actually made this same change internally recently but hadn't 
upstreamed it yet.

Tested-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Scott Branden]

On 2020-06-29 9:45 a.m., Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
>> evaluate to false.
>>
>> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
>>
>>   drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
>>
>> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
>> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> And IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN is unused after remove this single use of
> the define, if you also remove it you can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
We actually made this same change internally recently but hadn't 
upstreamed it yet.

Tested-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1509 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:49PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> index 1f829edd8ee70..46f0a45e9049c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> @@ -143,8 +143,7 @@ static int iproc_pwmc_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  		value = rate * state->duty_cycle;
>  		duty = div64_u64(value, div);
>  
> -		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN ||
> -		    duty < IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN)
> +		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
>  		if (period <= IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MAX &&

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1509 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:49PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> index 1f829edd8ee70..46f0a45e9049c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> @@ -143,8 +143,7 @@ static int iproc_pwmc_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  		value = rate * state->duty_cycle;
>  		duty = div64_u64(value, div);
>  
> -		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN ||
> -		    duty < IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN)
> +		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
>  		if (period <= IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MAX &&

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1509 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:49PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> index 1f829edd8ee70..46f0a45e9049c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
> @@ -143,8 +143,7 @@ static int iproc_pwmc_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  		value = rate * state->duty_cycle;
>  		duty = div64_u64(value, div);
>  
> -		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN ||
> -		    duty < IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN)
> +		if (period < IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MIN)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
>  		if (period <= IPROC_PWM_PERIOD_MAX &&

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[PATCH 2/4] pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Lee Jones]

'dc' here is an unsigned long, thus checking for <0 will always
evaluate to false.

Fixes the following W=1 warning:

 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c:141:35: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]

Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c
index 81da91df2529a..16c5898b934a8 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		dc = div64_u64(val, div);
 
 		/* If duty_ns or period_ns are not achievable then return */
-		if (pc < PERIOD_COUNT_MIN || dc < DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN)
+		if (pc < PERIOD_COUNT_MIN)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		/* If pc and dc are in bounds, the calculation is done */
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH 2/4] pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Lee Jones]

'dc' here is an unsigned long, thus checking for <0 will always
evaluate to false.

Fixes the following W=1 warning:

 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c:141:35: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]

Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c
index 81da91df2529a..16c5898b934a8 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		dc = div64_u64(val, div);
 
 		/* If duty_ns or period_ns are not achievable then return */
-		if (pc < PERIOD_COUNT_MIN || dc < DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN)
+		if (pc < PERIOD_COUNT_MIN)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		/* If pc and dc are in bounds, the calculation is done */
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/4] pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'dc' here is an unsigned long, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c:141:35: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

And similar to patch #1, DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN now gets unused, so if you
remove it as well, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 2/4] pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'dc' here is an unsigned long, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c:141:35: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

And similar to patch #1, DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN now gets unused, so if you
remove it as well, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/4] pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1161 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:45:31AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 'dc' here is an unsigned long, thus checking for <0 will always
> > evaluate to false.
> > 
> > Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> > 
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c:141:35: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> > 
> > Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> > Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> > Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> > Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> And similar to patch #1, DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN now gets unused, so if you
> remove it as well, you can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

Even without removing DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN (which might still serve as
documentation):

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 2/4] pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1161 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:45:31AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 'dc' here is an unsigned long, thus checking for <0 will always
> > evaluate to false.
> > 
> > Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> > 
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c:141:35: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> > 
> > Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> > Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> > Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
> > Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> And similar to patch #1, DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN now gets unused, so if you
> remove it as well, you can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

Even without removing DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN (which might still serve as
documentation):

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/4] pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg

[Lee Jones]

Kerneldoc syntax is used, but not complete.

Descriptions are required for all arguments.

Fixes the following W=1 build warning:

 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'soc' not described in 'pwm_mediatek_chip'

Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index b94e0d09c300f..ab001ce55178e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct pwm_mediatek_of_data {
  * @clk_main: the clock used by PWM core
  * @clk_pwms: the clock used by each PWM channel
  * @clk_freq: the fix clock frequency of legacy MIPS SoC
+ * @soc: pointer to chip's platform data
  */
 struct pwm_mediatek_chip {
 	struct pwm_chip chip;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH 3/4] pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg

[Lee Jones]

Kerneldoc syntax is used, but not complete.

Descriptions are required for all arguments.

Fixes the following W=1 build warning:

 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'soc' not described in 'pwm_mediatek_chip'

Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index b94e0d09c300f..ab001ce55178e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct pwm_mediatek_of_data {
  * @clk_main: the clock used by PWM core
  * @clk_pwms: the clock used by each PWM channel
  * @clk_freq: the fix clock frequency of legacy MIPS SoC
+ * @soc: pointer to chip's platform data
  */
 struct pwm_mediatek_chip {
 	struct pwm_chip chip;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/4] pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg

[Lee Jones]

Kerneldoc syntax is used, but not complete.

Descriptions are required for all arguments.

Fixes the following W=1 build warning:

 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'soc' not described in 'pwm_mediatek_chip'

Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index b94e0d09c300f..ab001ce55178e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct pwm_mediatek_of_data {
  * @clk_main: the clock used by PWM core
  * @clk_pwms: the clock used by each PWM channel
  * @clk_freq: the fix clock frequency of legacy MIPS SoC
+ * @soc: pointer to chip's platform data
  */
 struct pwm_mediatek_chip {
 	struct pwm_chip chip;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

Re: [PATCH 3/4] pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1442 bytes --]

Hello Lee,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Kerneldoc syntax is used, but not complete.
> 
> Descriptions are required for all arguments.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 build warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'soc' not described in 'pwm_mediatek_chip'
> 
> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> Cc: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> index b94e0d09c300f..ab001ce55178e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct pwm_mediatek_of_data {
>   * @clk_main: the clock used by PWM core
>   * @clk_pwms: the clock used by each PWM channel
>   * @clk_freq: the fix clock frequency of legacy MIPS SoC
> + * @soc: pointer to chip's platform data
>   */
>  struct pwm_mediatek_chip {
>  	struct pwm_chip chip;

LGTM:

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 3/4] pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1442 bytes --]

Hello Lee,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Kerneldoc syntax is used, but not complete.
> 
> Descriptions are required for all arguments.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 build warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'soc' not described in 'pwm_mediatek_chip'
> 
> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> Cc: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> index b94e0d09c300f..ab001ce55178e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct pwm_mediatek_of_data {
>   * @clk_main: the clock used by PWM core
>   * @clk_pwms: the clock used by each PWM channel
>   * @clk_freq: the fix clock frequency of legacy MIPS SoC
> + * @soc: pointer to chip's platform data
>   */
>  struct pwm_mediatek_chip {
>  	struct pwm_chip chip;

LGTM:

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/4] pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1442 bytes --]

Hello Lee,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Kerneldoc syntax is used, but not complete.
> 
> Descriptions are required for all arguments.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 build warning:
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c:57: warning: Function parameter or member 'soc' not described in 'pwm_mediatek_chip'
> 
> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> Cc: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
> Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> index b94e0d09c300f..ab001ce55178e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct pwm_mediatek_of_data {
>   * @clk_main: the clock used by PWM core
>   * @clk_pwms: the clock used by each PWM channel
>   * @clk_freq: the fix clock frequency of legacy MIPS SoC
> + * @soc: pointer to chip's platform data
>   */
>  struct pwm_mediatek_chip {
>  	struct pwm_chip chip;

LGTM:

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

[PATCH 4/4] pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc header

[Lee Jones]

Argument descriptions must be prepended with a '@' to be understood
by the kerneldoc tooling/parsers/validators.

Fixes the following W=1 warning:

  drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c:70: warning: Function parameter or member 'dm_timer_pdev' not described in 'pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip'

Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Grant Erickson <marathon96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
index 0d31833db2e2c..75cea7f2aff5e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
  * @mutex:		Mutex to protect pwm apply state
  * @dm_timer:		Pointer to omap dm timer.
  * @pdata:		Pointer to omap dm timer ops.
- * dm_timer_pdev:	Pointer to omap dm timer platform device
+ * @dm_timer_pdev:	Pointer to omap dm timer platform device
  */
 struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip {
 	struct pwm_chip chip;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH 4/4] pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc header

[Lee Jones]

Argument descriptions must be prepended with a '@' to be understood
by the kerneldoc tooling/parsers/validators.

Fixes the following W=1 warning:

  drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c:70: warning: Function parameter or member 'dm_timer_pdev' not described in 'pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip'

Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Grant Erickson <marathon96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
index 0d31833db2e2c..75cea7f2aff5e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
  * @mutex:		Mutex to protect pwm apply state
  * @dm_timer:		Pointer to omap dm timer.
  * @pdata:		Pointer to omap dm timer ops.
- * dm_timer_pdev:	Pointer to omap dm timer platform device
+ * @dm_timer_pdev:	Pointer to omap dm timer platform device
  */
 struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip {
 	struct pwm_chip chip;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/4] pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc header

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1588 bytes --]

Hello,

[dropped Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com> from recipents as his
address bounces]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Argument descriptions must be prepended with a '@' to be understood
> by the kerneldoc tooling/parsers/validators.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c:70: warning: Function parameter or member 'dm_timer_pdev' not described in 'pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip'
> 
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Cc: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Cc: Grant Erickson <marathon96@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
> index 0d31833db2e2c..75cea7f2aff5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
>   * @mutex:		Mutex to protect pwm apply state
>   * @dm_timer:		Pointer to omap dm timer.
>   * @pdata:		Pointer to omap dm timer ops.
> - * dm_timer_pdev:	Pointer to omap dm timer platform device
> + * @dm_timer_pdev:	Pointer to omap dm timer platform device
>   */
>  struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip {
>  	struct pwm_chip chip;

LGTM,

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 4/4] pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc header

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1588 bytes --]

Hello,

[dropped Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com> from recipents as his
address bounces]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Argument descriptions must be prepended with a '@' to be understood
> by the kerneldoc tooling/parsers/validators.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> 
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c:70: warning: Function parameter or member 'dm_timer_pdev' not described in 'pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip'
> 
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Cc: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Cc: Grant Erickson <marathon96@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
> index 0d31833db2e2c..75cea7f2aff5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
>   * @mutex:		Mutex to protect pwm apply state
>   * @dm_timer:		Pointer to omap dm timer.
>   * @pdata:		Pointer to omap dm timer ops.
> - * dm_timer_pdev:	Pointer to omap dm timer platform device
> + * @dm_timer_pdev:	Pointer to omap dm timer platform device
>   */
>  struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip {
>  	struct pwm_chip chip;

LGTM,

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix a bunch of W=1 warnings in PWM

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 776 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently
> overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings.
> 
> Lee Jones (4):
>   pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty
>     cycle
>   pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle
>   pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg
>   pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc
>     header
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c    | 3 +--
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c     | 2 +-
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c     | 1 +
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix a bunch of W=1 warnings in PWM

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 776 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently
> overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings.
> 
> Lee Jones (4):
>   pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty
>     cycle
>   pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle
>   pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg
>   pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc
>     header
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c    | 3 +--
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c     | 2 +-
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c     | 1 +
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel