* [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression @ 2020-07-18 13:51 Vinod Koul 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: add missing kernel doc Vinod Koul ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-18 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dmaengine; +Cc: Vinod Koul, Hyun Kwon, Laurent Pinchart, Michal Simek xilinx_dpdma_config() channel id is unsigned int and compares with ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 which is zero, so remove this comparison drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:1073:15: warning: comparison of unsigned expression in ‘>= 0’ is always true [-Wtype-limits] if (chan->id >= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 && chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> --- drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c index af88a6762ef4..8e602378f2dc 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int xilinx_dpdma_config(struct dma_chan *dchan, * Abuse the slave_id to indicate that the channel is part of a video * group. */ - if (chan->id >= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 && chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) + if (chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) chan->video_group = config->slave_id != 0; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->lock, flags); -- 2.26.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: add missing kernel doc 2020-07-18 13:51 [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-18 13:52 ` Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 12:45 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 12:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression Laurent Pinchart 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-18 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dmaengine; +Cc: Vinod Koul, Hyun Kwon, Laurent Pinchart, Michal Simek xilinx_dpdma_sw_desc_set_dma_addrs() documentation is missing describing 'xdev', so add it drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:313: warning: Function parameter or member 'xdev' not described in 'xilinx_dpdma_sw_desc_set_dma_addrs' Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> --- drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c index 8e602378f2dc..430f3714f6a3 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static inline void dpdma_set(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 set) /** * xilinx_dpdma_sw_desc_set_dma_addrs - Set DMA addresses in the descriptor + * @xdev: DPDMA device * @sw_desc: The software descriptor in which to set DMA addresses * @prev: The previous descriptor * @dma_addr: array of dma addresses -- 2.26.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: add missing kernel doc 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: add missing kernel doc Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-22 12:45 ` Laurent Pinchart 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-07-22 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinod Koul; +Cc: dmaengine, Hyun Kwon, Michal Simek Hi Vinod, Thank you for the patch. On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:22:00PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > xilinx_dpdma_sw_desc_set_dma_addrs() documentation is missing describing > 'xdev', so add it > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:313: warning: Function parameter or > member 'xdev' not described in 'xilinx_dpdma_sw_desc_set_dma_addrs' > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > --- > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > index 8e602378f2dc..430f3714f6a3 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static inline void dpdma_set(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 set) > > /** > * xilinx_dpdma_sw_desc_set_dma_addrs - Set DMA addresses in the descriptor > + * @xdev: DPDMA device > * @sw_desc: The software descriptor in which to set DMA addresses > * @prev: The previous descriptor > * @dma_addr: array of dma addresses -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format 2020-07-18 13:51 [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression Vinod Koul 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: add missing kernel doc Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-18 13:52 ` Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 13:11 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-22 12:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression Laurent Pinchart 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-18 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dmaengine; +Cc: Vinod Koul, Hyun Kwon, Laurent Pinchart, Michal Simek xilinx_dpdma_chan structure documents 'desc' members, but that leads to warnings, so split that up and describe members drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:241: warning: Function parameter or member 'desc' not described in 'xilinx_dpdma_chan' Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> --- drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c index 430f3714f6a3..d94c75a842f8 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_tx_desc { * @lock: lock to access struct xilinx_dpdma_chan * @desc_pool: descriptor allocation pool * @err_task: error IRQ bottom half handler - * @desc.pending: Descriptor schedule to the hardware, pending execution - * @desc.active: Descriptor being executed by the hardware + * @desc: pending: Descriptor schedule to the hardware, pending execution + * active: Descriptor being executed by the hardware * @xdev: DPDMA device */ struct xilinx_dpdma_chan { -- 2.26.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-22 13:11 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-22 14:26 ` Vinod Koul 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-07-22 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinod Koul; +Cc: dmaengine, Hyun Kwon, Michal Simek Hi Vinod, Thank you for the patch. On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:22:01PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > xilinx_dpdma_chan structure documents 'desc' members, but that leads > to warnings, so split that up and describe members > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:241: warning: Function parameter or > member 'desc' not described in 'xilinx_dpdma_chan' > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > index 430f3714f6a3..d94c75a842f8 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_tx_desc { > * @lock: lock to access struct xilinx_dpdma_chan > * @desc_pool: descriptor allocation pool > * @err_task: error IRQ bottom half handler > - * @desc.pending: Descriptor schedule to the hardware, pending execution > - * @desc.active: Descriptor being executed by the hardware > + * @desc: pending: Descriptor schedule to the hardware, pending execution > + * active: Descriptor being executed by the hardware According to https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#nested-structs-unions, the existing syntax is supposed to be valid. Where does the above warning come from ? > * @xdev: DPDMA device > */ > struct xilinx_dpdma_chan { -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format 2020-07-22 13:11 ` Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-07-22 14:26 ` Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 14:51 ` Laurent Pinchart 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-22 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: dmaengine, Hyun Kwon, Michal Simek On 22-07-20, 16:11, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:22:01PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > xilinx_dpdma_chan structure documents 'desc' members, but that leads > > to warnings, so split that up and describe members > > > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:241: warning: Function parameter or > > member 'desc' not described in 'xilinx_dpdma_chan' > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > > --- > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > index 430f3714f6a3..d94c75a842f8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_tx_desc { > > * @lock: lock to access struct xilinx_dpdma_chan > > * @desc_pool: descriptor allocation pool > > * @err_task: error IRQ bottom half handler > > - * @desc.pending: Descriptor schedule to the hardware, pending execution > > - * @desc.active: Descriptor being executed by the hardware > > + * @desc: pending: Descriptor schedule to the hardware, pending execution > > + * active: Descriptor being executed by the hardware > > According to > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#nested-structs-unions, > the existing syntax is supposed to be valid. Where does the above > warning come from ? W=1 build again.. > > > * @xdev: DPDMA device > > */ > > struct xilinx_dpdma_chan { > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart -- ~Vinod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format 2020-07-22 14:26 ` Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-22 14:51 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-22 14:54 ` Vinod Koul 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-07-22 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinod Koul; +Cc: dmaengine, Hyun Kwon, Michal Simek Hi Vinod, On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:56:08PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 22-07-20, 16:11, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:22:01PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > xilinx_dpdma_chan structure documents 'desc' members, but that leads > > > to warnings, so split that up and describe members > > > > > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:241: warning: Function parameter or > > > member 'desc' not described in 'xilinx_dpdma_chan' > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > > index 430f3714f6a3..d94c75a842f8 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > > @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_tx_desc { > > > * @lock: lock to access struct xilinx_dpdma_chan > > > * @desc_pool: descriptor allocation pool > > > * @err_task: error IRQ bottom half handler > > > - * @desc.pending: Descriptor schedule to the hardware, pending execution > > > - * @desc.active: Descriptor being executed by the hardware > > > + * @desc: pending: Descriptor schedule to the hardware, pending execution > > > + * active: Descriptor being executed by the hardware > > > > According to > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#nested-structs-unions, > > the existing syntax is supposed to be valid. Where does the above > > warning come from ? > > W=1 build again.. I get the same when plumbing the source file into the kerneldoc build. The generated documentation however contains the description of both desc.pending and desc.active. If you want to fix the warning, I think you should instead add a line to document @desc, but without removing the existing @desc.pending and @desc.active lines. > > > * @xdev: DPDMA device > > > */ > > > struct xilinx_dpdma_chan { -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format 2020-07-22 14:51 ` Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-07-22 14:54 ` Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 16:18 ` Laurent Pinchart 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-22 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: dmaengine, Hyun Kwon, Michal Simek On 22-07-20, 17:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > W=1 build again.. > > I get the same when plumbing the source file into the kerneldoc build. > The generated documentation however contains the description of both > desc.pending and desc.active. If you want to fix the warning, I think > you should instead add a line to document @desc, but without removing > the existing @desc.pending and @desc.active lines. I would like to see clean build with W=1, helps to find other issues :) So do feel free to send the patch to fix this, i will swap them.. -- ~Vinod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format 2020-07-22 14:54 ` Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-22 16:18 ` Laurent Pinchart 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-07-22 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinod Koul; +Cc: dmaengine, Hyun Kwon, Michal Simek On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 08:24:35PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 22-07-20, 17:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > W=1 build again.. > > > > I get the same when plumbing the source file into the kerneldoc build. > > The generated documentation however contains the description of both > > desc.pending and desc.active. If you want to fix the warning, I think > > you should instead add a line to document @desc, but without removing > > the existing @desc.pending and @desc.active lines. > > I would like to see clean build with W=1, helps to find other issues :) > So do feel free to send the patch to fix this, i will swap them.. Done, see "[PATCH] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: Fix kerneldoc warning". -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression 2020-07-18 13:51 [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression Vinod Koul 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: add missing kernel doc Vinod Koul 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-22 12:44 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-22 14:25 ` Vinod Koul 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-07-22 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinod Koul; +Cc: dmaengine, Hyun Kwon, Michal Simek Hi Vinod, Thank you for the patch. On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:21:59PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > xilinx_dpdma_config() channel id is unsigned int and compares with > ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 which is zero, so remove this comparison > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:1073:15: warning: comparison of > unsigned expression in ‘>= 0’ is always true [-Wtype-limits] if > (chan->id >= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 && chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) I didn't see that warning, how do you produce it ? > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > index af88a6762ef4..8e602378f2dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int xilinx_dpdma_config(struct dma_chan *dchan, > * Abuse the slave_id to indicate that the channel is part of a video > * group. > */ > - if (chan->id >= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 && chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) > + if (chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) While this doesn't affect the behaviour, I'm worried about the risk of introducing bugs in the future if the ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 becomes non-zero. On the other hand, that's part of the DT ABI, so it shouldn't change. How about switch (chan->id) { case ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0: case ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO1: case ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2: chan->video_group = config->slave_id != 0; break; } instead ? Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > chan->video_group = config->slave_id != 0; > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->lock, flags); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression 2020-07-22 12:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-07-22 14:25 ` Vinod Koul 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2020-07-22 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: dmaengine, Hyun Kwon, Michal Simek On 22-07-20, 15:44, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:21:59PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > xilinx_dpdma_config() channel id is unsigned int and compares with > > ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 which is zero, so remove this comparison > > > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:1073:15: warning: comparison of > > unsigned expression in ‘>= 0’ is always true [-Wtype-limits] if > > (chan->id >= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 && chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) > > I didn't see that warning, how do you produce it ? I see it with gcc and W=1. > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > > --- > > drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > index af88a6762ef4..8e602378f2dc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c > > @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int xilinx_dpdma_config(struct dma_chan *dchan, > > * Abuse the slave_id to indicate that the channel is part of a video > > * group. > > */ > > - if (chan->id >= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 && chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) > > + if (chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2) > > While this doesn't affect the behaviour, I'm worried about the risk of > introducing bugs in the future if the ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0 becomes > non-zero. On the other hand, that's part of the DT ABI, so it shouldn't > change. How about > > switch (chan->id) { > case ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO0: > case ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO1: > case ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2: > chan->video_group = config->slave_id != 0; > break; > } > > instead ? > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Thanks > > > chan->video_group = config->slave_id != 0; > > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->lock, flags); > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart -- ~Vinod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-22 16:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-07-18 13:51 [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression Vinod Koul 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: add missing kernel doc Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 12:45 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-18 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: fix kernel doc format Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 13:11 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-22 14:26 ` Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 14:51 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-22 14:54 ` Vinod Koul 2020-07-22 16:18 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-22 12:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: xilinx: dpdma: remove comparison of unsigned expression Laurent Pinchart 2020-07-22 14:25 ` Vinod Koul
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.