All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	ludovic.desroches@microchip.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com,
	alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: i2c: add generic properties for GPIO bus recovery
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:39:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724193913.GD1227@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200705211918.GB1055@kunai>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 811 bytes --]

On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > +- pinctrl
> > +	add extra pinctrl to configure SCL/SDA pins to GPIO function for bus
> > +	recovery, call it "gpio" or "recovery" state
> 
> I think we should stick with "gpio" only. That is what at91 and imx have
> in their bindings. pxa uses "recovery" as a pinctrl state name but I
> can't find any further use or documentation of that. PXA is not fully
> converted to the best of my knowledge, so maybe it is no problem for PXA
> to switch to "gpio", too? We should ask Russell King (cced).
> 
> Russell, do you object naming the pinctrl state for bus recovery in
> the pxa i2c driver from "recovery" to "gpio"?

No response, so far. I suggest now to support the "recovery" naming but
mark it as deprecated. Opinions?


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
	kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ludovic.desroches@microchip.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: i2c: add generic properties for GPIO bus recovery
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:39:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724193913.GD1227@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200705211918.GB1055@kunai>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 811 bytes --]

On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > +- pinctrl
> > +	add extra pinctrl to configure SCL/SDA pins to GPIO function for bus
> > +	recovery, call it "gpio" or "recovery" state
> 
> I think we should stick with "gpio" only. That is what at91 and imx have
> in their bindings. pxa uses "recovery" as a pinctrl state name but I
> can't find any further use or documentation of that. PXA is not fully
> converted to the best of my knowledge, so maybe it is no problem for PXA
> to switch to "gpio", too? We should ask Russell King (cced).
> 
> Russell, do you object naming the pinctrl state for bus recovery in
> the pxa i2c driver from "recovery" to "gpio"?

No response, so far. I suggest now to support the "recovery" naming but
mark it as deprecated. Opinions?


[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-24 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 14:19 [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: add generic GPIO bus recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: i2c: add generic properties for " Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19   ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-07-05 21:19   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-05 21:19     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-24 19:39     ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-07-24 19:39       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-24 20:52       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-24 20:52         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-27 10:44         ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-27 10:44           ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-27 10:50           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-27 10:50             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-30  9:00             ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-30  9:00               ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 14:16               ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-08-03 14:16                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-08-03 16:42                 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:42                   ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-15 19:21   ` Rob Herring
2020-07-15 19:21     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: core: add generic I2C GPIO recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19   ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 16:54   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-02 16:54     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 13:27     ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 13:27       ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:49       ` wsa
2020-08-03 16:49         ` wsa
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] i2c: core: treat EPROBE_DEFER when acquiring SCL/SDA GPIOs Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19   ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 17:05   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-02 17:05     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 15:33     ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 15:33       ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:59       ` wsa
2020-08-03 16:59         ` wsa
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] i2c: at91: Move to generic GPIO bus recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19   ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 17:08   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-02 17:08     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 15:42     ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 15:42       ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:59       ` wsa
2020-08-03 16:59         ` wsa
2020-08-26  6:14       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-26  6:14         ` Wolfram Sang
2020-09-04  8:55         ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-09-04  8:55           ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-09-04  9:20           ` Wolfram Sang
2020-09-04  9:20             ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-05 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: add " Wolfram Sang
2020-07-05 21:09   ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200724193913.GD1227@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.