From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] i2c: at91: Move to generic GPIO bus recovery
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:20:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200904092032.GA32080@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15466c95-f1ea-63a4-1429-24d9b7567c1c@microchip.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1147 bytes --]
Hi Codrin,
> The pinmux driver needs to have strict set to false, otherwise the
> switching is not available, not at this time at least. Perhaps there is
> room for improvement here, because the I2C bus is not using the pins
> while we are doing GPIO recovery.
Our driver doesn't use 'strict'. The thing is that I can't describe a
pinctrl state for GPIO. GPIO is the default state until another function
is requested. Back to GPIO currently means freeing the pin again, so it
defaults back to GPIO. We are currently discussing it. Geert (CCed)
isn't very happy of describing the same pins with 'function = "gpio"'
because the Kernel already knows the mapping, just needs to revert it.
Geert, please correct me if I am wrong.
> I am not sure I'll have time the next week to work on what you asked me
> regarding sh_mobile and PXA, but I will look into it the week after that.
> Sorry about my delayed reply, I was on vacation.
Well, no need for sh_mobile, this is my todo item :) About PXA, well, I
am still happy that you volunteered to do it, so I hope you had a
relaxing vacation!
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] i2c: at91: Move to generic GPIO bus recovery
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:20:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200904092032.GA32080@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15466c95-f1ea-63a4-1429-24d9b7567c1c@microchip.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1147 bytes --]
Hi Codrin,
> The pinmux driver needs to have strict set to false, otherwise the
> switching is not available, not at this time at least. Perhaps there is
> room for improvement here, because the I2C bus is not using the pins
> while we are doing GPIO recovery.
Our driver doesn't use 'strict'. The thing is that I can't describe a
pinctrl state for GPIO. GPIO is the default state until another function
is requested. Back to GPIO currently means freeing the pin again, so it
defaults back to GPIO. We are currently discussing it. Geert (CCed)
isn't very happy of describing the same pins with 'function = "gpio"'
because the Kernel already knows the mapping, just needs to revert it.
Geert, please correct me if I am wrong.
> I am not sure I'll have time the next week to work on what you asked me
> regarding sh_mobile and PXA, but I will look into it the week after that.
> Sorry about my delayed reply, I was on vacation.
Well, no need for sh_mobile, this is my todo item :) About PXA, well, I
am still happy that you volunteered to do it, so I hope you had a
relaxing vacation!
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 14:19 [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: add generic GPIO bus recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: i2c: add generic properties for " Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-07-05 21:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-05 21:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-24 19:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-24 19:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-24 20:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-24 20:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-27 10:44 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-27 10:44 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-27 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-27 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-30 9:00 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-30 9:00 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 14:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-08-03 14:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-08-03 16:42 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:42 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-15 19:21 ` Rob Herring
2020-07-15 19:21 ` Rob Herring
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: core: add generic I2C GPIO recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 16:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-02 16:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 13:27 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 13:27 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:49 ` wsa
2020-08-03 16:49 ` wsa
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] i2c: core: treat EPROBE_DEFER when acquiring SCL/SDA GPIOs Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-02 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 15:33 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 15:33 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:59 ` wsa
2020-08-03 16:59 ` wsa
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] i2c: at91: Move to generic GPIO bus recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 17:08 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-02 17:08 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 15:42 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 15:42 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:59 ` wsa
2020-08-03 16:59 ` wsa
2020-08-26 6:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-26 6:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-09-04 8:55 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-09-04 8:55 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-09-04 9:20 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-09-04 9:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-05 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: add " Wolfram Sang
2020-07-05 21:09 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200904092032.GA32080@ninjato \
--to=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com \
--cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.