All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 18/22] drm/i915/dg1: enable PORT C/D aka D/E
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:39:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724213918.27424-19-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724213918.27424-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

For DG1 we have a little of mix up wrt to DDI/port names and indexes.
Bspec refers to the ports as DDIA, DDIB, DDI USBC1 and DDI USBC2
(besides the DDIA, DDIB, DDIC, DDID), but the previous naming is the
most unambiguous one. This means that for any register on Display Engine
we should use the index of A, B, D and E. However in some places this is
not true:

- VBT: uses C and D and have to be mapped to D/E

- IO/Combo: uses C and D, but we already differentiate those when
  we created the phy vs port distinction.

Ths additional mapping for VBT and phy are already covered in previous
patches, so now we can initialize the DDI as D/E.

Cc: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index b8870bc3814d..73a530a66af5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -7231,10 +7231,7 @@ bool intel_phy_is_combo(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
 {
 	if (phy == PHY_NONE)
 		return false;
-	else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv))
-		/* FIXME: Enable only two ports for now */
-		return phy <= PHY_B;
-	else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv))
+	else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv) || IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv))
 		return phy <= PHY_D;
 	else if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv))
 		return phy <= PHY_C;
@@ -7258,7 +7255,7 @@ bool intel_phy_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
 
 enum phy intel_port_to_phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
 {
-	if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) && port >= PORT_D)
+	if ((IS_DG1(i915) || IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915)) && port >= PORT_D)
 		return (enum phy)port - 1;
 	else if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(i915) && port == PORT_D)
 		return PHY_A;
@@ -16879,9 +16876,18 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		return;
 
 	if (IS_DG1(dev_priv)) {
-		/* FIXME: Enable only two ports for now */
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
+
+		/*
+		 * Bspec lists the ports as A, B, C (USBC1) and D (USBC2).
+		 * However from the Display Engine perspective all registers are
+		 * actually wired to handle C and D as offsets of D/E. Instead
+		 * of fighting all our macros for handling them specially for
+		 * DG1, just call them D/E
+		 */
+		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
+		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
 	} else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-24 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-24 21:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 00/22] Introduce DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 01/22] drm/i915/dg1: Initialize RAWCLK properly Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 16:35   ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-24 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 02/22] drm/i915/dg1: Define MOCS table for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 19:38   ` Matt Roper
2020-07-24 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 03/22] drm/i915/dg1: Add DG1 power wells Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 20:51   ` Matt Roper
2020-08-13  7:59     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 04/22] drm/i915/dg1: Increase mmio size to 4MB Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 21:48   ` Matt Roper
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/22] drm/i915/dg1: Wait for pcode/uncore handshake at startup Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:24   ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-24 19:24     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-24 19:29       ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 06/22] drm/i915/dg1: Add DPLL macros for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 21:54   ` Matt Roper
2020-08-13  8:07     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 07/22] drm/i915/dg1: Add and setup DPLLs " Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-28 22:14   ` Matt Roper
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 08/22] drm/i915/dg1: Enable DPLL " Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 09/22] drm/i915/dg1: add hpd interrupt handling Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 10/22] drm/i915/dg1: invert HPD pins Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 11/22] drm/i915/dg1: gmbus pin mapping Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 12/22] drm/i915/dg1: Enable first 2 ports for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 13/22] drm/i915/dg1: Don't program PHY_MISC for PHY-C and PHY-D Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 14/22] drm/i915/dg1: Update comp master/slave relationships for PHYs Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 15/22] drm/i915/dg1: Update voltage swing tables for DP Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:48   ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 16/22] drm/i915/dg1: provide port/phy mapping for vbt Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 17/22] drm/i915/dg1: map/unmap pll clocks Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 19/22] drm/i915/dg1: Load DMC Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:27   ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 20/22] drm/i915/dg1: Add initial DG1 workarounds Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 21/22] drm/i915/dg1: DG1 does not support DC6 Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:33   ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-24 21:26     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 22/22] drm/i915/dg1: Change DMC_DEBUG{1, 2} registers Lucas De Marchi
2020-08-03 23:31   ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-07 13:14     ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-07 17:26       ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-10  5:48         ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-13  7:56           ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-24 21:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce DG1 Patchwork
2020-07-24 21:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-24 22:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200724213918.27424-19-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.