All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 11:15 ` Tianjia Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tianjia Zhang @ 2020-08-02 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, airlied, daniel,
	chris, matthew.auld, tvrtko.ursulin, mika.kuoppala, andi.shyti
  Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, tianjia.zhang

In function i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(), not all
paths have the return value set correctly, and in case of memory
allocation failure, a negative error code should be returned.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c            | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 	intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
 	struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
 	struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
-	int err;
+	int err = 0;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref));
 
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 		if (!node) {
 			node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!node) {
-				err = ENOMEM;
+				err = -ENOMEM;
 				goto unwind;
 			}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
index 6014e8dfcbb1..dda801a87b8a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static int __igt_breadcrumbs_smoketest(void *arg)
 		if (!wait) {
 			i915_sw_fence_commit(submit);
 			heap_fence_put(submit);
-			err = ENOMEM;
+			err = -ENOMEM;
 			break;
 		}
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 11:15 ` Tianjia Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tianjia Zhang @ 2020-08-02 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, airlied, daniel,
	chris, matthew.auld, tvrtko.ursulin, mika.kuoppala, andi.shyti
  Cc: tianjia.zhang, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel

In function i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(), not all
paths have the return value set correctly, and in case of memory
allocation failure, a negative error code should be returned.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c            | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 	intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
 	struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
 	struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
-	int err;
+	int err = 0;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref));
 
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 		if (!node) {
 			node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!node) {
-				err = ENOMEM;
+				err = -ENOMEM;
 				goto unwind;
 			}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
index 6014e8dfcbb1..dda801a87b8a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static int __igt_breadcrumbs_smoketest(void *arg)
 		if (!wait) {
 			i915_sw_fence_commit(submit);
 			heap_fence_put(submit);
-			err = ENOMEM;
+			err = -ENOMEM;
 			break;
 		}
 
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 11:15 ` Tianjia Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tianjia Zhang @ 2020-08-02 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, airlied, daniel,
	chris, matthew.auld, tvrtko.ursulin, mika.kuoppala, andi.shyti
  Cc: tianjia.zhang, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel

In function i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(), not all
paths have the return value set correctly, and in case of memory
allocation failure, a negative error code should be returned.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c            | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 	intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
 	struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
 	struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
-	int err;
+	int err = 0;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref));
 
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 		if (!node) {
 			node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!node) {
-				err = ENOMEM;
+				err = -ENOMEM;
 				goto unwind;
 			}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
index 6014e8dfcbb1..dda801a87b8a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static int __igt_breadcrumbs_smoketest(void *arg)
 		if (!wait) {
 			i915_sw_fence_commit(submit);
 			heap_fence_put(submit);
-			err = ENOMEM;
+			err = -ENOMEM;
 			break;
 		}
 
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
  2020-08-02 11:15 ` Tianjia Zhang
  (?)
@ 2020-08-02 11:40   ` Andi Shyti
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-08-02 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tianjia Zhang
  Cc: jani.nikula, joonas.lahtinen, rodrigo.vivi, airlied, daniel,
	chris, matthew.auld, tvrtko.ursulin, mika.kuoppala, intel-gfx,
	dri-devel, linux-kernel, tianjia.zhang

Hi Tianjia,

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
>  	intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
>  	struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
>  	struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> -	int err;
> +	int err = 0;

you don't need the initialization here.

Thanks,
Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 11:40   ` Andi Shyti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-08-02 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tianjia Zhang
  Cc: dri-devel, tvrtko.ursulin, airlied, mika.kuoppala, intel-gfx,
	linux-kernel, chris, tianjia.zhang, matthew.auld, rodrigo.vivi

Hi Tianjia,

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
>  	intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
>  	struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
>  	struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> -	int err;
> +	int err = 0;

you don't need the initialization here.

Thanks,
Andi
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 11:40   ` Andi Shyti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-08-02 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tianjia Zhang
  Cc: dri-devel, airlied, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, chris,
	tianjia.zhang, matthew.auld

Hi Tianjia,

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
>  	intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
>  	struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
>  	struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> -	int err;
> +	int err = 0;

you don't need the initialization here.

Thanks,
Andi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
  2020-08-02 11:40   ` Andi Shyti
  (?)
@ 2020-08-02 11:51     ` Chris Wilson
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-08-02 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Shyti, Tianjia Zhang
  Cc: dri-devel, airlied, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, tianjia.zhang, matthew.auld

Quoting Andi Shyti (2020-08-02 12:40:44)
> Hi Tianjia,
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
> >       intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
> >       struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> >       struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> > -     int err;
> > +     int err = 0;
> 
> you don't need the initialization here.

But it's close enough that I can munge the patch inline.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 11:51     ` Chris Wilson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-08-02 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Shyti, Tianjia Zhang
  Cc: airlied, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, tianjia.zhang, matthew.auld

Quoting Andi Shyti (2020-08-02 12:40:44)
> Hi Tianjia,
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
> >       intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
> >       struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> >       struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> > -     int err;
> > +     int err = 0;
> 
> you don't need the initialization here.

But it's close enough that I can munge the patch inline.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 11:51     ` Chris Wilson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-08-02 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Shyti, Tianjia Zhang
  Cc: airlied, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel, tianjia.zhang, matthew.auld

Quoting Andi Shyti (2020-08-02 12:40:44)
> Hi Tianjia,
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
> >       intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
> >       struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> >       struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> > -     int err;
> > +     int err = 0;
> 
> you don't need the initialization here.

But it's close enough that I can munge the patch inline.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
  2020-08-02 11:51     ` Chris Wilson
  (?)
@ 2020-08-02 13:18       ` Andi Shyti
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-08-02 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson
  Cc: Tianjia Zhang, dri-devel, airlied, intel-gfx, linux-kernel,
	tianjia.zhang, matthew.auld

> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
> > >       intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
> > >       struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> > >       struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> > > -     int err;
> > > +     int err = 0;
> > 
> > you don't need the initialization here.
> 
> But it's close enough that I can munge the patch inline.
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

sure... you can also remove it before merging it and it might
also need:

Fixes: d8af05ff38ae7 ("drm/i915: Allow sharing the idle-barrier from other kernel requests)

but, yeah...

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>

... as well :)

Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 13:18       ` Andi Shyti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-08-02 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson
  Cc: Tianjia Zhang, airlied, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
	tianjia.zhang, matthew.auld

> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
> > >       intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
> > >       struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> > >       struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> > > -     int err;
> > > +     int err = 0;
> > 
> > you don't need the initialization here.
> 
> But it's close enough that I can munge the patch inline.
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

sure... you can also remove it before merging it and it might
also need:

Fixes: d8af05ff38ae7 ("drm/i915: Allow sharing the idle-barrier from other kernel requests)

but, yeah...

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>

... as well :)

Andi
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
@ 2020-08-02 13:18       ` Andi Shyti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-08-02 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson
  Cc: Tianjia Zhang, airlied, intel-gfx, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
	tianjia.zhang, matthew.auld

> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > index d960d0be5bd2..cc017e3cc9c5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
> > >       intel_engine_mask_t tmp, mask = engine->mask;
> > >       struct llist_node *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> > >       struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> > > -     int err;
> > > +     int err = 0;
> > 
> > you don't need the initialization here.
> 
> But it's close enough that I can munge the patch inline.
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

sure... you can also remove it before merging it and it might
also need:

Fixes: d8af05ff38ae7 ("drm/i915: Allow sharing the idle-barrier from other kernel requests)

but, yeah...

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>

... as well :)

Andi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Fix wrong return value (rev2)
  2020-08-02 11:15 ` Tianjia Zhang
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2020-08-03 13:29 ` Patchwork
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-08-03 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Fix wrong return value (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/80175/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Applying: drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
M	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
Auto-merging drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 drm/i915: Fix wrong return value
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-03 13:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-02 11:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Tianjia Zhang
2020-08-02 11:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tianjia Zhang
2020-08-02 11:15 ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-08-02 11:40 ` Andi Shyti
2020-08-02 11:40   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2020-08-02 11:40   ` Andi Shyti
2020-08-02 11:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 11:51     ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 11:51     ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 13:18     ` Andi Shyti
2020-08-02 13:18       ` Andi Shyti
2020-08-02 13:18       ` Andi Shyti
2020-08-03 13:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Fix wrong return value (rev2) Patchwork

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.