All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Bibek Basu <bbasu@nvidia.com>,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: Export __cpu_logical_map
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:19:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810101954.GA9480@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810074956.GB28091@bogus>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:49:56AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 05:46:43PM +0530, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> > > > > > > ERROR: modpost: "__cpu_logical_map" [drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.ko] undefined!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ARM64 tegra194-cpufreq driver use cpu_logical_map, export
> > > > > > > __cpu_logical_map to fix build issue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder why like other instances in the drivers, the mpidr is not get
> > > > > directly from the cpu. The cpufreq_driver->init call happens when the cpu
> > > > > is being brought online and is executed on the required cpu IIUC.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, this occurs during hotplug case.
> > > > But in the case of system boot, 'cpufreq_driver->init' is called later
> > > > during cpufreq platform driver's probe. The value of CPU in 'policy->cpu'
> > > > can be different from the current CPU. That's why read_cpuid_mpidr() can't
> > > > be used.
> > >
> > > Fair enough, why not do cross call like in set_target ? Since it is one-off
> > > in init, I don't see any issue when you are doing it runtime for set_target.
> > >
> > > > > read_cpuid_mpidr() is inline and avoids having to export the logical_cpu_map.
> > > > > Though we may not add physical hotplug anytime soon, less dependency
> > > > > on this cpu_logical_map is better given that we can resolve this without
> > > > > the need to access the map.
> > >
> > > To be honest, we have tried to remove all the dependency on cluster id
> > > in generic code as it is not well defined. This one is tegra specific
> > > driver so should be fine. But I am still bit nervous to export
> > > cpu_logical_map as we have no clue what that would mean for physical
> > > hotplug.
> >
> > As suggested, I have done below change to get the cluster number using
> > read_cpuid_mpidr(). Please review and suggest if this looks ok?
> > I will send formal patch if the change is fine.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
> > index bae527e..06f5ccf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -56,9 +56,11 @@ struct read_counters_work {
> >
> >  static struct workqueue_struct *read_counters_wq;
> >
> > -static enum cluster get_cpu_cluster(u8 cpu)
> > +static void get_cpu_cluster(void *cluster)
> >  {
> > -       return MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(cpu_logical_map(cpu), 1);
> > +       u64 mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> > +
> > +       *((uint32_t *) cluster) = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -186,8 +188,10 @@ static unsigned int tegra194_get_speed(u32 cpu)
> >  static int tegra194_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >  {
> >         struct tegra194_cpufreq_data *data = cpufreq_get_driver_data();
> > -       int cl = get_cpu_cluster(policy->cpu);
> >         u32 cpu;
> > +       u32 cl;
> > +
> > +       smp_call_function_single(policy->cpu, get_cpu_cluster, &cl, true);
> 
> Thanks for this, looks good to me. You can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

I already merged Kefeng's __cpu_logical_map fix (commit eaecca9e7710)
but if the above goes in, I can drop the EXPORT_SYMBOL part (and keep
the rest as it's a good refactoring).

-- 
Catalin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>,
	Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>, Bibek Basu <bbasu@nvidia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: Export __cpu_logical_map
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:19:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810101954.GA9480@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810074956.GB28091@bogus>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:49:56AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 05:46:43PM +0530, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> > > > > > > ERROR: modpost: "__cpu_logical_map" [drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.ko] undefined!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ARM64 tegra194-cpufreq driver use cpu_logical_map, export
> > > > > > > __cpu_logical_map to fix build issue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder why like other instances in the drivers, the mpidr is not get
> > > > > directly from the cpu. The cpufreq_driver->init call happens when the cpu
> > > > > is being brought online and is executed on the required cpu IIUC.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, this occurs during hotplug case.
> > > > But in the case of system boot, 'cpufreq_driver->init' is called later
> > > > during cpufreq platform driver's probe. The value of CPU in 'policy->cpu'
> > > > can be different from the current CPU. That's why read_cpuid_mpidr() can't
> > > > be used.
> > >
> > > Fair enough, why not do cross call like in set_target ? Since it is one-off
> > > in init, I don't see any issue when you are doing it runtime for set_target.
> > >
> > > > > read_cpuid_mpidr() is inline and avoids having to export the logical_cpu_map.
> > > > > Though we may not add physical hotplug anytime soon, less dependency
> > > > > on this cpu_logical_map is better given that we can resolve this without
> > > > > the need to access the map.
> > >
> > > To be honest, we have tried to remove all the dependency on cluster id
> > > in generic code as it is not well defined. This one is tegra specific
> > > driver so should be fine. But I am still bit nervous to export
> > > cpu_logical_map as we have no clue what that would mean for physical
> > > hotplug.
> >
> > As suggested, I have done below change to get the cluster number using
> > read_cpuid_mpidr(). Please review and suggest if this looks ok?
> > I will send formal patch if the change is fine.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
> > index bae527e..06f5ccf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -56,9 +56,11 @@ struct read_counters_work {
> >
> >  static struct workqueue_struct *read_counters_wq;
> >
> > -static enum cluster get_cpu_cluster(u8 cpu)
> > +static void get_cpu_cluster(void *cluster)
> >  {
> > -       return MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(cpu_logical_map(cpu), 1);
> > +       u64 mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> > +
> > +       *((uint32_t *) cluster) = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -186,8 +188,10 @@ static unsigned int tegra194_get_speed(u32 cpu)
> >  static int tegra194_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >  {
> >         struct tegra194_cpufreq_data *data = cpufreq_get_driver_data();
> > -       int cl = get_cpu_cluster(policy->cpu);
> >         u32 cpu;
> > +       u32 cl;
> > +
> > +       smp_call_function_single(policy->cpu, get_cpu_cluster, &cl, true);
> 
> Thanks for this, looks good to me. You can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

I already merged Kefeng's __cpu_logical_map fix (commit eaecca9e7710)
but if the above goes in, I can drop the EXPORT_SYMBOL part (and keep
the rest as it's a good refactoring).

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-10 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200724030433.22287-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
2020-07-24  3:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2020-07-24  3:08   ` Kefeng Wang
2020-07-24  8:16   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-07-24  8:16     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-07-24  9:13     ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-24  9:13       ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-24  9:35       ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-24  9:35         ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-24 10:33         ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-07-24 10:33           ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-07-24  9:16     ` Kefeng Wang
2020-07-24  9:16       ` Kefeng Wang
2020-07-24  9:30     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-24  9:30       ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-24 10:36       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-07-24 10:36         ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-07-24  9:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-24  9:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-24 13:10   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-07-24 13:10     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-07-25  2:00     ` Kefeng Wang
2020-07-25  2:00       ` Kefeng Wang
2020-07-26 11:46     ` Sumit Gupta
2020-07-26 11:46       ` Sumit Gupta
2020-07-27 16:05       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-07-27 16:05         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-08-01 12:16         ` Sumit Gupta
2020-08-01 12:16           ` Sumit Gupta
2020-08-10  7:49           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-08-10  7:49             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-08-10 10:19             ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2020-08-10 10:19               ` Catalin Marinas
2020-08-10 12:11               ` Sudeep Holla
2020-08-10 12:11                 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-08-11 19:44               ` Sumit Gupta
2020-08-11 19:44                 ` Sumit Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200810101954.GA9480@gaia \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=hulkci@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: Export __cpu_logical_map' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.