All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Cc: "Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] xsk: exit NAPI loop when AF_XDP Rx ring is full
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:34:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908113426.7af79b5b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12536115-3dae-1efa-5c0d-34fc951fca48@intel.com>

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:28:14 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
> On 2020-09-08 19:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >> I'll start playing around a bit, but again, I think this simple series
> >> should go in just to make AF_XDP single core usable*today*.  
> > No objection from me.  
> 
> Thanks Jakub, but as you (probably) noticed in the other thread Maxim 
> had some valid concerns. Let's drop this for now, and I'll get back 
> after some experimentation/hacking.

Yeah, I sort of assumed you got the wake-up problem down :S

If it gets complicated it may not be worth pursuing this optimization.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] xsk: exit NAPI loop when AF_XDP Rx ring is full
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:34:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908113426.7af79b5b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12536115-3dae-1efa-5c0d-34fc951fca48@intel.com>

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:28:14 +0200 Bj?rn T?pel wrote:
> On 2020-09-08 19:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >> I'll start playing around a bit, but again, I think this simple series
> >> should go in just to make AF_XDP single core usable*today*.  
> > No objection from me.  
> 
> Thanks Jakub, but as you (probably) noticed in the other thread Maxim 
> had some valid concerns. Let's drop this for now, and I'll get back 
> after some experimentation/hacking.

Yeah, I sort of assumed you got the wake-up problem down :S

If it gets complicated it may not be worth pursuing this optimization.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-08 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-04 13:53 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] xsk: exit NAPI loop when AF_XDP Rx ring is full Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] xsk: improve xdp_do_redirect() error codes Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] xdp: introduce xdp_do_redirect_ext() function Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] xsk: introduce xsk_do_redirect_rx_full() helper Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 15:11   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 15:11     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 15:39     ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 15:39       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-07 12:45       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-07 12:45         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] i40e, xsk: finish napi loop if AF_XDP Rx queue is full Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] ice, " Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] ixgbe, " Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 15:35   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 15:35     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 15:54     ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 15:54       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] xsk: exit NAPI loop when AF_XDP Rx ring " Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:59   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-08 10:32   ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2020-09-08 10:32     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2020-09-08 11:37     ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-09-08 11:37       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Magnus Karlsson
2020-09-08 12:21       ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-08 12:21         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-09 15:37     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-09 15:37       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 14:27 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 14:27   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 14:32   ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 14:32     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-04 23:58     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-04 23:58       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-07 13:37       ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-07 13:37         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-07 18:40         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-07 18:40           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-08  6:58           ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-08  6:58             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-08 17:24             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-08 17:24               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-08 18:28               ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-08 18:28                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2020-09-08 18:34                 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2020-09-08 18:34                   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200908113426.7af79b5b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.