All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: use vmap in shmem_pin_map
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:39:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922143906.GB26664@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922112144.GB32101@casper.infradead.org>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:21:44PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Actually, vfree() will work today; I cc'd you on a documentation update
> to make it clear that this is permitted.

vfree calls __free_pages, the i915 and a lot of other code calls
put_page.  They are mostly the same, but not quite and everytime I
look into that mess I'm more confused than before.

Can someone in the know write sensible documentation on when to use
__free_page(s) vs put_page?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: use vmap in shmem_pin_map
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:39:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922143906.GB26664@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922112144.GB32101@casper.infradead.org>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:21:44PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Actually, vfree() will work today; I cc'd you on a documentation update
> to make it clear that this is permitted.

vfree calls __free_pages, the i915 and a lot of other code calls
put_page.  They are mostly the same, but not quite and everytime I
look into that mess I'm more confused than before.

Can someone in the know write sensible documentation on when to use
__free_page(s) vs put_page?
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 16:37 remove alloc_vm_area Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 17:42   ` Minchan Kim
2020-09-21 17:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Minchan Kim
2020-09-21 17:42     ` Minchan Kim
2020-09-21 18:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 18:17       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 18:42       ` Minchan Kim
2020-09-21 18:42         ` [Intel-gfx] " Minchan Kim
2020-09-21 18:42         ` Minchan Kim
2020-09-21 18:43         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 18:43           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: add a vmap_pfn function Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: use vmap in shmem_pin_map Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 19:11   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-21 19:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-21 19:11     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-22  6:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22  6:22       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22  8:23       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-22  8:23         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-22  8:23         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-22 14:31         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 14:31           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 16:13           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-22 16:13             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-22 16:13             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-22 16:33             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 16:33               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 17:04               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-22 17:04                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-22 17:04                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-23  6:11                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23  6:11                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 11:21       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-22 11:21         ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-22 11:21         ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-22 14:39         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-09-22 14:39           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 14:53           ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-22 14:53             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-22 14:53             ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-18 16:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: use vmap in i915_gem_object_map Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23  9:52   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-23  9:52     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-23  9:52     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-23 13:41     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23 13:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23 13:58       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-23 13:58         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-23 13:58         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-23 14:44         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23 14:44           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 12:22           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-24 12:22             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-24 12:22             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-24 13:23             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 13:23               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] xen/xenbus: use apply_to_page_range directly in xenbus_map_ring_pv Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/xen: open code alloc_vm_area in arch_gnttab_valloc Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 16:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 20:44   ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-21 20:44     ` [Intel-gfx] " boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-21 20:44     ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-22 14:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 14:58       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 15:24       ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-22 15:24         ` [Intel-gfx] " boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-22 15:24         ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-22 15:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 15:27           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 15:34           ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-22 15:34             ` [Intel-gfx] " boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-22 15:34             ` boris.ostrovsky
2020-09-18 17:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/6] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area Patchwork
2020-09-21 17:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/6] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area (rev2) Patchwork
2020-09-21 18:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/6] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area (rev3) Patchwork
2020-09-22 14:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/6] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area (rev4) Patchwork
2020-09-22 15:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/6] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area (rev5) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200922143906.GB26664@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.