From: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com> To: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@st.com> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>, "moderated list:ARM/STI ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: st_lpc_wdt: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:51:55 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201029145155.7ihr3nfjuuufao4d@Rk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <23c07a77-2ce3-1ebd-c8d7-001cd896f157@st.com> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:58:30AM +0000, Patrice CHOTARD wrote: >Hi Coiby > >On 10/29/20 8:53 AM, Coiby Xu wrote: >> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG. >> >> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c >> index 14ab6559c748..c1428d63dc9e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c >> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c >> @@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ static int st_wdog_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> static int st_wdog_suspend(struct device *dev) >> { >> struct st_wdog *st_wdog = watchdog_get_drvdata(&st_wdog_dev); >> @@ -285,7 +284,6 @@ static int st_wdog_resume(struct device *dev) >> >> return 0; >> } >> -#endif >> >> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(st_wdog_pm_ops, >> st_wdog_suspend, > >Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> > Thank you for reviewing the patch and giving the credit despite the compiling issue with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP disabled as pointed by Guenter and others:) >Thanks > >Patrice -- Best regards, Coiby
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com> To: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@st.com> Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>, "moderated list:ARM/STI ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, "open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: st_lpc_wdt: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:51:55 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201029145155.7ihr3nfjuuufao4d@Rk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <23c07a77-2ce3-1ebd-c8d7-001cd896f157@st.com> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:58:30AM +0000, Patrice CHOTARD wrote: >Hi Coiby > >On 10/29/20 8:53 AM, Coiby Xu wrote: >> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG. >> >> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c >> index 14ab6559c748..c1428d63dc9e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c >> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c >> @@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ static int st_wdog_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> static int st_wdog_suspend(struct device *dev) >> { >> struct st_wdog *st_wdog = watchdog_get_drvdata(&st_wdog_dev); >> @@ -285,7 +284,6 @@ static int st_wdog_resume(struct device *dev) >> >> return 0; >> } >> -#endif >> >> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(st_wdog_pm_ops, >> st_wdog_suspend, > >Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> > Thank you for reviewing the patch and giving the credit despite the compiling issue with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP disabled as pointed by Guenter and others:) >Thanks > >Patrice -- Best regards, Coiby _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 14:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-29 7:53 [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: watchdog: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 7:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: st_lpc_wdt: " Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 7:53 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 7:58 ` Patrice CHOTARD 2020-10-29 7:58 ` Patrice CHOTARD 2020-10-29 13:13 ` Patrice CHOTARD 2020-10-29 13:13 ` Patrice CHOTARD 2020-10-29 14:51 ` Coiby Xu [this message] 2020-10-29 14:51 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 13:03 ` Guenter Roeck 2020-10-29 13:03 ` Guenter Roeck 2020-10-29 7:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: sirfsoc_wdt: " Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 7:53 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 13:05 ` Guenter Roeck 2020-10-29 13:05 ` Guenter Roeck 2020-10-29 14:30 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 14:30 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: watchdog: " Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201029145155.7ihr3nfjuuufao4d@Rk \ --to=coiby.xu@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \ --cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \ --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.