From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, "open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>, "moderated list:ARM/CSR SIRFPRIMA2 MACHINE SUPPORT" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: sirfsoc_wdt: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:05:21 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <41e73435-375f-1865-69ce-462395476258@roeck-us.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201029075327.228570-3-coiby.xu@gmail.com> On 10/29/20 12:53 AM, Coiby Xu wrote: > SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG. > > Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c > index 734cf2966ecb..dc8341cd7d44 100644 > --- a/drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c > @@ -170,7 +170,6 @@ static int sirfsoc_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > static int sirfsoc_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev) And again: __maybe_unused I would suggest to test compile the code with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP disabled. > { > return 0; > @@ -189,7 +188,6 @@ static int sirfsoc_wdt_resume(struct device *dev) > > return 0; > } > -#endif > > static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sirfsoc_wdt_pm_ops, > sirfsoc_wdt_suspend, sirfsoc_wdt_resume); >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, "open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>, "moderated list:ARM/CSR SIRFPRIMA2 MACHINE SUPPORT" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: sirfsoc_wdt: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:05:21 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <41e73435-375f-1865-69ce-462395476258@roeck-us.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201029075327.228570-3-coiby.xu@gmail.com> On 10/29/20 12:53 AM, Coiby Xu wrote: > SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG. > > Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c > index 734cf2966ecb..dc8341cd7d44 100644 > --- a/drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sirfsoc_wdt.c > @@ -170,7 +170,6 @@ static int sirfsoc_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > static int sirfsoc_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev) And again: __maybe_unused I would suggest to test compile the code with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP disabled. > { > return 0; > @@ -189,7 +188,6 @@ static int sirfsoc_wdt_resume(struct device *dev) > > return 0; > } > -#endif > > static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sirfsoc_wdt_pm_ops, > sirfsoc_wdt_suspend, sirfsoc_wdt_resume); > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 13:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-29 7:53 [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: watchdog: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 7:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: st_lpc_wdt: " Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 7:53 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 7:58 ` Patrice CHOTARD 2020-10-29 7:58 ` Patrice CHOTARD 2020-10-29 13:13 ` Patrice CHOTARD 2020-10-29 13:13 ` Patrice CHOTARD 2020-10-29 14:51 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 14:51 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 13:03 ` Guenter Roeck 2020-10-29 13:03 ` Guenter Roeck 2020-10-29 7:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: sirfsoc_wdt: " Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 7:53 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 13:05 ` Guenter Roeck [this message] 2020-10-29 13:05 ` Guenter Roeck 2020-10-29 14:30 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 14:30 ` Coiby Xu 2020-10-29 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: watchdog: " Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=41e73435-375f-1865-69ce-462395476258@roeck-us.net \ --to=linux@roeck-us.net \ --cc=baohua@kernel.org \ --cc=coiby.xu@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.