Re: [PATCH 17/19] drm/radeon/radeon_kms: Fix misnaming of 'radeon_info_ioctl's dev param

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:10:13PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> 
> > Hi Alex,
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 02:50:35PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 4:50 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c:226: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'radeon_info_ioctl'
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c:226: warning: Excess function parameter 'rdev' description in 'radeon_info_ioctl'
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> > > > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> > > > Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > > > index 0d8fbabffcead..21c206795c364 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > > > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void radeon_set_filp_rights(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > >  /**
> > > >   * radeon_info_ioctl - answer a device specific request.
> > > >   *
> > > > - * @rdev: radeon device pointer
> > > > + * @dev: radeon device pointer
> > > 
> > > This should be:
> > > + * @dev: drm device pointer
> > 
> > good spot. I am continuing the work on radeon and will post a patchset
> > that contains only radeon fixes with Lee's patches and a few more by me.
> > I will fix the above.
> 
> What do you mean by "continuing on"?
> 
> How will you prevent your work from conflicting with my current effort?

Quoting from previous mail in this thread:

  "
  > > How would you like me to move forward?
  >
  > Fix the thousand of warnings in other places :-)
  > I will take a look at radeon and post a new series based on your work
  > with all W=1 warnings fixed.

  I'll drop this patch and carry on ploughing through the rest of them.
"

Here I promised you to fix all warnings in the radeon driver.
And despite this being more work than anticipated a promise is a
promise. So therefore I started working on this.

If you want to do the rest of the radeon driver you are welcome and I
will gladly drop this again. Just let me know your preference.

	Sam