From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add switchdev support Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:20:34 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201130172034.GF2073444@lunn.ch> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201130082046.16292-4-vigneshr@ti.com> > +static int am65_cpsw_port_stp_state_set(struct am65_cpsw_port *port, > + struct switchdev_trans *trans, u8 state) > +{ > + struct am65_cpsw_common *cpsw = port->common; > + u8 cpsw_state; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans)) > + return 0; > + > + switch (state) { > + case BR_STATE_FORWARDING: > + cpsw_state = ALE_PORT_STATE_FORWARD; > + break; > + case BR_STATE_LEARNING: > + cpsw_state = ALE_PORT_STATE_LEARN; > + break; > + case BR_STATE_DISABLED: > + cpsw_state = ALE_PORT_STATE_DISABLE; > + break; > + case BR_STATE_LISTENING: > + case BR_STATE_BLOCKING: > + cpsw_state = ALE_PORT_STATE_BLOCK; > + break; > + default: > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } Strictly speaking, the: > + if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans)) > + return 0; should be here. In the prepare phase, you are suppose to validate you can do the requested action, and return an error is not. In second phase, actually carrying out the action, you then never return an error. But in this case, you are handling all the bridge states, so it should not matter. Andrew
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add switchdev support Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:20:34 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201130172034.GF2073444@lunn.ch> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201130082046.16292-4-vigneshr@ti.com> > +static int am65_cpsw_port_stp_state_set(struct am65_cpsw_port *port, > + struct switchdev_trans *trans, u8 state) > +{ > + struct am65_cpsw_common *cpsw = port->common; > + u8 cpsw_state; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans)) > + return 0; > + > + switch (state) { > + case BR_STATE_FORWARDING: > + cpsw_state = ALE_PORT_STATE_FORWARD; > + break; > + case BR_STATE_LEARNING: > + cpsw_state = ALE_PORT_STATE_LEARN; > + break; > + case BR_STATE_DISABLED: > + cpsw_state = ALE_PORT_STATE_DISABLE; > + break; > + case BR_STATE_LISTENING: > + case BR_STATE_BLOCKING: > + cpsw_state = ALE_PORT_STATE_BLOCK; > + break; > + default: > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } Strictly speaking, the: > + if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans)) > + return 0; should be here. In the prepare phase, you are suppose to validate you can do the requested action, and return an error is not. In second phase, actually carrying out the action, you then never return an error. But in this case, you are handling all the bridge states, so it should not matter. Andrew _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 17:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-30 8:20 [PATCH 0/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add switchdev driver Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 8:20 ` Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add devlink support Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 8:20 ` Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 15:50 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-11-30 15:50 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-03 8:40 ` Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-12-03 8:40 ` Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-12-03 14:18 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-03 14:18 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-03 16:22 ` Grygorii Strashko 2020-12-03 16:22 ` Grygorii Strashko 2020-11-30 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add netdevice notifiers Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 8:20 ` Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 8:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add switchdev support Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 8:20 ` Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 17:20 ` Andrew Lunn [this message] 2020-11-30 17:20 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-03 13:49 ` Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-12-03 13:49 ` Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 8:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] docs: networking: ti: Add driver doc for AM65 NUSS switch driver Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-11-30 8:20 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201130172034.GF2073444@lunn.ch \ --to=andrew@lunn.ch \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \ --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.