* [dunfell/master][PATCH] optee-os: as meta-ti now has upstream 3.11, drop local fork
@ 2020-12-17 21:42 Denys Dmytriyenko
2020-12-17 23:31 ` Bajjuri, Praneeth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2020-12-17 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta-arago
There's no need for ti-optee-os fork any more, as it's exactly the same as upstream
Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
---
meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
deleted file mode 100644
index 677c6dd..0000000
--- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-PR_append = ".arago0"
-
-SRC_URI = "git://git.ti.com/optee/ti-optee-os.git;branch=${BRANCH} \
- file://0001-allow-setting-sysroot-for-libgcc-lookup.patch \
-"
-BRANCH = "ti-optee-os"
-SRCREV = "199fca17b575d4c748c9c435e908a6ec9618c75a"
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dunfell/master][PATCH] optee-os: as meta-ti now has upstream 3.11, drop local fork
2020-12-17 21:42 [dunfell/master][PATCH] optee-os: as meta-ti now has upstream 3.11, drop local fork Denys Dmytriyenko
@ 2020-12-17 23:31 ` Bajjuri, Praneeth
2020-12-21 23:59 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bajjuri, Praneeth @ 2020-12-17 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denys Dmytriyenko, meta-arago
On 12/17/2020 3:42 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> There's no need for ti-optee-os fork any more, as it's exactly the same as upstream
Thanks Denys for the fix.
This along with the meta-ti patch helped in building 3.11 on sdk builds.
One question though, While there is no difference today between TI and
upstream optee, Any reason why we cannot use the forked project?
Similar to how we are doing with ATF today ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
> ---
> meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
>
> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 677c6dd..0000000
> --- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
> -PR_append = ".arago0"
> -
> -SRC_URI = "git://git.ti.com/optee/ti-optee-os.git;branch=${BRANCH} \
> - file://0001-allow-setting-sysroot-for-libgcc-lookup.patch \
> -"
> -BRANCH = "ti-optee-os"
> -SRCREV = "199fca17b575d4c748c9c435e908a6ec9618c75a"
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dunfell/master][PATCH] optee-os: as meta-ti now has upstream 3.11, drop local fork
2020-12-17 23:31 ` Bajjuri, Praneeth
@ 2020-12-21 23:59 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2021-01-05 16:04 ` Bajjuri, Praneeth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2020-12-21 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bajjuri, Praneeth; +Cc: meta-arago
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:31:23PM -0600, Bajjuri, Praneeth wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/2020 3:42 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >There's no need for ti-optee-os fork any more, as it's exactly the same as upstream
>
> Thanks Denys for the fix.
>
> This along with the meta-ti patch helped in building 3.11 on sdk builds.
>
> One question though, While there is no difference today between TI
> and upstream optee, Any reason why we cannot use the forked project?
> Similar to how we are doing with ATF today ?
Praneeth,
From the community perspective, it's a bad practice to fork an upstream
project "just in case", when there are no real differences...
Denys
> >Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
> >---
> > meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend | 7 -------
> > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
> >
> >diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
> >deleted file mode 100644
> >index 677c6dd..0000000
> >--- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
> >+++ /dev/null
> >@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
> >-PR_append = ".arago0"
> >-
> >-SRC_URI = "git://git.ti.com/optee/ti-optee-os.git;branch=${BRANCH} \
> >- file://0001-allow-setting-sysroot-for-libgcc-lookup.patch \
> >-"
> >-BRANCH = "ti-optee-os"
> >-SRCREV = "199fca17b575d4c748c9c435e908a6ec9618c75a"
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dunfell/master][PATCH] optee-os: as meta-ti now has upstream 3.11, drop local fork
2020-12-21 23:59 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
@ 2021-01-05 16:04 ` Bajjuri, Praneeth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bajjuri, Praneeth @ 2021-01-05 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denys Dmytriyenko; +Cc: meta-arago
On 12/21/2020 5:59 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:31:23PM -0600, Bajjuri, Praneeth wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/17/2020 3:42 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>>> There's no need for ti-optee-os fork any more, as it's exactly the same as upstream
>>
>> Thanks Denys for the fix.
>>
>> This along with the meta-ti patch helped in building 3.11 on sdk builds.
>>
>> One question though, While there is no difference today between TI
>> and upstream optee, Any reason why we cannot use the forked project?
>> Similar to how we are doing with ATF today ?
>
> Praneeth,
>
> From the community perspective, it's a bad practice to fork an upstream
> project "just in case", when there are no real differences...
Thanks for the explanation, makes sense.
We should be doing the same way for ATF too.
>
> Denys
>
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
Reviewed-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend | 7 -------
>>> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
>>> deleted file mode 100644
>>> index 677c6dd..0000000
>>> --- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-security/optee/optee-os_git.bbappend
>>> +++ /dev/null
>>> @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
>>> -PR_append = ".arago0"
>>> -
>>> -SRC_URI = "git://git.ti.com/optee/ti-optee-os.git;branch=${BRANCH} \
>>> - file://0001-allow-setting-sysroot-for-libgcc-lookup.patch \
>>> -"
>>> -BRANCH = "ti-optee-os"
>>> -SRCREV = "199fca17b575d4c748c9c435e908a6ec9618c75a"
>>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-05 16:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-17 21:42 [dunfell/master][PATCH] optee-os: as meta-ti now has upstream 3.11, drop local fork Denys Dmytriyenko
2020-12-17 23:31 ` Bajjuri, Praneeth
2020-12-21 23:59 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2021-01-05 16:04 ` Bajjuri, Praneeth
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.