From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:32:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201222203221.GA10029@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPcZ6diMrSxAK4LyvViAmaMNwa_Bz2B4hYUapz5YK6CSnw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:25:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 19:28, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:17 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:09:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive
> > > > > > > > > touch interface support.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for
> > > > > > > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Add bindings for it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > Changes for v2:
> > > > > > > > > - updated commit message
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++
> > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties:
> > > > > > > > > items:
> > > > > > > > > - enum:
> > > > > > > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit
> > > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM
> > > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't
> > > > > > > > match.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible.
> > > > > > > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm",
> > > > > > > "fsl,imx8mm";
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml
> > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb
> > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb
> > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb
> > > > > > > ..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you let me know what I missed here?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or
> > > > > > something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit
> > > > > > the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1
> > > > > > at patch #5. No changes here stil.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build
> > > > > log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build.
> > > > >
> > > > > # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml
> > > >
> > > > 1. Wrong path to schema file,
> > > > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check,
> > > > right?
> > >
> > > But kbuild is building the fsl.yaml I did verify with by adding some
> > > wrong character in the file, it is showing build issues.
> > >
> > > Please check the clean log.
> > >
> > > # make mrproper
> > > CLEAN Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> > > CLEAN scripts/basic
> > > CLEAN scripts/dtc
> > > # make dt_binding_check
> > > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o
> > > LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c
> > > YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.[ch]
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/yamltree.o
> > > HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc
> > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml:
> > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml:
> > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml:
> > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml:
> > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml:
> > > ignoring, error in schema:
> > > warning: no schema found in file:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml:
> > > ignoring, error in schema:
> > > warning: no schema found in file:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: ignoring,
> > > error in schema:
> > > warning: no schema found in file:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml:
> > > ignoring, error in schema:
> > > warning: no schema found in file:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml
> > > DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dts
> > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml
> > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml
> >
> > Any further comments? I'm planning to send v3.
>
> What comments do you need? Your schema and DTS are wrong. If you run
> dtbs_check, which I mentioned in the first email, you would see the
> result. Instead you pasted unrelevant check of other bindings and
> later pasted dt_binding_check. It does not make sense, so I clarified:
> > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, right?
>
> And you pasted dt_binding_check, so it kind of closes the discussion.
> I don't know what to add more.
> I reported this problem already in v1, so please don't send the same
> wrong code for the third time.
Let's make it obvious:
$ make -j4 dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/dev/linux/linux/out'
UPD include/config/kernel.release
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml
CHECK arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml
/home/dev/linux/linux/out/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml: /: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
['engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2', 'engicam,icore-mx8mm', 'fsl,imx8mm'] is too long
Additional items are not allowed ('fsl,imx8mm' was unexpected)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:32:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201222203221.GA10029@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPcZ6diMrSxAK4LyvViAmaMNwa_Bz2B4hYUapz5YK6CSnw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:25:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 19:28, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:17 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:09:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive
> > > > > > > > > touch interface support.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for
> > > > > > > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Add bindings for it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > Changes for v2:
> > > > > > > > > - updated commit message
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++
> > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties:
> > > > > > > > > items:
> > > > > > > > > - enum:
> > > > > > > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit
> > > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM
> > > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't
> > > > > > > > match.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible.
> > > > > > > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm",
> > > > > > > "fsl,imx8mm";
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml
> > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb
> > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb
> > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb
> > > > > > > ..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you let me know what I missed here?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or
> > > > > > something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit
> > > > > > the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1
> > > > > > at patch #5. No changes here stil.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build
> > > > > log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build.
> > > > >
> > > > > # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml
> > > >
> > > > 1. Wrong path to schema file,
> > > > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check,
> > > > right?
> > >
> > > But kbuild is building the fsl.yaml I did verify with by adding some
> > > wrong character in the file, it is showing build issues.
> > >
> > > Please check the clean log.
> > >
> > > # make mrproper
> > > CLEAN Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> > > CLEAN scripts/basic
> > > CLEAN scripts/dtc
> > > # make dt_binding_check
> > > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o
> > > LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c
> > > YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.[ch]
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o
> > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/yamltree.o
> > > HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc
> > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml:
> > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml:
> > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml:
> > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml:
> > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml:
> > > ignoring, error in schema:
> > > warning: no schema found in file:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml:
> > > ignoring, error in schema:
> > > warning: no schema found in file:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: ignoring,
> > > error in schema:
> > > warning: no schema found in file:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml
> > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml:
> > > ignoring, error in schema:
> > > warning: no schema found in file:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml
> > > DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dts
> > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml
> > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml
> >
> > Any further comments? I'm planning to send v3.
>
> What comments do you need? Your schema and DTS are wrong. If you run
> dtbs_check, which I mentioned in the first email, you would see the
> result. Instead you pasted unrelevant check of other bindings and
> later pasted dt_binding_check. It does not make sense, so I clarified:
> > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, right?
>
> And you pasted dt_binding_check, so it kind of closes the discussion.
> I don't know what to add more.
> I reported this problem already in v1, so please don't send the same
> wrong code for the third time.
Let's make it obvious:
$ make -j4 dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/dev/linux/linux/out'
UPD include/config/kernel.release
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml
CHECK arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml
/home/dev/linux/linux/out/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml: /: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
['engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2', 'engicam,icore-mx8mm', 'fsl,imx8mm'] is too long
Additional items are not allowed ('fsl,imx8mm' was unexpected)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-22 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-21 11:31 [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: defconfig: Enable REGULATOR_PF8X00 Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 13:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 13:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 13:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 13:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 13:59 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 13:59 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 14:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 14:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 14:39 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 14:39 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 14:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 14:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 14:47 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 14:47 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-22 18:28 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-22 18:28 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-22 20:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-22 20:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-22 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2020-12-22 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SoM Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 13:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 13:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 14:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 14:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini EDIMM2.2 Starter Kit Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: " Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 11:31 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 14:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 14:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 19:33 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 19:33 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-21 21:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-21 21:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-22 8:50 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-22 8:50 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-22 8:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-22 8:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-12-22 9:05 ` Jagan Teki
2020-12-22 9:05 ` Jagan Teki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201222203221.GA10029@kozik-lap \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.