All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.NV system register traps
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:05:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210129180514.58d7a261@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210160002.1407373-8-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:59:03 +0000
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:

Hi,

> From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> 
> ARM v8.3 introduces a new bit in the HCR_EL2, which is the NV bit. When
> this bit is set, accessing EL2 registers in EL1 traps to EL2. In
> addition, executing the following instructions in EL1 will trap to EL2:
> tlbi, at, eret, and msr/mrs instructions to access SP_EL1. Most of the
> instructions that trap to EL2 with the NV bit were undef at EL1 prior to
> ARM v8.3. The only instruction that was not undef is eret.
> 
> This patch sets up a handler for EL2 registers and SP_EL1 register
> accesses at EL1. The host hypervisor keeps those register values in
> memory, and will emulate their behavior.
> 
> This patch doesn't set the NV bit yet. It will be set in a later patch
> once nested virtualization support is completed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> [maz: added SCTLR_EL2 RES0/RES1 handling]
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

I compared the system register encodings in the first hunk against the
ARMv8 ARM, they are all fine.
I also checked the last hunk for (copy&paste) typos, all good as well.

Some comments below:

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  44 ++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 82521cdbfc1c..05b49eafbb49 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -469,19 +469,50 @@
>  
>  #define SYS_PMCCFILTR_EL0		sys_reg(3, 3, 14, 15, 7)
>  
> +#define SYS_VPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_VMPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 5)
> +
>  #define SYS_SCTLR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_ACTLR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_HCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_MDCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 1)
> +#define SYS_CPTR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 2)
> +#define SYS_HSTR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 3)
> +#define SYS_HACR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 7)
> +
>  #define SYS_ZCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 2, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_TTBR0_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_TTBR1_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_VTTBR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_VTCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 2)
> +
>  #define SYS_DACR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 0, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_SPSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_ELR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_SP_EL1			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_IFSR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_AFSR0_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_AFSR1_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 1, 1)
>  #define SYS_ESR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 2, 0)
>  #define SYS_VSESR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 2, 3)
>  #define SYS_FPEXC32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 3, 0)
>  #define SYS_TFSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 6, 0)
>  #define SYS_FAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 0)
>  
> -#define SYS_VDISR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 1,  1)
> +#define SYS_FAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_HPFAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 4)
> +
> +#define SYS_MAIR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 2, 0)
> +#define SYS_AMAIR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 3, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_VBAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_RVBAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_RMR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_VDISR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 1, 1)
>  #define __SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(x)		sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 8, x)
>  #define SYS_ICH_AP0R0_EL2		__SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(0)
>  #define SYS_ICH_AP0R1_EL2		__SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(1)
> @@ -523,15 +554,24 @@
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR14_EL2		__SYS__LR8_EL2(6)
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR15_EL2		__SYS__LR8_EL2(7)
>  
> +#define SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2		sys_reg(3, 4, 13, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 13, 0, 2)
> +
> +#define SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 0, 3)
> +#define SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 1, 0)
> +
>  /* VHE encodings for architectural EL0/1 system registers */
>  #define SYS_SCTLR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_CPACR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 2)
>  #define SYS_ZCR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 2, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_TTBR0_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_TTBR1_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 1)
>  #define SYS_TCR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 2)
> +
>  #define SYS_SPSR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_ELR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 1)
> +
>  #define SYS_AFSR0_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 0)
>  #define SYS_AFSR1_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 1)
>  #define SYS_ESR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 2, 0)
> @@ -549,6 +589,8 @@
>  #define SYS_CNTV_CTL_EL02		sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 1)
>  #define SYS_CNTV_CVAL_EL02		sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 2)
>  
> +#define SYS_SP_EL2			sys_reg(3, 6,  4, 1, 0)
> +
>  /* Common SCTLR_ELx flags. */
>  #define SCTLR_ELx_DSSBS	(BIT(44))
>  #define SCTLR_ELx_ATA	(BIT(43))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 3313dedfa505..c049867a39bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,57 @@ static u32 get_ccsidr(u32 csselr)
>  	return ccsidr;
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_rw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +		      struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +		      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, r->reg);
> +	else
> +		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +		      struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +		      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
> +
> +	p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_sctlr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			     struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			     const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write) {
> +		u64 val = p->regval;
> +
> +		if (vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu) && vcpu_el2_tge_is_set(vcpu)) {
> +			val &= ~(GENMASK_ULL(63,45) | GENMASK_ULL(34, 32) |

In ARMv8 ARM F.c bits 49-45 are used for the TWE delay value. The
manual says it's RES0 when FEAT_TWED is not implemented, but this is
true for a lot of other feature bits we don't implement? So shall we
let a guest set them, reducing the mask to (63,50)?

> +				 BIT_ULL(17));

The ARMv8 ARM F.c lists bit 9 as RES0 as well for (E2H,TGE)=(1,1).

> +			val |=  SCTLR_EL1_RES1;
> +		} else {
> +			val &= ~(GENMASK_ULL(63,45) | BIT_ULL(42) |
> +				 GENMASK_ULL(39, 38) | GENMASK_ULL(35, 32) |
> +				 BIT_ULL(26) | BIT_ULL(24) | BIT_ULL(20) |
> +				 BIT_ULL(17) | GENMASK_ULL(15, 14) |
> +				 GENMASK(10, 7));
> +			val |=  SCTLR_EL2_RES1;
> +		}
> +
> +		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, val, r->reg);
> +	} else {
> +		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * See note at ARMv7 ARM B1.14.4 (TL;DR: S/W ops are not easily virtualized).
>   */
> @@ -342,12 +393,9 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
> -	if (p->is_write) {
> -		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, r->reg);
> +	access_rw(vcpu, p, r);
> +	if (p->is_write)
>  		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
> -	} else {
> -		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> -	}
>  
>  	trace_trap_reg(__func__, r->reg, p->is_write, p->regval);
>  
> @@ -1314,6 +1362,18 @@ static bool access_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  	.set_user = set_raz_id_reg,		\
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SP_EL1) = p->regval;
> +	else
> +		p->regval = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SP_EL1);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Architected system registers.
>   * Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
> @@ -1692,9 +1752,51 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>  	 */
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMCCFILTR_EL0), access_pmu_evtyper, reset_val, PMCCFILTR_EL0, 0 },
>  
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VMPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VMPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SCTLR_EL2), access_sctlr_el2, reset_val, SCTLR_EL2, SCTLR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ACTLR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ACTLR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HCR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MDCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, MDCR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CPTR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CPTR_EL2, CPTR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HSTR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HSTR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HACR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HACR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR0_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TTBR0_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR1_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TTBR1_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TCR_EL2, TCR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTTBR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTTBR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTCR_EL2, 0 },
> +
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ELR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
> +
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR0_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AFSR0_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR1_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AFSR1_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ESR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ESR_EL2, 0 },
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, FAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HPFAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HPFAR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MAIR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, MAIR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMAIR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AMAIR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VBAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RVBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, RVBAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RMR_EL2), access_wi, reset_val, RMR_EL2, 1 },


Why is this WI, exactly? Isn't EL2 the highest implemented EL from a
guest's point of view, and thus a write to RMR_EL2 with bit 1 set should
trigger a reset (to AArch64)?
I see that we don't NEED to implement this register (as we don't
support AArch32), but that should look differently here then?

The rest looks alright to me.

Cheers,
Andre

> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CONTEXTIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CNTVOFF_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CNTHCTL_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, SP_EL2 },
>  };
>  
>  static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.NV system register traps
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:05:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210129180514.58d7a261@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210160002.1407373-8-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:59:03 +0000
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:

Hi,

> From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> 
> ARM v8.3 introduces a new bit in the HCR_EL2, which is the NV bit. When
> this bit is set, accessing EL2 registers in EL1 traps to EL2. In
> addition, executing the following instructions in EL1 will trap to EL2:
> tlbi, at, eret, and msr/mrs instructions to access SP_EL1. Most of the
> instructions that trap to EL2 with the NV bit were undef at EL1 prior to
> ARM v8.3. The only instruction that was not undef is eret.
> 
> This patch sets up a handler for EL2 registers and SP_EL1 register
> accesses at EL1. The host hypervisor keeps those register values in
> memory, and will emulate their behavior.
> 
> This patch doesn't set the NV bit yet. It will be set in a later patch
> once nested virtualization support is completed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> [maz: added SCTLR_EL2 RES0/RES1 handling]
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

I compared the system register encodings in the first hunk against the
ARMv8 ARM, they are all fine.
I also checked the last hunk for (copy&paste) typos, all good as well.

Some comments below:

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  44 ++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 82521cdbfc1c..05b49eafbb49 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -469,19 +469,50 @@
>  
>  #define SYS_PMCCFILTR_EL0		sys_reg(3, 3, 14, 15, 7)
>  
> +#define SYS_VPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_VMPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 5)
> +
>  #define SYS_SCTLR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_ACTLR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_HCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_MDCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 1)
> +#define SYS_CPTR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 2)
> +#define SYS_HSTR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 3)
> +#define SYS_HACR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 7)
> +
>  #define SYS_ZCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 2, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_TTBR0_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_TTBR1_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_VTTBR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_VTCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 2)
> +
>  #define SYS_DACR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 0, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_SPSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_ELR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_SP_EL1			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_IFSR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_AFSR0_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_AFSR1_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 1, 1)
>  #define SYS_ESR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 2, 0)
>  #define SYS_VSESR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 2, 3)
>  #define SYS_FPEXC32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 3, 0)
>  #define SYS_TFSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 6, 0)
>  #define SYS_FAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 0)
>  
> -#define SYS_VDISR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 1,  1)
> +#define SYS_FAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_HPFAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 4)
> +
> +#define SYS_MAIR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 2, 0)
> +#define SYS_AMAIR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 3, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_VBAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_RVBAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_RMR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_VDISR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 1, 1)
>  #define __SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(x)		sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 8, x)
>  #define SYS_ICH_AP0R0_EL2		__SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(0)
>  #define SYS_ICH_AP0R1_EL2		__SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(1)
> @@ -523,15 +554,24 @@
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR14_EL2		__SYS__LR8_EL2(6)
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR15_EL2		__SYS__LR8_EL2(7)
>  
> +#define SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2		sys_reg(3, 4, 13, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 13, 0, 2)
> +
> +#define SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 0, 3)
> +#define SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 1, 0)
> +
>  /* VHE encodings for architectural EL0/1 system registers */
>  #define SYS_SCTLR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_CPACR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 2)
>  #define SYS_ZCR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 2, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_TTBR0_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_TTBR1_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 1)
>  #define SYS_TCR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 2)
> +
>  #define SYS_SPSR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_ELR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 1)
> +
>  #define SYS_AFSR0_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 0)
>  #define SYS_AFSR1_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 1)
>  #define SYS_ESR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 2, 0)
> @@ -549,6 +589,8 @@
>  #define SYS_CNTV_CTL_EL02		sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 1)
>  #define SYS_CNTV_CVAL_EL02		sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 2)
>  
> +#define SYS_SP_EL2			sys_reg(3, 6,  4, 1, 0)
> +
>  /* Common SCTLR_ELx flags. */
>  #define SCTLR_ELx_DSSBS	(BIT(44))
>  #define SCTLR_ELx_ATA	(BIT(43))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 3313dedfa505..c049867a39bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,57 @@ static u32 get_ccsidr(u32 csselr)
>  	return ccsidr;
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_rw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +		      struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +		      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, r->reg);
> +	else
> +		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +		      struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +		      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
> +
> +	p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_sctlr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			     struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			     const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write) {
> +		u64 val = p->regval;
> +
> +		if (vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu) && vcpu_el2_tge_is_set(vcpu)) {
> +			val &= ~(GENMASK_ULL(63,45) | GENMASK_ULL(34, 32) |

In ARMv8 ARM F.c bits 49-45 are used for the TWE delay value. The
manual says it's RES0 when FEAT_TWED is not implemented, but this is
true for a lot of other feature bits we don't implement? So shall we
let a guest set them, reducing the mask to (63,50)?

> +				 BIT_ULL(17));

The ARMv8 ARM F.c lists bit 9 as RES0 as well for (E2H,TGE)=(1,1).

> +			val |=  SCTLR_EL1_RES1;
> +		} else {
> +			val &= ~(GENMASK_ULL(63,45) | BIT_ULL(42) |
> +				 GENMASK_ULL(39, 38) | GENMASK_ULL(35, 32) |
> +				 BIT_ULL(26) | BIT_ULL(24) | BIT_ULL(20) |
> +				 BIT_ULL(17) | GENMASK_ULL(15, 14) |
> +				 GENMASK(10, 7));
> +			val |=  SCTLR_EL2_RES1;
> +		}
> +
> +		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, val, r->reg);
> +	} else {
> +		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * See note at ARMv7 ARM B1.14.4 (TL;DR: S/W ops are not easily virtualized).
>   */
> @@ -342,12 +393,9 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
> -	if (p->is_write) {
> -		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, r->reg);
> +	access_rw(vcpu, p, r);
> +	if (p->is_write)
>  		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
> -	} else {
> -		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> -	}
>  
>  	trace_trap_reg(__func__, r->reg, p->is_write, p->regval);
>  
> @@ -1314,6 +1362,18 @@ static bool access_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  	.set_user = set_raz_id_reg,		\
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SP_EL1) = p->regval;
> +	else
> +		p->regval = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SP_EL1);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Architected system registers.
>   * Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
> @@ -1692,9 +1752,51 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>  	 */
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMCCFILTR_EL0), access_pmu_evtyper, reset_val, PMCCFILTR_EL0, 0 },
>  
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VMPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VMPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SCTLR_EL2), access_sctlr_el2, reset_val, SCTLR_EL2, SCTLR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ACTLR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ACTLR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HCR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MDCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, MDCR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CPTR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CPTR_EL2, CPTR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HSTR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HSTR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HACR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HACR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR0_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TTBR0_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR1_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TTBR1_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TCR_EL2, TCR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTTBR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTTBR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTCR_EL2, 0 },
> +
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ELR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
> +
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR0_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AFSR0_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR1_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AFSR1_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ESR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ESR_EL2, 0 },
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, FAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HPFAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HPFAR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MAIR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, MAIR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMAIR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AMAIR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VBAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RVBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, RVBAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RMR_EL2), access_wi, reset_val, RMR_EL2, 1 },


Why is this WI, exactly? Isn't EL2 the highest implemented EL from a
guest's point of view, and thus a write to RMR_EL2 with bit 1 set should
trigger a reset (to AArch64)?
I see that we don't NEED to implement this register (as we don't
support AArch32), but that should look differently here then?

The rest looks alright to me.

Cheers,
Andre

> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CONTEXTIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CNTVOFF_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CNTHCTL_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, SP_EL2 },
>  };
>  
>  static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.NV system register traps
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:05:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210129180514.58d7a261@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210160002.1407373-8-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:59:03 +0000
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:

Hi,

> From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> 
> ARM v8.3 introduces a new bit in the HCR_EL2, which is the NV bit. When
> this bit is set, accessing EL2 registers in EL1 traps to EL2. In
> addition, executing the following instructions in EL1 will trap to EL2:
> tlbi, at, eret, and msr/mrs instructions to access SP_EL1. Most of the
> instructions that trap to EL2 with the NV bit were undef at EL1 prior to
> ARM v8.3. The only instruction that was not undef is eret.
> 
> This patch sets up a handler for EL2 registers and SP_EL1 register
> accesses at EL1. The host hypervisor keeps those register values in
> memory, and will emulate their behavior.
> 
> This patch doesn't set the NV bit yet. It will be set in a later patch
> once nested virtualization support is completed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> [maz: added SCTLR_EL2 RES0/RES1 handling]
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

I compared the system register encodings in the first hunk against the
ARMv8 ARM, they are all fine.
I also checked the last hunk for (copy&paste) typos, all good as well.

Some comments below:

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  44 ++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 82521cdbfc1c..05b49eafbb49 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -469,19 +469,50 @@
>  
>  #define SYS_PMCCFILTR_EL0		sys_reg(3, 3, 14, 15, 7)
>  
> +#define SYS_VPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_VMPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 5)
> +
>  #define SYS_SCTLR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_ACTLR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_HCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_MDCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 1)
> +#define SYS_CPTR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 2)
> +#define SYS_HSTR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 3)
> +#define SYS_HACR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 7)
> +
>  #define SYS_ZCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 2, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_TTBR0_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_TTBR1_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_VTTBR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_VTCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 2)
> +
>  #define SYS_DACR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 0, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_SPSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_ELR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_SP_EL1			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_IFSR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_AFSR0_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_AFSR1_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 1, 1)
>  #define SYS_ESR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 2, 0)
>  #define SYS_VSESR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 2, 3)
>  #define SYS_FPEXC32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 3, 0)
>  #define SYS_TFSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 6, 0)
>  #define SYS_FAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 0)
>  
> -#define SYS_VDISR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 1,  1)
> +#define SYS_FAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_HPFAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 4)
> +
> +#define SYS_MAIR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 2, 0)
> +#define SYS_AMAIR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 3, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_VBAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_RVBAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_RMR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_VDISR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 1, 1)
>  #define __SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(x)		sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 8, x)
>  #define SYS_ICH_AP0R0_EL2		__SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(0)
>  #define SYS_ICH_AP0R1_EL2		__SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(1)
> @@ -523,15 +554,24 @@
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR14_EL2		__SYS__LR8_EL2(6)
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR15_EL2		__SYS__LR8_EL2(7)
>  
> +#define SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2		sys_reg(3, 4, 13, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 13, 0, 2)
> +
> +#define SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 0, 3)
> +#define SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 1, 0)
> +
>  /* VHE encodings for architectural EL0/1 system registers */
>  #define SYS_SCTLR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_CPACR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 2)
>  #define SYS_ZCR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 2, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_TTBR0_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_TTBR1_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 1)
>  #define SYS_TCR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 2)
> +
>  #define SYS_SPSR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_ELR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 1)
> +
>  #define SYS_AFSR0_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 0)
>  #define SYS_AFSR1_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 1)
>  #define SYS_ESR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 2, 0)
> @@ -549,6 +589,8 @@
>  #define SYS_CNTV_CTL_EL02		sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 1)
>  #define SYS_CNTV_CVAL_EL02		sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 2)
>  
> +#define SYS_SP_EL2			sys_reg(3, 6,  4, 1, 0)
> +
>  /* Common SCTLR_ELx flags. */
>  #define SCTLR_ELx_DSSBS	(BIT(44))
>  #define SCTLR_ELx_ATA	(BIT(43))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 3313dedfa505..c049867a39bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,57 @@ static u32 get_ccsidr(u32 csselr)
>  	return ccsidr;
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_rw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +		      struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +		      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, r->reg);
> +	else
> +		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +		      struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +		      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
> +
> +	p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_sctlr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			     struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			     const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write) {
> +		u64 val = p->regval;
> +
> +		if (vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu) && vcpu_el2_tge_is_set(vcpu)) {
> +			val &= ~(GENMASK_ULL(63,45) | GENMASK_ULL(34, 32) |

In ARMv8 ARM F.c bits 49-45 are used for the TWE delay value. The
manual says it's RES0 when FEAT_TWED is not implemented, but this is
true for a lot of other feature bits we don't implement? So shall we
let a guest set them, reducing the mask to (63,50)?

> +				 BIT_ULL(17));

The ARMv8 ARM F.c lists bit 9 as RES0 as well for (E2H,TGE)=(1,1).

> +			val |=  SCTLR_EL1_RES1;
> +		} else {
> +			val &= ~(GENMASK_ULL(63,45) | BIT_ULL(42) |
> +				 GENMASK_ULL(39, 38) | GENMASK_ULL(35, 32) |
> +				 BIT_ULL(26) | BIT_ULL(24) | BIT_ULL(20) |
> +				 BIT_ULL(17) | GENMASK_ULL(15, 14) |
> +				 GENMASK(10, 7));
> +			val |=  SCTLR_EL2_RES1;
> +		}
> +
> +		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, val, r->reg);
> +	} else {
> +		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * See note at ARMv7 ARM B1.14.4 (TL;DR: S/W ops are not easily virtualized).
>   */
> @@ -342,12 +393,9 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
> -	if (p->is_write) {
> -		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, r->reg);
> +	access_rw(vcpu, p, r);
> +	if (p->is_write)
>  		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
> -	} else {
> -		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> -	}
>  
>  	trace_trap_reg(__func__, r->reg, p->is_write, p->regval);
>  
> @@ -1314,6 +1362,18 @@ static bool access_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  	.set_user = set_raz_id_reg,		\
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SP_EL1) = p->regval;
> +	else
> +		p->regval = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SP_EL1);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Architected system registers.
>   * Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
> @@ -1692,9 +1752,51 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>  	 */
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMCCFILTR_EL0), access_pmu_evtyper, reset_val, PMCCFILTR_EL0, 0 },
>  
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VMPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VMPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SCTLR_EL2), access_sctlr_el2, reset_val, SCTLR_EL2, SCTLR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ACTLR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ACTLR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HCR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MDCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, MDCR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CPTR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CPTR_EL2, CPTR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HSTR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HSTR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HACR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HACR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR0_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TTBR0_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR1_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TTBR1_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TCR_EL2, TCR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTTBR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTTBR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTCR_EL2, 0 },
> +
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ELR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
> +
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR0_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AFSR0_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR1_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AFSR1_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ESR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ESR_EL2, 0 },
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, FAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HPFAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HPFAR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MAIR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, MAIR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMAIR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AMAIR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VBAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RVBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, RVBAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RMR_EL2), access_wi, reset_val, RMR_EL2, 1 },


Why is this WI, exactly? Isn't EL2 the highest implemented EL from a
guest's point of view, and thus a write to RMR_EL2 with bit 1 set should
trigger a reset (to AArch64)?
I see that we don't NEED to implement this register (as we don't
support AArch32), but that should look differently here then?

The rest looks alright to me.

Cheers,
Andre

> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CONTEXTIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CNTVOFF_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CNTHCTL_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, SP_EL2 },
>  };
>  
>  static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 249+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 15:58 [PATCH v3 00/66] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/66] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT cpufeature Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce nested virtualization VCPU feature Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Reset VCPU to EL2 registers if VCPU nested virt is set Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add EL2 system registers to vcpu context Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-29 18:04   ` Andre Przywara
2021-01-29 18:04     ` Andre Przywara
2021-01-29 18:04     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested virt VCPU primitives for vEL2 VCPU state Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.NV system register traps Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-29 18:05   ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2021-01-29 18:05     ` Andre Przywara
2021-01-29 18:05     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Reset VMPIDR_EL2 and VPIDR_EL2 to sane values Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Support virtual EL2 exceptions Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-29 18:05   ` Andre Przywara
2021-01-29 18:05     ` Andre Przywara
2021-01-29 18:05     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 22:05     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-16 22:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-16 22:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Inject HVC exceptions to the virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle trapped ERET from " Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add non-VHE-EL2->EL1 translation helpers Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle virtual EL2 registers in vcpu_read/write_sys_reg() Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SPSR_EL2 specially Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.E2H specially Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Save/Restore vEL2 sysregs Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 17/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate PSTATE.M for a guest hypervisor Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 18/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 19/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 from " Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 20/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in " Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 21/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 22/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TWX setting Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 23/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual CPTR_EL2.{TFP,FPEN} settings Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` [PATCH v3 23/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual CPTR_EL2.{TFP, FPEN} settings Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 24/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 25/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TVM and TRVM settings Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 26/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV1 bit setting Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 27/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate EL12 register accesses from the virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 28/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Forward debug traps to the nested guest Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 29/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Configure HCR_EL2 for nested virtualization Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 30/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Only toggle cache for virtual EL2 when SCTLR_EL2 changes Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 31/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Filter out unsupported features from ID regs Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 32/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Hide RAS from nested guests Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 33/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-21  2:59   ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-21  2:59     ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-21  2:59     ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-16 18:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-16 18:34       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-16 18:34       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 34/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested Stage-2 page table walk logic Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 35/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle shadow stage 2 page faults Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 36/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Restrict S2 RD/WR permissions to match the guest's Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 37/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 38/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce sys_reg_desc.forward_trap Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 39/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Set a handler for the system instruction traps Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 40/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap and emulate AT instructions from virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 41/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap and emulate TLBI " Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 42/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fold guest's HCR_EL2 configuration into the host's Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 43/66] KVM: arm64: nv: arch_timer: Support hyp timer emulation Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-11  0:26   ` kernel test robot
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 44/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of EL2-specific timer registers Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 45/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Load timer before the GIC Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 46/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Nested GICv3 Support Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 47/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't load the GICv4 context on entering a nested guest Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 48/66] KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Emulate the HW bit in software Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 49/66] KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Allow userland to set VGIC maintenance IRQ Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 50/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement maintenance interrupt forwarding Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 51/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested GICv3 tracepoints Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 52/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow userspace to request KVM_ARM_VCPU_NESTED_VIRT Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 53/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of ARMv8.4-TTL TLB invalidation Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 54/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Invalidate TLBs based on shadow S2 TTL-like information Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 55/66] KVM: arm64: Allow populating S2 SW bits Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 56/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Tag shadow S2 entries with nested level Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 57/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add include containing the VNCR_EL2 offsets Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 58/66] KVM: arm64: Map VNCR-capable registers to a separate page Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 59/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Move nested vgic state into the sysreg file Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 60/66] KVM: arm64: Add ARMv8.4 Enhanced Nested Virt cpufeature Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 61/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Synchronize PSTATE early on exit Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 62/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Sync nested timer state with ARMv8.4 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 63/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate VNCR page when required Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-21  2:47   ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-21  2:47     ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-21  2:47     ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-16 19:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-16 19:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-16 19:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 64/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Enable ARMv8.4-NV support Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 65/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track 'InHost' exception returns Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 66/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track EL1 TLBIs for VHE guests Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 00/66] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Haibo Xu
2021-01-11  8:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11  8:59     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-11  8:59     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12  8:02     ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-12  8:02       ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-12  8:02       ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-18 17:38 ` André Przywara
2021-01-18 17:38   ` André Przywara
2021-01-18 17:38   ` André Przywara
2021-01-21  2:35 ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-21  3:03 ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-21  3:03   ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-21  3:03   ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-04  7:51   ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-04  7:51     ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-04  7:51     ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-17 22:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-17 22:10       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-17 22:10       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-23  9:43       ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-23  9:43         ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-23  9:43         ` Haibo Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210129180514.58d7a261@slackpad.fritz.box \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jintack.lim@linaro.org \
    --cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.