All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
@ 2021-02-19  9:59 ` frank.chang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-02-19  9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv
  Cc: Frank Chang, Alistair Francis, Palmer Dabbelt, Sagar Karandikar,
	Bastian Koppelmann

From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>

TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
rvv is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.h | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 02758ae0eb4..1b49eb9950b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -379,12 +379,13 @@ typedef CPURISCVState CPUArchState;
 typedef RISCVCPU ArchCPU;
 #include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 2, 1)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 3, 2)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 5, 3)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 8, 1)
+/* Skip mem_idx bits */
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
 /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)
 
 bool riscv_cpu_is_32bit(CPURISCVState *env);
 
-- 
2.17.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
@ 2021-02-19  9:59 ` frank.chang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: frank.chang @ 2021-02-19  9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv
  Cc: Frank Chang, Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Sagar Karandikar,
	Bastian Koppelmann

From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>

TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
rvv is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.h | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 02758ae0eb4..1b49eb9950b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -379,12 +379,13 @@ typedef CPURISCVState CPUArchState;
 typedef RISCVCPU ArchCPU;
 #include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 2, 1)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 3, 2)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 5, 3)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 8, 1)
+/* Skip mem_idx bits */
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
 /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)
 
 bool riscv_cpu_is_32bit(CPURISCVState *env);
 
-- 
2.17.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
  2021-02-19  9:59 ` frank.chang
@ 2021-02-19 16:11   ` Richard Henderson
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2021-02-19 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frank.chang, qemu-devel, qemu-riscv
  Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Sagar Karandikar, Bastian Koppelmann

On 2/19/21 1:59 AM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> +/* Skip mem_idx bits */
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)

Why not just add the mem_idx field to the list?

The separation between the FIELDs and TB_FLAG_*_MASK is unfortunate, and will
be a continuing source of errors.


r~


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
@ 2021-02-19 16:11   ` Richard Henderson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2021-02-19 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: frank.chang, qemu-devel, qemu-riscv
  Cc: Alistair Francis, Palmer Dabbelt, Sagar Karandikar, Bastian Koppelmann

On 2/19/21 1:59 AM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> +/* Skip mem_idx bits */
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)

Why not just add the mem_idx field to the list?

The separation between the FIELDs and TB_FLAG_*_MASK is unfortunate, and will
be a continuing source of errors.


r~


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
  2021-02-19 16:11   ` Richard Henderson
@ 2021-02-20  5:14     ` Frank Chang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Chang @ 2021-02-20  5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Henderson
  Cc: open list:RISC-V, Sagar Karandikar, Bastian Koppelmann,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers, Alistair Francis,
	Palmer Dabbelt

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 478 bytes --]

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:12 AM Richard Henderson <
richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 2/19/21 1:59 AM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> > +/* Skip mem_idx bits */
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
>
> Why not just add the mem_idx field to the list?
>
> The separation between the FIELDs and TB_FLAG_*_MASK is unfortunate, and
> will
> be a continuing source of errors.
>
>
Sure, I will edit it and send out the next version patch.

Thanks,
Frank Chang


>
> r~
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1045 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
@ 2021-02-20  5:14     ` Frank Chang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Chang @ 2021-02-20  5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Henderson
  Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers, open list:RISC-V,
	Alistair Francis, Palmer Dabbelt, Sagar Karandikar,
	Bastian Koppelmann

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 478 bytes --]

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:12 AM Richard Henderson <
richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 2/19/21 1:59 AM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> > +/* Skip mem_idx bits */
> > +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
>
> Why not just add the mem_idx field to the list?
>
> The separation between the FIELDs and TB_FLAG_*_MASK is unfortunate, and
> will
> be a continuing source of errors.
>
>
Sure, I will edit it and send out the next version patch.

Thanks,
Frank Chang


>
> r~
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1045 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-20  5:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-19  9:59 [PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh frank.chang
2021-02-19  9:59 ` frank.chang
2021-02-19 16:11 ` Richard Henderson
2021-02-19 16:11   ` Richard Henderson
2021-02-20  5:14   ` Frank Chang
2021-02-20  5:14     ` Frank Chang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.