Re: [RFT PATCH v3 06/27] dt-bindings: timer: arm,arch_timer: Add interrupt-names support

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 06:38:41AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> Not all platforms provide the same set of timers/interrupts, and Linux
> only needs one (plus kvm/guest ones); some platforms are working around
> this by using dummy fake interrupts. Implementing interrupt-names allows
> the devicetree to specify an arbitrary set of available interrupts, so
> the timer code can pick the right one.
> 
> This also adds the hyp-virt timer/interrupt, which was previously not
> expressed in the fixed 4-interrupt form.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/timer/arm,arch_timer.yaml  | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/arm,arch_timer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/arm,arch_timer.yaml
> index 2c75105c1398..ebe9b0bebe41 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/arm,arch_timer.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/arm,arch_timer.yaml
> @@ -34,11 +34,25 @@ properties:
>                - arm,armv8-timer
>  
>    interrupts:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 5
>      items:
>        - description: secure timer irq
>        - description: non-secure timer irq
>        - description: virtual timer irq
>        - description: hypervisor timer irq
> +      - description: hypervisor virtual timer irq
> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 5
> +    items:
> +      enum:
> +        - phys-secure
> +        - phys
> +        - virt
> +        - hyp-phys
> +        - hyp-virt

phys-secure and hyp-phys is not very consistent. secure-phys or sec-phys 
instead?

This allows any order which is not ideal (unfortunately json-schema 
doesn't have a way to define order with optional entries in the middle). 
How many possible combinations are there which make sense? If that's a 
reasonable number, I'd rather see them listed out.

Rob