From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:12:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422101236.GB1039@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2dbpwqn.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:56:16PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100,
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > The perf_num_counters() function is only defined when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> > is enabled:
> >
> > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c: In function 'kvm_perf_init':
> > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters'; did you mean 'dec_mm_counter'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 58 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Use conditional compilation to disable this feature entirely when
> > CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is disabled in the host.
> >
> > Fixes: 6b5b368fccd7 ("KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > Not sure if this is the correct symbol to check for, but this is
> > one way to avoid the build failure.
>
> I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
> see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
> the whole series in (nudge nudge...).
Sorry, behind at the moment! Will get to it today.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:12:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422101236.GB1039@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2dbpwqn.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:56:16PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100,
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > The perf_num_counters() function is only defined when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> > is enabled:
> >
> > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c: In function 'kvm_perf_init':
> > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters'; did you mean 'dec_mm_counter'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 58 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Use conditional compilation to disable this feature entirely when
> > CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is disabled in the host.
> >
> > Fixes: 6b5b368fccd7 ("KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > Not sure if this is the correct symbol to check for, but this is
> > one way to avoid the build failure.
>
> I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
> see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
> the whole series in (nudge nudge...).
Sorry, behind at the moment! Will get to it today.
Will
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:12:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422101236.GB1039@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2dbpwqn.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:56:16PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100,
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > The perf_num_counters() function is only defined when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> > is enabled:
> >
> > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c: In function 'kvm_perf_init':
> > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters'; did you mean 'dec_mm_counter'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 58 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Use conditional compilation to disable this feature entirely when
> > CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is disabled in the host.
> >
> > Fixes: 6b5b368fccd7 ("KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > Not sure if this is the correct symbol to check for, but this is
> > one way to avoid the build failure.
>
> I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
> see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
> the whole series in (nudge nudge...).
Sorry, behind at the moment! Will get to it today.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 13:49 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 13:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-21 13:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-21 13:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-21 14:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 14:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 14:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-22 10:12 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-04-22 10:12 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:12 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210422101236.GB1039@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=ascull@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.