From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:28:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a26F1+9XJqHtqO5S0dwTjBhV8Z+0J1r_D69y9h84qyY7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2dbpwqn.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
> see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
> the whole series in (nudge nudge...).
Makes sense. I like your diffstat, too.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:28:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a26F1+9XJqHtqO5S0dwTjBhV8Z+0J1r_D69y9h84qyY7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2dbpwqn.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
> see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
> the whole series in (nudge nudge...).
Makes sense. I like your diffstat, too.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:28:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a26F1+9XJqHtqO5S0dwTjBhV8Z+0J1r_D69y9h84qyY7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2dbpwqn.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely,
> see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take
> the whole series in (nudge nudge...).
Makes sense. I like your diffstat, too.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 13:49 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: build perf support only when enabled Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 13:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-21 13:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-21 13:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-21 14:28 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-04-21 14:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-21 14:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-04-22 10:12 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:12 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 10:12 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a26F1+9XJqHtqO5S0dwTjBhV8Z+0J1r_D69y9h84qyY7g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=ascull@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.