All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:28:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512102802.307861cb@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 761 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

between commit:

  e7c6e405e171 ("Fix misc new gcc warnings")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  c6deb5e97ded ("drm/i915/pm: Make the wm parameter of print_wm_latency a pointer")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:28:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512102802.307861cb@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 761 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

between commit:

  e7c6e405e171 ("Fix misc new gcc warnings")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  c6deb5e97ded ("drm/i915/pm: Make the wm parameter of print_wm_latency a pointer")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:28:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512102802.307861cb@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 761 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

between commit:

  e7c6e405e171 ("Fix misc new gcc warnings")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  c6deb5e97ded ("drm/i915/pm: Make the wm parameter of print_wm_latency a pointer")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12  0:28 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2021-05-12  0:28 ` [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-12  0:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-09  0:22 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-09  0:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22  0:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22  1:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22  1:10   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-06 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-06 23:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-13 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-13 23:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-14  8:19 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14  8:19   ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 10:10   ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-14 10:10     ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-14 10:35     ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 10:35       ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 11:02       ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-14 11:02         ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-17 22:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-17 22:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05  1:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05  0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05  0:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:39 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:33 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-02 15:29 Mark Brown
2021-05-20  0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-20  0:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-21  1:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-21  1:45   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08  4:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08  4:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08  8:22 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-08  8:22   ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-08 11:04   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 11:04     ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 13:20     ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-08 13:20       ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-23  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-23  1:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22  2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22  2:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23  0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23  0:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-19  1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-16  0:38 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-16  0:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-08  2:08 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-08  2:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31  1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31  1:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-31  1:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22  1:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-19  0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-19  0:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29  1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-29  1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-17  0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-17  0:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-09  1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-09  1:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-29  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-29  1:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-08  4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-08  4:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18  2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18  2:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-13  0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-13  0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18  1:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-18  1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-26  3:54 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-26  3:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  3:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  3:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21  1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21  1:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-07  1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-07  1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-07  8:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-05-07  8:43   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-05-08  0:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-08  0:11     ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03  2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03  2:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-03  8:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02  2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-02  2:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-04 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-04 23:23 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210512102802.307861cb@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jason@jlekstrand.net \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.