* Re: [meta-ti][dunfell/master][PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Added DTC_FLAG to Kernel argument to build dtbs with symbols
[not found] <20210514012143.7094-1-yogeshs@ti.com>
@ 2021-05-14 16:18 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <167EFB30FCA6D486.24136@lists.yoctoproject.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2021-05-14 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yogesh Siraswar; +Cc: meta-ti, denys, praneeth
On 20:21-20210513, Yogesh Siraswar wrote:
> Added DTC_FLAG (-@) to individual MACHINE configuration to compile dtbs with symbols.
> This fixes the issue where the dtbs are build without symbols causing issue with overlays
70 characters wrap please.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@ti.com>
> ---
> conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/am335x-hs-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/am437x-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/am437x-hs-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/am57xx-evm.conf | 8 ++++++++
> conf/machine/am57xx-hs-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/am65xx-evm.conf | 8 ++++++++
> conf/machine/am65xx-hs-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/dra7xx-evm.conf | 11 +++++++++++
> conf/machine/dra7xx-hs-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/j7-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/j7-hs-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/j7200-evm.conf | 10 ++++++++++
> conf/machine/k2g-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> conf/machine/k2g-hs-evm.conf | 9 +++++++++
> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb | 2 +-
how about mainline?
> 16 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf b/conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf
> index 469c4d37..dc50e686 100644
> --- a/conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf
> +++ b/conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf
> @@ -13,6 +13,15 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES += "ubifs ubi"
> SERIAL_CONSOLES = "115200;ttyS0 115200;ttyS3"
> SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK = "${SERIAL_CONSOLES}"
>
> +#Add DTC_FLAGS to compile DTB with symbols.
> +#Weak assignment so that can be over-written with
> +#EXTRA_DTC_FLAGS = "" in local.conf
We dont need this comment every where, do we?
> +
> +EXTRA_DTC_FLAGS ?= "DTC_FLAGS=-@"
> +
> +KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS += "${EXTRA_DTC_FLAGS}"
Should'nt this be in a common file
[...]
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> index 4ec19af7..ee5e6fa1 100644
> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ SRCREV = "d85aee3e19aa7403bd157d2ae30917e736096a7f"
> PV = "5.10.30+git${SRCPV}"
>
> # Append to the MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so that a new SRCREV will cause a rebuild
> -MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "a"
> +MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "b"
> PR = "${MACHINE_KERNEL_PR}"
>
I wonder if this comes here.
KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS += "${EXTRA_DTC_FLAGS}"
> KERNEL_GIT_URI = "git://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel.git"
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-ti][dunfell/master][PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Added DTC_FLAG to Kernel argument to build dtbs with symbols
[not found] ` <167EFB30FCA6D486.24136@lists.yoctoproject.org>
@ 2021-05-14 19:26 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2021-05-14 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yogesh Siraswar, meta-ti, denys, praneeth
On 11:18-20210514, Nishanth Menon via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> On 20:21-20210513, Yogesh Siraswar wrote:
[...]
>
> > 16 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf b/conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf
> > index 469c4d37..dc50e686 100644
> > --- a/conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf
> > +++ b/conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf
> > @@ -13,6 +13,15 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES += "ubifs ubi"
> > SERIAL_CONSOLES = "115200;ttyS0 115200;ttyS3"
> > SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK = "${SERIAL_CONSOLES}"
> >
> > +#Add DTC_FLAGS to compile DTB with symbols.
> > +#Weak assignment so that can be over-written with
> > +#EXTRA_DTC_FLAGS = "" in local.conf
>
> We dont need this comment every where, do we?
> > +
> > +EXTRA_DTC_FLAGS ?= "DTC_FLAGS=-@"
> > +
> > +KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS += "${EXTRA_DTC_FLAGS}"
>
> Should'nt this be in a common file
> [...]
Thinking again - should we make this a little easier in case the future
dtc needs more flags?
a) KERNEL_HAS_OVERLAYS as a single variable defined in machine.confs
b) ti-kernel.inc which introduces KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS in the style above
(extra_dtc_flags...)
c) include ti-kernel.inc in mainline-linux and linux-ti-staging?
[...]
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-14 19:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210514012143.7094-1-yogeshs@ti.com>
2021-05-14 16:18 ` [meta-ti][dunfell/master][PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Added DTC_FLAG to Kernel argument to build dtbs with symbols Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <167EFB30FCA6D486.24136@lists.yoctoproject.org>
2021-05-14 19:26 ` Nishanth Menon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.