All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] i915: fix remap_io_sg to verify the pgprot
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:23:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210518132333.GC2617@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <976fb38a-7780-6ca6-d602-a5f02c0938c9@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:46:35PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Apart from the caching aliasing Mattew brought up, doesn't the 
> remap_pfn_range_xxx() family require the mmap_sem held in write mode since 
> it modifies the vma structure? remap_io_sg() is called from the fault 
> handler with the mmap_sem held in read mode only.

Only for vma->vm_flags, and remap_sg already asserts all the interesting
flags are set, although it does not assert VM_IO.

We could move the assignment out of remap_pfn_range_notrack and
into remap_pfn_range and just assert that the proper flags are set,
though.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] i915: fix remap_io_sg to verify the pgprot
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:23:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210518132333.GC2617@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <976fb38a-7780-6ca6-d602-a5f02c0938c9@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:46:35PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Apart from the caching aliasing Mattew brought up, doesn't the 
> remap_pfn_range_xxx() family require the mmap_sem held in write mode since 
> it modifies the vma structure? remap_io_sg() is called from the fault 
> handler with the mmap_sem held in read mode only.

Only for vma->vm_flags, and remap_sg already asserts all the interesting
flags are set, although it does not assert VM_IO.

We could move the assignment out of remap_pfn_range_notrack and
into remap_pfn_range and just assert that the proper flags are set,
though.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26  5:55 add remap_pfn_range_notrack instead of reinventing it in i915 v2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: add a io_mapping_map_user helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-20 15:40   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-10-20 19:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-21  6:18       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] i915: use io_mapping_map_user Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] i915: fix remap_io_sg to verify the pgprot Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26  5:55   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-08 19:33   ` youling257
2021-05-08 19:33     ` youling257
2021-05-08 19:33     ` youling257
2021-05-10  8:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-10  8:58       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-16 16:06   ` Serge Belyshev
2021-05-16 16:06     ` [Intel-gfx] " Serge Belyshev
2021-05-16 16:06     ` Serge Belyshev
2021-05-17 12:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 12:37       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 13:09       ` Serge Belyshev
2021-05-17 13:09         ` [Intel-gfx] " Serge Belyshev
2021-05-17 13:09         ` Serge Belyshev
2021-05-17 13:11         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 13:11           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 17:06           ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-17 17:06             ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-17 17:06             ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-18 13:21             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 13:21               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 15:00               ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-18 15:00                 ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-18 15:00                 ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-19  5:46                 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-05-19  5:46                   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-05-17 21:46           ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-17 21:46             ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-17 21:46             ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18  6:46             ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18  6:46               ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18  6:46               ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18 13:24               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 13:24                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 13:33                 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18 13:33                   ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18 13:33                   ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-18 13:23             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-05-18 13:23               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19  5:51               ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-19  5:51                 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-05-19  5:51                 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-03-26  7:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack Patchwork
2021-03-26  7:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-26  7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-26  7:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-04-08 10:36 ` add remap_pfn_range_notrack instead of reinventing it in i915 v2 Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 10:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 10:36   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-08 11:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-08 11:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210518132333.GC2617@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.