All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	grant.likely@arm.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	tfiga@chromium.org, bskeggs@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, daniel@ffwll.ch, airlied@linux.ie,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, jxgao@google.com,
	joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 08:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210614062613.GI28343@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210611152659.2142983-10-tientzu@chromium.org>

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:54PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new function, release_slots, to make the code reusable for supporting
> different bounce buffer pools, e.g. restricted DMA pool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
> ---
>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 364c6c822063..a6562573f090 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -554,27 +554,15 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
>  	return tlb_addr;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
> - */
> -void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> -			      size_t mapping_size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			      unsigned long attrs)
> +static void release_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr)
>  {
> -	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = hwdev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
> +	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(hwdev, tlb_addr);
> +	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, tlb_addr);
>  	int index = (tlb_addr - offset - mem->start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>  	int nslots = nr_slots(mem->slots[index].alloc_size + offset);
>  	int count, i;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry
> -	 */
> -	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> -	    (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> -		swiotlb_bounce(hwdev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Return the buffer to the free list by setting the corresponding
>  	 * entries to indicate the number of contiguous entries available.
> @@ -609,6 +597,23 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
> + */
> +void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> +			      size_t mapping_size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> +			      unsigned long attrs)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry
> +	 */
> +	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> +	    (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> +		swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> +	release_slots(dev, tlb_addr);

Can you give this a swiotlb_ prefix?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	jxgao@google.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	tfiga@chromium.org,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 08:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210614062613.GI28343@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210611152659.2142983-10-tientzu@chromium.org>

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:54PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new function, release_slots, to make the code reusable for supporting
> different bounce buffer pools, e.g. restricted DMA pool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
> ---
>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 364c6c822063..a6562573f090 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -554,27 +554,15 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
>  	return tlb_addr;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
> - */
> -void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> -			      size_t mapping_size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			      unsigned long attrs)
> +static void release_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr)
>  {
> -	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = hwdev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
> +	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(hwdev, tlb_addr);
> +	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, tlb_addr);
>  	int index = (tlb_addr - offset - mem->start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>  	int nslots = nr_slots(mem->slots[index].alloc_size + offset);
>  	int count, i;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry
> -	 */
> -	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> -	    (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> -		swiotlb_bounce(hwdev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Return the buffer to the free list by setting the corresponding
>  	 * entries to indicate the number of contiguous entries available.
> @@ -609,6 +597,23 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
> + */
> +void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> +			      size_t mapping_size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> +			      unsigned long attrs)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry
> +	 */
> +	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> +	    (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> +		swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> +	release_slots(dev, tlb_addr);

Can you give this a swiotlb_ prefix?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
	grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, sstabellini@kernel.org,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	jxgao@google.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 08:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210614062613.GI28343@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210611152659.2142983-10-tientzu@chromium.org>

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:54PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new function, release_slots, to make the code reusable for supporting
> different bounce buffer pools, e.g. restricted DMA pool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
> ---
>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 364c6c822063..a6562573f090 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -554,27 +554,15 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
>  	return tlb_addr;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
> - */
> -void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> -			      size_t mapping_size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			      unsigned long attrs)
> +static void release_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr)
>  {
> -	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = hwdev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
> +	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(hwdev, tlb_addr);
> +	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, tlb_addr);
>  	int index = (tlb_addr - offset - mem->start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>  	int nslots = nr_slots(mem->slots[index].alloc_size + offset);
>  	int count, i;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry
> -	 */
> -	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> -	    (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> -		swiotlb_bounce(hwdev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Return the buffer to the free list by setting the corresponding
>  	 * entries to indicate the number of contiguous entries available.
> @@ -609,6 +597,23 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
> + */
> +void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> +			      size_t mapping_size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> +			      unsigned long attrs)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry
> +	 */
> +	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> +	    (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> +		swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> +	release_slots(dev, tlb_addr);

Can you give this a swiotlb_ prefix?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	jxgao@google.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	bhelgaas@google.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	tfiga@chromium.org,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 09/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 08:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210614062613.GI28343@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210611152659.2142983-10-tientzu@chromium.org>

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:54PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new function, release_slots, to make the code reusable for supporting
> different bounce buffer pools, e.g. restricted DMA pool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
> ---
>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 364c6c822063..a6562573f090 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -554,27 +554,15 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
>  	return tlb_addr;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
> - */
> -void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> -			      size_t mapping_size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			      unsigned long attrs)
> +static void release_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr)
>  {
> -	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = hwdev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
> +	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(hwdev, tlb_addr);
> +	unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, tlb_addr);
>  	int index = (tlb_addr - offset - mem->start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>  	int nslots = nr_slots(mem->slots[index].alloc_size + offset);
>  	int count, i;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry
> -	 */
> -	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> -	    (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> -		swiotlb_bounce(hwdev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Return the buffer to the free list by setting the corresponding
>  	 * entries to indicate the number of contiguous entries available.
> @@ -609,6 +597,23 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
> + */
> +void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> +			      size_t mapping_size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> +			      unsigned long attrs)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry
> +	 */
> +	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> +	    (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> +		swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> +	release_slots(dev, tlb_addr);

Can you give this a swiotlb_ prefix?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-14  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-11 15:26 [PATCH v9 00/14] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 01/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:16     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15  4:06     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-15  4:06       ` Claire Chang
2021-06-15  4:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-15  4:06       ` Claire Chang
2021-06-15  4:06       ` Claire Chang
2021-06-15  4:06       ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 02/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:17     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 03/14] swiotlb: Set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem to the swiotlb pool used Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:33   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:33     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:33     ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:33     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:33     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:33     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:20       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 04/14] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 05/14] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 06/14] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:34   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:34     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:34     ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:34     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:34     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:34     ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:23     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 07/14] swiotlb: Bounce data from/to restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 08/14] swiotlb: Move alloc_size to find_slots Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 09/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:26   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-06-14  6:26     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 10/14] dma-direct: Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 11/14] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-14  6:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:28       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-14  6:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 12/14] dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 13/14] dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 14/14] of: Add plumbing for " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 15:26   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-11 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Restricted DMA Patchwork
2021-06-15 13:30 ` [PATCH v9 00/14] " Claire Chang
2021-06-15 13:30   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-15 13:30   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-06-15 13:30   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-15 13:30   ` Claire Chang
2021-06-15 13:30   ` Claire Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210614062613.GI28343@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jxgao@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tientzu@chromium.org \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.