From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> To: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf arm-spe: Snapshot mode test Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:13:39 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20211020131339.GG49614@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210916154635.1525-5-german.gomez@arm.com> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:46:35PM +0100, German Gomez wrote: > Shell script test_arm_spe.sh has been added to test the recording of SPE > tracing events in snapshot mode. > > Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> > --- > tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 000000000000..9ed817e76f95 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > +# Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples > + > +# Uses the 'perf record' to record trace data of Arm SPE events; > +# then verify if any SPE event samples are generated by SPE with > +# 'perf script' and 'perf report' commands. > + > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +# German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, 2021 > + > +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event() { > + perf list | egrep -q 'arm_spe_[0-9]+//' && return 0 > + > + # arm_spe event doesn't exist > + return 2 > +} > + > +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event || exit 2 > + > +perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX) > +glb_err=0 > + > +cleanup_files() > +{ > + rm -f ${perfdata} > + trap - exit term int > + kill -2 $$ # Forward sigint to parent I understand you copy this code from Arm cs-etm testing, but I found the sentence 'kill -2 $$' will cause a failure at my side with the command: root@ubuntu:/home/leoy/linux/tools/perf# ./perf test 85 -v 85: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : --- start --- test child forked, pid 29053 Recording trace with snapshot mode /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.uughb Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples: Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples: SPE snapshot testing: PASS test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples: FAILED! I changed to use below code and looks it works for me: if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then kill -SIGINT $$ fi if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then kill -SIGTERM $$ fi Thanks, Leo > + exit $glb_err > +} > + > +trap cleanup_files exit term int > + > +arm_spe_report() { > + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then > + echo "$1: FAIL" > + glb_err=$2 > + else > + echo "$1: PASS" > + fi > +} > + > +perf_script_samples() { > + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:" > + > + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events() > + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)" > + > + # Below is an example of the samples dumping: > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ > + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 > +} > + > +perf_report_samples() { > + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:" > + > + # Below is an example of the samples reporting: > + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr > + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv > + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp > + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ > + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 > +} > + > +arm_spe_snapshot_test() { > + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata" > + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \ > + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 & > + PERFPID=$! > + > + # Wait for perf program > + sleep 1 > + > + # Send signal to snapshot trace data > + kill -USR2 $PERFPID > + > + # Stop perf program > + kill $PERFPID > + wait $PERFPID > + > + perf_script_samples dd && > + perf_report_samples dd > + > + err=$? > + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err > +} > + > +arm_spe_snapshot_test > +exit $glb_err > \ No newline at end of file > -- > 2.17.1 >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> To: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf arm-spe: Snapshot mode test Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:13:39 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20211020131339.GG49614@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210916154635.1525-5-german.gomez@arm.com> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:46:35PM +0100, German Gomez wrote: > Shell script test_arm_spe.sh has been added to test the recording of SPE > tracing events in snapshot mode. > > Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> > --- > tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 000000000000..9ed817e76f95 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > +# Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples > + > +# Uses the 'perf record' to record trace data of Arm SPE events; > +# then verify if any SPE event samples are generated by SPE with > +# 'perf script' and 'perf report' commands. > + > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +# German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>, 2021 > + > +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event() { > + perf list | egrep -q 'arm_spe_[0-9]+//' && return 0 > + > + # arm_spe event doesn't exist > + return 2 > +} > + > +skip_if_no_arm_spe_event || exit 2 > + > +perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX) > +glb_err=0 > + > +cleanup_files() > +{ > + rm -f ${perfdata} > + trap - exit term int > + kill -2 $$ # Forward sigint to parent I understand you copy this code from Arm cs-etm testing, but I found the sentence 'kill -2 $$' will cause a failure at my side with the command: root@ubuntu:/home/leoy/linux/tools/perf# ./perf test 85 -v 85: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : --- start --- test child forked, pid 29053 Recording trace with snapshot mode /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.uughb Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples: Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples: SPE snapshot testing: PASS test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples: FAILED! I changed to use below code and looks it works for me: if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then kill -SIGINT $$ fi if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then kill -SIGTERM $$ fi Thanks, Leo > + exit $glb_err > +} > + > +trap cleanup_files exit term int > + > +arm_spe_report() { > + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then > + echo "$1: FAIL" > + glb_err=$2 > + else > + echo "$1: PASS" > + fi > +} > + > +perf_script_samples() { > + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:" > + > + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events() > + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)" > + > + # Below is an example of the samples dumping: > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so) > + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ > + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 > +} > + > +perf_report_samples() { > + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:" > + > + # Below is an example of the samples reporting: > + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr > + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv > + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp > + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ > + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 > +} > + > +arm_spe_snapshot_test() { > + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata" > + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \ > + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 & > + PERFPID=$! > + > + # Wait for perf program > + sleep 1 > + > + # Send signal to snapshot trace data > + kill -USR2 $PERFPID > + > + # Stop perf program > + kill $PERFPID > + wait $PERFPID > + > + perf_script_samples dd && > + perf_report_samples dd > + > + err=$? > + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err > +} > + > +arm_spe_snapshot_test > +exit $glb_err > \ No newline at end of file > -- > 2.17.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 13:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-09-16 15:46 [PATCH 1/5] perf cs-etm: Print size using consistent format German Gomez 2021-09-16 15:46 ` German Gomez 2021-09-16 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf arm-spe: " German Gomez 2021-09-16 15:46 ` German Gomez 2021-09-23 13:35 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-23 13:35 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-16 15:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf arm-spe: Add snapshot mode support German Gomez 2021-09-16 15:46 ` German Gomez 2021-10-20 12:48 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-20 12:48 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-16 15:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf arm-spe: Implement find_snapshot callback German Gomez 2021-09-16 15:46 ` German Gomez 2021-09-23 13:50 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-23 13:50 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-23 14:40 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-23 14:40 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-30 12:26 ` German Gomez 2021-09-30 12:26 ` German Gomez 2021-10-04 12:27 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-04 12:27 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-06 9:35 ` German Gomez 2021-10-06 9:35 ` German Gomez 2021-10-06 9:51 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-06 9:51 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-11 15:55 ` German Gomez 2021-10-11 15:55 ` German Gomez 2021-10-12 8:19 ` Will Deacon 2021-10-12 8:19 ` Will Deacon 2021-10-12 8:47 ` James Clark 2021-10-12 8:47 ` James Clark 2021-10-13 0:39 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-13 0:39 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-13 7:51 ` Will Deacon 2021-10-13 7:51 ` Will Deacon 2021-10-15 12:33 ` German Gomez 2021-10-15 12:33 ` German Gomez 2021-10-15 14:16 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-15 14:16 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-15 14:41 ` German Gomez 2021-10-15 14:41 ` German Gomez 2021-10-17 6:13 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-17 6:13 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-19 9:23 ` German Gomez 2021-10-19 9:23 ` German Gomez 2021-10-19 13:12 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-19 13:12 ` Leo Yan 2021-11-02 11:02 ` German Gomez 2021-11-02 11:02 ` German Gomez 2021-10-17 12:05 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-17 12:05 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-17 12:36 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-17 12:36 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-19 17:34 ` German Gomez 2021-10-19 17:34 ` German Gomez 2021-10-20 13:25 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-20 13:25 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-16 15:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf arm-spe: Snapshot mode test German Gomez 2021-09-16 15:46 ` German Gomez 2021-10-20 13:13 ` Leo Yan [this message] 2021-10-20 13:13 ` Leo Yan 2021-10-20 15:06 ` German Gomez 2021-10-20 15:06 ` German Gomez 2021-11-02 14:07 ` James Clark 2021-11-02 14:07 ` James Clark 2021-11-02 15:37 ` James Clark 2021-11-02 15:37 ` James Clark 2021-11-09 13:26 ` German Gomez 2021-11-09 13:26 ` German Gomez 2021-09-23 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf cs-etm: Print size using consistent format Leo Yan 2021-09-23 13:35 ` Leo Yan 2021-09-23 16:24 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-09-23 16:24 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-09-30 12:09 ` German Gomez 2021-09-30 12:09 ` German Gomez 2021-09-30 16:30 ` Mathieu Poirier 2021-09-30 16:30 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20211020131339.GG49614@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \ --to=leo.yan@linaro.org \ --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \ --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=german.gomez@arm.com \ --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \ --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \ --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.