All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: "Alexandru Ardelean" <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>,
	"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] iio: buffer-dma: Enable buffer write support
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:20:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211121142049.2d000c04@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115141925.60164-5-paul@crapouillou.net>

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:19:14 +0000
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> Adding write support to the buffer-dma code is easy - the write()
> function basically needs to do the exact same thing as the read()
> function: dequeue a block, read or write the data, enqueue the block
> when entirely processed.
> 
> Therefore, the iio_buffer_dma_read() and the new iio_buffer_dma_write()
> now both call a function iio_buffer_dma_io(), which will perform this
> task.
> 
> The .space_available() callback can return the exact same value as the
> .data_available() callback for input buffers, since in both cases we
> count the exact same thing (the number of bytes in each available
> block).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Hi Paul,

There are a few changes in here, such as the bytes_used value being set that
I'm not following the reasoning behind. More info on those?
Also good to provide something about those in this patch description.

Thanks,

Jonathan


> ---
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 75 +++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h               |  7 ++
>  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> index abac88f20104..eeeed6b2e0cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block(
>  	}
>  
>  	block->size = size;
> -	block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEQUEUED;
> +	block->bytes_used = size;
> +	block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE;

I don't know why these are here - some more info?

>  	block->queue = queue;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&block->head);
>  	kref_init(&block->kref);
> @@ -195,6 +196,18 @@ static void _iio_dma_buffer_block_done(struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
>  		block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE;
>  }
>  
> +static void iio_dma_buffer_queue_wake(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)
> +{
> +	__poll_t flags;
> +
> +	if (queue->buffer.direction == IIO_BUFFER_DIRECTION_IN)
> +		flags = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
> +	else
> +		flags = EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
> +
> +	wake_up_interruptible_poll(&queue->buffer.pollq, flags);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * iio_dma_buffer_block_done() - Indicate that a block has been completed
>   * @block: The completed block
> @@ -212,7 +225,7 @@ void iio_dma_buffer_block_done(struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->list_lock, flags);
>  
>  	iio_buffer_block_put_atomic(block);
> -	wake_up_interruptible_poll(&queue->buffer.pollq, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
> +	iio_dma_buffer_queue_wake(queue);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_block_done);
>  
> @@ -241,7 +254,7 @@ void iio_dma_buffer_block_list_abort(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->list_lock, flags);
>  
> -	wake_up_interruptible_poll(&queue->buffer.pollq, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
> +	iio_dma_buffer_queue_wake(queue);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_block_list_abort);
>  
> @@ -334,7 +347,8 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_request_update(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
>  			queue->fileio.blocks[i] = block;
>  		}
>  
> -		block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_QUEUED;
> +		if (queue->buffer.direction == IIO_BUFFER_DIRECTION_IN)
> +			block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_QUEUED;

Possibly worth a comment on the state being set here.  I figured it out, but might
save some brain cells in future if it's stated in the code.

>  	}
>  
>  out_unlock:
> @@ -467,20 +481,12 @@ static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_dequeue(
>  	return block;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * iio_dma_buffer_read() - DMA buffer read callback
> - * @buffer: Buffer to read form
> - * @n: Number of bytes to read
> - * @user_buffer: Userspace buffer to copy the data to
> - *
> - * Should be used as the read callback for iio_buffer_access_ops
> - * struct for DMA buffers.
> - */
> -int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> -	char __user *user_buffer)
> +static int iio_dma_buffer_io(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +			     size_t n, char __user *user_buffer, bool is_write)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = iio_buffer_to_queue(buffer);
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block;
> +	void *addr;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (n < buffer->bytes_per_datum)
> @@ -503,8 +509,13 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  	n = rounddown(n, buffer->bytes_per_datum);
>  	if (n > block->bytes_used - queue->fileio.pos)
>  		n = block->bytes_used - queue->fileio.pos;
> +	addr = block->vaddr + queue->fileio.pos;
>  
> -	if (copy_to_user(user_buffer, block->vaddr + queue->fileio.pos, n)) {
> +	if (is_write)
> +		ret = !!copy_from_user(addr, user_buffer, n);
> +	else
> +		ret = !!copy_to_user(user_buffer, addr, n);

What is the !! gaining us here?  We only care about == 0 vs != 0 so
forcing it to be 0 or 1 isn't useful.

> +	if (ret) {
>  		ret = -EFAULT;
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	}
> @@ -513,6 +524,7 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  
>  	if (queue->fileio.pos == block->bytes_used) {
>  		queue->fileio.active_block = NULL;
> +		block->bytes_used = block->size;

This seems to be a functional change that isn't called out in the patch description.

>  		iio_dma_buffer_enqueue(queue, block);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -523,8 +535,39 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * iio_dma_buffer_read() - DMA buffer read callback
> + * @buffer: Buffer to read form
> + * @n: Number of bytes to read
> + * @user_buffer: Userspace buffer to copy the data to
> + *
> + * Should be used as the read callback for iio_buffer_access_ops
> + * struct for DMA buffers.
> + */
> +int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> +	char __user *user_buffer)
> +{
> +	return iio_dma_buffer_io(buffer, n, user_buffer, false);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_read);
>  
> +/**
> + * iio_dma_buffer_write() - DMA buffer write callback
> + * @buffer: Buffer to read form
> + * @n: Number of bytes to read
> + * @user_buffer: Userspace buffer to copy the data from
> + *
> + * Should be used as the write callback for iio_buffer_access_ops
> + * struct for DMA buffers.
> + */
> +int iio_dma_buffer_write(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> +			 const char __user *user_buffer)
> +{
> +	return iio_dma_buffer_io(buffer, n, (__force char *)user_buffer, true);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_write);
> +
>  /**
>   * iio_dma_buffer_data_available() - DMA buffer data_available callback
>   * @buf: Buffer to check for data availability
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> index a65a005c4a19..09c07d5563c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  	char __user *user_buffer);
> +int iio_dma_buffer_write(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> +			 const char __user *user_buffer);
>  size_t iio_dma_buffer_data_available(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_set_bytes_per_datum(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t bpd);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_set_length(struct iio_buffer *buffer, unsigned int length);
> @@ -142,4 +144,9 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_init(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
>  void iio_dma_buffer_exit(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue);
>  void iio_dma_buffer_release(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue);
>  
> +static inline size_t iio_dma_buffer_space_available(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> +{
> +	return iio_dma_buffer_data_available(buffer);
> +}
> +
>  #endif


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Alexandru Ardelean" <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] iio: buffer-dma: Enable buffer write support
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:20:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211121142049.2d000c04@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115141925.60164-5-paul@crapouillou.net>

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:19:14 +0000
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> Adding write support to the buffer-dma code is easy - the write()
> function basically needs to do the exact same thing as the read()
> function: dequeue a block, read or write the data, enqueue the block
> when entirely processed.
> 
> Therefore, the iio_buffer_dma_read() and the new iio_buffer_dma_write()
> now both call a function iio_buffer_dma_io(), which will perform this
> task.
> 
> The .space_available() callback can return the exact same value as the
> .data_available() callback for input buffers, since in both cases we
> count the exact same thing (the number of bytes in each available
> block).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Hi Paul,

There are a few changes in here, such as the bytes_used value being set that
I'm not following the reasoning behind. More info on those?
Also good to provide something about those in this patch description.

Thanks,

Jonathan


> ---
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 75 +++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h               |  7 ++
>  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> index abac88f20104..eeeed6b2e0cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block(
>  	}
>  
>  	block->size = size;
> -	block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEQUEUED;
> +	block->bytes_used = size;
> +	block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE;

I don't know why these are here - some more info?

>  	block->queue = queue;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&block->head);
>  	kref_init(&block->kref);
> @@ -195,6 +196,18 @@ static void _iio_dma_buffer_block_done(struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
>  		block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE;
>  }
>  
> +static void iio_dma_buffer_queue_wake(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)
> +{
> +	__poll_t flags;
> +
> +	if (queue->buffer.direction == IIO_BUFFER_DIRECTION_IN)
> +		flags = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
> +	else
> +		flags = EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
> +
> +	wake_up_interruptible_poll(&queue->buffer.pollq, flags);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * iio_dma_buffer_block_done() - Indicate that a block has been completed
>   * @block: The completed block
> @@ -212,7 +225,7 @@ void iio_dma_buffer_block_done(struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->list_lock, flags);
>  
>  	iio_buffer_block_put_atomic(block);
> -	wake_up_interruptible_poll(&queue->buffer.pollq, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
> +	iio_dma_buffer_queue_wake(queue);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_block_done);
>  
> @@ -241,7 +254,7 @@ void iio_dma_buffer_block_list_abort(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->list_lock, flags);
>  
> -	wake_up_interruptible_poll(&queue->buffer.pollq, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
> +	iio_dma_buffer_queue_wake(queue);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_block_list_abort);
>  
> @@ -334,7 +347,8 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_request_update(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
>  			queue->fileio.blocks[i] = block;
>  		}
>  
> -		block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_QUEUED;
> +		if (queue->buffer.direction == IIO_BUFFER_DIRECTION_IN)
> +			block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_QUEUED;

Possibly worth a comment on the state being set here.  I figured it out, but might
save some brain cells in future if it's stated in the code.

>  	}
>  
>  out_unlock:
> @@ -467,20 +481,12 @@ static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_dequeue(
>  	return block;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * iio_dma_buffer_read() - DMA buffer read callback
> - * @buffer: Buffer to read form
> - * @n: Number of bytes to read
> - * @user_buffer: Userspace buffer to copy the data to
> - *
> - * Should be used as the read callback for iio_buffer_access_ops
> - * struct for DMA buffers.
> - */
> -int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> -	char __user *user_buffer)
> +static int iio_dma_buffer_io(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +			     size_t n, char __user *user_buffer, bool is_write)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = iio_buffer_to_queue(buffer);
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block;
> +	void *addr;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (n < buffer->bytes_per_datum)
> @@ -503,8 +509,13 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  	n = rounddown(n, buffer->bytes_per_datum);
>  	if (n > block->bytes_used - queue->fileio.pos)
>  		n = block->bytes_used - queue->fileio.pos;
> +	addr = block->vaddr + queue->fileio.pos;
>  
> -	if (copy_to_user(user_buffer, block->vaddr + queue->fileio.pos, n)) {
> +	if (is_write)
> +		ret = !!copy_from_user(addr, user_buffer, n);
> +	else
> +		ret = !!copy_to_user(user_buffer, addr, n);

What is the !! gaining us here?  We only care about == 0 vs != 0 so
forcing it to be 0 or 1 isn't useful.

> +	if (ret) {
>  		ret = -EFAULT;
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	}
> @@ -513,6 +524,7 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  
>  	if (queue->fileio.pos == block->bytes_used) {
>  		queue->fileio.active_block = NULL;
> +		block->bytes_used = block->size;

This seems to be a functional change that isn't called out in the patch description.

>  		iio_dma_buffer_enqueue(queue, block);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -523,8 +535,39 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * iio_dma_buffer_read() - DMA buffer read callback
> + * @buffer: Buffer to read form
> + * @n: Number of bytes to read
> + * @user_buffer: Userspace buffer to copy the data to
> + *
> + * Should be used as the read callback for iio_buffer_access_ops
> + * struct for DMA buffers.
> + */
> +int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> +	char __user *user_buffer)
> +{
> +	return iio_dma_buffer_io(buffer, n, user_buffer, false);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_read);
>  
> +/**
> + * iio_dma_buffer_write() - DMA buffer write callback
> + * @buffer: Buffer to read form
> + * @n: Number of bytes to read
> + * @user_buffer: Userspace buffer to copy the data from
> + *
> + * Should be used as the write callback for iio_buffer_access_ops
> + * struct for DMA buffers.
> + */
> +int iio_dma_buffer_write(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> +			 const char __user *user_buffer)
> +{
> +	return iio_dma_buffer_io(buffer, n, (__force char *)user_buffer, true);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_write);
> +
>  /**
>   * iio_dma_buffer_data_available() - DMA buffer data_available callback
>   * @buf: Buffer to check for data availability
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> index a65a005c4a19..09c07d5563c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  	char __user *user_buffer);
> +int iio_dma_buffer_write(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> +			 const char __user *user_buffer);
>  size_t iio_dma_buffer_data_available(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_set_bytes_per_datum(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t bpd);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_set_length(struct iio_buffer *buffer, unsigned int length);
> @@ -142,4 +144,9 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_init(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
>  void iio_dma_buffer_exit(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue);
>  void iio_dma_buffer_release(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue);
>  
> +static inline size_t iio_dma_buffer_space_available(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> +{
> +	return iio_dma_buffer_data_available(buffer);
> +}
> +
>  #endif


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-21 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-15 14:19 [PATCH 00/15] iio: buffer-dma: write() and new DMABUF based API Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19 ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 01/15] iio: buffer-dma: Get rid of incoming/outgoing queues Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16  8:23   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16  8:23     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-21 14:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 14:05     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 16:23   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-21 16:23     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-21 17:52     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 17:52       ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 18:49       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-21 18:49         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-21 20:08         ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 20:08           ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-22 15:08           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-22 15:08             ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-22 15:16             ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-22 15:16               ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-22 15:17               ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-22 15:17                 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-22 15:27                 ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-22 15:27                   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 02/15] iio: buffer-dma: Remove unused iio_buffer_block struct Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16  8:22   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16  8:22     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 03/15] iio: buffer-dma: Use round_down() instead of rounddown() Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16  8:26   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16  8:26     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-21 14:08   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 14:08     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-22 10:00     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-22 10:00       ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-27 15:15       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-27 15:15         ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 04/15] iio: buffer-dma: Enable buffer write support Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16  8:52   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16  8:52     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-21 14:20   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-11-21 14:20     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 17:19     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 17:19       ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-27 15:17       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-27 15:17         ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 05/15] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support specifying buffer direction Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16  8:53   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16  8:53     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 06/15] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Enable write support Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16  8:55   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16  8:55     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 07/15] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 14:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 14:31     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 08/15] iio: buffer-dma: split iio_dma_buffer_fileio_free() function Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16 10:59   ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16 10:59     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-21 13:49     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 13:49       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 09/15] iio: buffer-dma: Use DMABUFs instead of custom solution Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 10/15] iio: buffer-dma: Implement new DMABUF based userspace API Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19 ` [PATCH 11/15] iio: buffer-dma: Boost performance using write-combine cache setting Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:19   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-18 11:45   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-18 11:45     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 15:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 15:00     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 17:43     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 17:43       ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-25 17:29       ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-25 17:29         ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-27 16:05         ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-27 16:05           ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-28 13:25           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-28 13:25             ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-11-27 15:20       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-27 15:20         ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-15 14:22 ` [PATCH 12/15] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support new DMABUF based userspace API Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:22   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:22   ` [PATCH 13/15] iio: core: Add support for cyclic buffers Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:22     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16  9:50     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16  9:50       ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-15 14:22   ` [PATCH 14/15] iio: buffer-dmaengine: " Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:22     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16  9:50     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-16  9:50       ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-11-15 14:22   ` [PATCH 15/15] Documentation: iio: Document high-speed DMABUF based API Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:22     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 15:10     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 15:10       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 17:46       ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-21 17:46         ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:37 ` [PATCH 00/15] iio: buffer-dma: write() and new " Daniel Vetter
2021-11-15 14:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-11-15 14:57   ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-15 14:57     ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-16 16:02     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-11-16 16:02       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-11-16 16:31       ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-11-16 16:31         ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-11-17  8:48         ` Christian König
2021-11-17  8:48           ` Christian König
2021-11-17 12:50       ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-17 12:50         ` Paul Cercueil
2021-11-17 13:42         ` Hennerich, Michael
2021-11-17 13:42           ` Hennerich, Michael
2021-11-21 13:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-21 13:57   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211121142049.2d000c04@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.