All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add regulator support
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:44:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211220094435.GU6003@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211217130919.3035788-4-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:09:18PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> This patch allows to let a domain be supplied by a regulator which
> is needed for the GPU on the rk3568-EVB board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> +
> +	regulator_disable(pd->regulator);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int rockchip_pd_attach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> @@ -500,6 +517,11 @@ static int rockchip_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pd->info = pd_info;
>  	pd->pmu = pd_info->pmu;
>  
> +	pd->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "power");

I was told that I should use this function instead of
devm_regulator_get_optional() when the regulator is not optional and
also I can drop the if (pd->regulator) dance when enabling the regulator
because I get a dummy regulator here when using devm_regulator_get().

Well, all true and on one specific board the regulator is indeed not
optional. However, on all other power domains that don't need a
regulator and all other boards and all other SoCs this driver is used we
now get:

[    0.185588] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.8: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.186036] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.9: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.186459] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.10: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.187039] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.11: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.187333] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.13: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.187644] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.14: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.188042] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.15: supply power not found, using dummy regulator

I wonder if devm_regulator_get() is really the right function here. Or
should the message be dropped?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add regulator support
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:44:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211220094435.GU6003@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211217130919.3035788-4-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:09:18PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> This patch allows to let a domain be supplied by a regulator which
> is needed for the GPU on the rk3568-EVB board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> +
> +	regulator_disable(pd->regulator);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int rockchip_pd_attach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> @@ -500,6 +517,11 @@ static int rockchip_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pd->info = pd_info;
>  	pd->pmu = pd_info->pmu;
>  
> +	pd->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "power");

I was told that I should use this function instead of
devm_regulator_get_optional() when the regulator is not optional and
also I can drop the if (pd->regulator) dance when enabling the regulator
because I get a dummy regulator here when using devm_regulator_get().

Well, all true and on one specific board the regulator is indeed not
optional. However, on all other power domains that don't need a
regulator and all other boards and all other SoCs this driver is used we
now get:

[    0.185588] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.8: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.186036] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.9: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.186459] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.10: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.187039] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.11: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.187333] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.13: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.187644] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.14: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.188042] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.15: supply power not found, using dummy regulator

I wonder if devm_regulator_get() is really the right function here. Or
should the message be dropped?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-20  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17 13:09 [PATCH 0/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add regulator support Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: register device for each domain Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09   ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Use devm_clk_bulk_get_all() Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09   ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add regulator support Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09   ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-20  9:44   ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2021-12-20  9:44     ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-20 10:46     ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-20 10:46       ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-20 12:56       ` Mark Brown
2021-12-20 12:56         ` Mark Brown
2021-12-20 12:53     ` Mark Brown
2021-12-20 12:53       ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 10:40       ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-22 10:40         ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-22 12:54         ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-22 12:54           ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-22 13:00           ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 13:00             ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 13:19             ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-22 13:19               ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-22 13:25               ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 13:25                 ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 13:29                 ` Michael Riesch
2021-12-22 13:29                   ` Michael Riesch
2021-12-22 13:37                   ` Michael Riesch
2021-12-22 13:40                   ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 13:40                     ` Mark Brown
2022-02-23  8:51                     ` Michael Riesch
2022-02-23  8:51                       ` Michael Riesch
2021-12-17 13:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Add power-supply to domain nodes Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09   ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211220094435.GU6003@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.