All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] dma-buf-map: Add helper to initialize second map
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:59:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220127155913.vt7a74zmsglghzom@ldmartin-desk2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7a3fe1d-3b85-cb7e-19cf-1611ff4f3c9e@suse.de>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
>
>Am 26.01.22 um 21:36 schrieb Lucas De Marchi:
>>When dma_buf_map struct is passed around, it's useful to be able to
>>initialize a second map that takes care of reading/writing to an offset
>>of the original map.
>>
>>Add a helper that copies the struct and add the offset to the proper
>>address.
>>
>>Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
>>Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>>Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
>>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>---
>>  include/linux/dma-buf-map.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>>diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>index 65e927d9ce33..3514a859f628 100644
>>--- a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>+++ b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>@@ -131,6 +131,35 @@ struct dma_buf_map {
>>  		.is_iomem = false, \
>>  	}
>>+/**
>>+ * DMA_BUF_MAP_INIT_OFFSET - Initializes struct dma_buf_map from another dma_buf_map
>>+ * @map_:	The dma-buf mapping structure to copy from
>>+ * @offset:	Offset to add to the other mapping
>>+ *
>>+ * Initializes a new dma_buf_struct based on another. This is the equivalent of doing:
>>+ *
>>+ * .. code-block: c
>>+ *
>>+ *	dma_buf_map map = other_map;
>>+ *	dma_buf_map_incr(&map, &offset);
>>+ *
>>+ * Example usage:
>>+ *
>>+ * .. code-block: c
>>+ *
>>+ *	void foo(struct device *dev, struct dma_buf_map *base_map)
>>+ *	{
>>+ *		...
>>+ *		struct dma_buf_map = DMA_BUF_MAP_INIT_OFFSET(base_map, FIELD_OFFSET);
>>+ *		...
>>+ *	}
>>+ */
>>+#define DMA_BUF_MAP_INIT_OFFSET(map_, offset_)	(struct dma_buf_map)	\
>>+	{								\
>>+		.vaddr = (map_)->vaddr + (offset_),			\
>>+		.is_iomem = (map_)->is_iomem,				\
>>+	}
>>+
>
>It's illegal to access .vaddr  with raw pointer. Always use a 
>dma_buf_memcpy_() interface. So why would you need this macro when you 
>have dma_buf_memcpy_*() with an offset parameter?

I did a better job with an example in 20220127093332.wnkd2qy4tvwg5i5l@ldmartin-desk2

While doing this series I had code like this when using the API in a function to
parse/update part of the struct mapped:

	int bla_parse_foo(struct dma_buf_map *bla_map)
	{
		struct dma_buf_map foo_map = *bla_map;
		...

		dma_buf_map_incr(&foo_map, offsetof(struct bla, foo));

		...
	}

Pasting the rest of the reply here:

I had exactly this code above, but after writting quite a few patches
using it, particularly with functions that have to write to 2 maps (see
patch 6 for example), it felt much better to have something to
initialize correctly from the start

         struct dma_buf_map other_map = *bla_map;
         /* poor Lucas forgetting dma_buf_map_incr(map, offsetof(...)); */

is error prone and hard to debug since you will be reading/writting
from/to another location rather than exploding

While with the construct below

         other_map;
         ...
         other_map = INITIALIZER()

I can rely on the compiler complaining about uninitialized var. And
in most of the cases I can just have this single line in the beggining of the
function when the offset is constant:

         struct dma_buf_map other_map = INITIALIZER(bla_map, offsetof(..));


This is useful when you have several small functions in charge of
updating/reading inner struct members.

>
>I've also been very careful to distinguish between .vaddr and 
>.vaddr_iomem, even in places where I wouldn't have to. This macro 
>breaks the assumption.

That's one reason I think if we have this macro, it should be in the
dma_buf_map.h header (or whatever we rename these APIs to). It's the
only place where we can safely add code that relies on the implementation
of the "private" fields in struct dma_buf_map.

Lucas De Marchi

>
>Best regards
>Thomas
>
>>  /**
>>   * dma_buf_map_set_vaddr - Sets a dma-buf mapping structure to an address in system memory
>>   * @map:	The dma-buf mapping structure
>
>-- 
>Thomas Zimmermann
>Graphics Driver Developer
>SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] dma-buf-map: Add helper to initialize second map
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:59:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220127155913.vt7a74zmsglghzom@ldmartin-desk2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7a3fe1d-3b85-cb7e-19cf-1611ff4f3c9e@suse.de>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
>
>Am 26.01.22 um 21:36 schrieb Lucas De Marchi:
>>When dma_buf_map struct is passed around, it's useful to be able to
>>initialize a second map that takes care of reading/writing to an offset
>>of the original map.
>>
>>Add a helper that copies the struct and add the offset to the proper
>>address.
>>
>>Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
>>Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>>Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
>>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>---
>>  include/linux/dma-buf-map.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>>diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>index 65e927d9ce33..3514a859f628 100644
>>--- a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>+++ b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>@@ -131,6 +131,35 @@ struct dma_buf_map {
>>  		.is_iomem = false, \
>>  	}
>>+/**
>>+ * DMA_BUF_MAP_INIT_OFFSET - Initializes struct dma_buf_map from another dma_buf_map
>>+ * @map_:	The dma-buf mapping structure to copy from
>>+ * @offset:	Offset to add to the other mapping
>>+ *
>>+ * Initializes a new dma_buf_struct based on another. This is the equivalent of doing:
>>+ *
>>+ * .. code-block: c
>>+ *
>>+ *	dma_buf_map map = other_map;
>>+ *	dma_buf_map_incr(&map, &offset);
>>+ *
>>+ * Example usage:
>>+ *
>>+ * .. code-block: c
>>+ *
>>+ *	void foo(struct device *dev, struct dma_buf_map *base_map)
>>+ *	{
>>+ *		...
>>+ *		struct dma_buf_map = DMA_BUF_MAP_INIT_OFFSET(base_map, FIELD_OFFSET);
>>+ *		...
>>+ *	}
>>+ */
>>+#define DMA_BUF_MAP_INIT_OFFSET(map_, offset_)	(struct dma_buf_map)	\
>>+	{								\
>>+		.vaddr = (map_)->vaddr + (offset_),			\
>>+		.is_iomem = (map_)->is_iomem,				\
>>+	}
>>+
>
>It's illegal to access .vaddr  with raw pointer. Always use a 
>dma_buf_memcpy_() interface. So why would you need this macro when you 
>have dma_buf_memcpy_*() with an offset parameter?

I did a better job with an example in 20220127093332.wnkd2qy4tvwg5i5l@ldmartin-desk2

While doing this series I had code like this when using the API in a function to
parse/update part of the struct mapped:

	int bla_parse_foo(struct dma_buf_map *bla_map)
	{
		struct dma_buf_map foo_map = *bla_map;
		...

		dma_buf_map_incr(&foo_map, offsetof(struct bla, foo));

		...
	}

Pasting the rest of the reply here:

I had exactly this code above, but after writting quite a few patches
using it, particularly with functions that have to write to 2 maps (see
patch 6 for example), it felt much better to have something to
initialize correctly from the start

         struct dma_buf_map other_map = *bla_map;
         /* poor Lucas forgetting dma_buf_map_incr(map, offsetof(...)); */

is error prone and hard to debug since you will be reading/writting
from/to another location rather than exploding

While with the construct below

         other_map;
         ...
         other_map = INITIALIZER()

I can rely on the compiler complaining about uninitialized var. And
in most of the cases I can just have this single line in the beggining of the
function when the offset is constant:

         struct dma_buf_map other_map = INITIALIZER(bla_map, offsetof(..));


This is useful when you have several small functions in charge of
updating/reading inner struct members.

>
>I've also been very careful to distinguish between .vaddr and 
>.vaddr_iomem, even in places where I wouldn't have to. This macro 
>breaks the assumption.

That's one reason I think if we have this macro, it should be in the
dma_buf_map.h header (or whatever we rename these APIs to). It's the
only place where we can safely add code that relies on the implementation
of the "private" fields in struct dma_buf_map.

Lucas De Marchi

>
>Best regards
>Thomas
>
>>  /**
>>   * dma_buf_map_set_vaddr - Sets a dma-buf mapping structure to an address in system memory
>>   * @map:	The dma-buf mapping structure
>
>-- 
>Thomas Zimmermann
>Graphics Driver Developer
>SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev




  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-27 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 133+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-26 20:36 [PATCH 00/19] drm/i915/guc: Refactor ADS access to use dma_buf_map Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 01/19] dma-buf-map: Add read/write helpers Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  7:24   ` Christian König
2022-01-27  7:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-01-27  7:24     ` Christian König
2022-01-27  7:36     ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-27  7:36       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2022-01-27  7:36       ` Matthew Brost
2022-01-27  7:59       ` Christian König
2022-01-27  7:59         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-01-27  7:59         ` Christian König
2022-01-27  9:02         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27  9:02           ` Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27 14:26   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 14:26     ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 14:26     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 16:34     ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 16:34       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 16:34       ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-28  8:32       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-28  8:32         ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-28  8:32         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 02/19] dma-buf-map: Add helper to initialize second map Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  7:27   ` Christian König
2022-01-27  7:27     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-01-27  7:27     ` Christian König
2022-01-27  7:57     ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  7:57       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  7:57       ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  8:02       ` Christian König
2022-01-27  8:02         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-01-27  8:02         ` Christian König
2022-01-27  8:18         ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  8:55           ` Christian König
2022-01-27  9:12             ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  9:12               ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  9:21               ` Christian König
2022-01-27  9:21                 ` Christian König
2022-01-27  8:57         ` Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27  8:57           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27  8:57           ` Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27  9:33           ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 10:00             ` Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27 10:00               ` Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27 10:21               ` Christian König
2022-01-27 11:16                 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27 11:16                   ` Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27 11:44                   ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Christian König
2022-01-27 11:44                     ` [Intel-gfx] [Linaro-mm-sig] " Christian König
2022-01-27 11:56                     ` [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27 11:56                       ` Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27 11:56                       ` [Intel-gfx] [Linaro-mm-sig] " Daniel Vetter
2022-01-27 16:13                     ` [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 16:13                       ` [Intel-gfx] [Linaro-mm-sig] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 16:13                       ` [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 14:52                 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 16:12                 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 14:33   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 14:33     ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 14:33     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 15:59     ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2022-01-27 15:59       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-28  8:15       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-28  8:34         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915/gt: Add helper for shmem copy to dma_buf_map Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/guc: Keep dma_buf_map of ads_blob around Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/guc: Add read/write helpers for ADS blob Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert golden context init to dma_buf_map Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert policies update " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert engine record " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 09/19] dma-buf-map: Add wrapper over memset Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  7:28   ` Christian König
2022-01-27  7:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-01-27  7:28     ` Christian König
2022-01-27 14:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 14:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 14:54     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-27 15:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 15:38       ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27 15:47       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert guc_ads_private_data_reset to dma_buf_map Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert golden context prep " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/guc: Replace check for golden context size Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert mapping table to dma_buf_map Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert capture list " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/guc: Prepare for error propagation Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/guc: Use a single pass to calculate regset Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-27  0:29   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27  0:29     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27  0:29     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2022-01-27  2:02   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27  2:02     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27  2:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2022-01-27  2:02     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27  4:37   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27  4:37     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27  4:37     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2022-02-01 22:42   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2022-02-01 22:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2022-02-03 23:44     ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-03 23:44       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:37 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert guc_mmio_reg_state_init to dma_buf_map Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:37 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/guc: Convert __guc_ads_init " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:37 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/guc: Remove plain ads_blob pointer Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 20:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-01-26 23:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc: Refactor ADS access to use dma_buf_map Patchwork
2022-01-26 23:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-01-26 23:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-01-26 23:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2022-01-27  5:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220127155913.vt7a74zmsglghzom@ldmartin-desk2 \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.