[PATCH v2 0/5] binman: Improvements to FIT entry type

From: Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
	Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] binman: Improvements to FIT entry type
Date: Tue,  8 Feb 2022 01:08:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220207220809.4497-1-alpernebiyasak@gmail.com> (raw)

I've managed to build images like in doc/chromium/chainload.rst wtih
binman, but ran into an issue with entry expansion in FIT and worked on
it a bit. I also added SetImagePos() because that documentation asks for
precise placement of u-boot.bin inside the FIT and I felt like doing it
as an easier way to know the positions.

I would try to refactor and experiment with FIT things more, but I know
Simon's currently working on converting SPL_FIT_GENERATOR to binman.
Instead I'm just sending things I have already done with some tests
added, hopefully without too many conflicts.

Changes in v2:
- Split reused testSimpleFit code into a helper function
- Check missing_bintools list instead of catching Fdt exceptions
- Add tag: "Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>"

v1: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=284714

Alper Nebi Yasak (5):
  binman: Fix subentry expansion for FIT entry type
  binman: Register and check bintools from FIT subentries
  binman: Check missing bintools of Section subclasses
  binman: Convert FIT entry type to a subclass of Section entry type
  binman: Update image positions of FIT subentries

 tools/binman/etype/fit.py                     |  90 ++++++---
 tools/binman/etype/section.py                 |   1 +
 tools/binman/ftest.py                         | 171 +++++++++++++++++-
 .../binman/test/220_fit_subentry_bintool.dts  |  39 ++++
 4 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/binman/test/220_fit_subentry_bintool.dts

-- 
2.34.1