All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Add crtc .crtc_get_shared_dpll()
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:32:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220325123205.22140-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220325123205.22140-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Start splitting the .compute_crtc_clock() into two parts; one
part does the computation, the second part does the shared dpll
assignment. I want to move the actual computation part much earlier
into the compute_config() phase.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  4 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c    | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h    |  2 +
 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 7c68bc07c925..1b7bc764498c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -5003,6 +5003,10 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 		ret = intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(state, crtc);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
+
+		ret = intel_dpll_crtc_get_shared_dpll(state, crtc);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
index bc59efe18e89..2ee7255f3c36 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
 struct intel_dpll_funcs {
 	int (*crtc_compute_clock)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 				  struct intel_crtc *crtc);
+	int (*crtc_get_shared_dpll)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
+				    struct intel_crtc *crtc);
 };
 
 struct intel_limit {
@@ -930,6 +932,12 @@ static void i8xx_compute_dpll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 
 static int hsw_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 				  struct intel_crtc *crtc)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int hsw_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
+				    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
 	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
@@ -964,6 +972,12 @@ static int dg2_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 	return intel_mpllb_calc_state(crtc_state, encoder);
 }
 
+static int dg2_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
+				    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static bool ilk_needs_fb_cb_tune(const struct dpll *dpll, int factor)
 {
 	return dpll->m < factor * dpll->n;
@@ -1087,7 +1101,6 @@ static int ilk_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
 	const struct intel_limit *limit;
 	int refclk = 120000;
-	int ret;
 
 	/* CPU eDP is the only output that doesn't need a PCH PLL of its own. */
 	if (!crtc_state->has_pch_encoder)
@@ -1127,6 +1140,21 @@ static int ilk_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 	ilk_compute_dpll(crtc_state, &crtc_state->dpll,
 			 &crtc_state->dpll);
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ilk_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
+				    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
+		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
+	int ret;
+
+	/* CPU eDP is the only output that doesn't need a PCH PLL of its own. */
+	if (!crtc_state->has_pch_encoder)
+		return 0;
+
 	ret = intel_reserve_shared_dplls(state, crtc, NULL);
 	if (ret) {
 		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
@@ -1372,14 +1400,17 @@ static int i8xx_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 
 static const struct intel_dpll_funcs dg2_dpll_funcs = {
 	.crtc_compute_clock = dg2_crtc_compute_clock,
+	.crtc_get_shared_dpll = dg2_crtc_get_shared_dpll,
 };
 
 static const struct intel_dpll_funcs hsw_dpll_funcs = {
 	.crtc_compute_clock = hsw_crtc_compute_clock,
+	.crtc_get_shared_dpll = hsw_crtc_get_shared_dpll,
 };
 
 static const struct intel_dpll_funcs ilk_dpll_funcs = {
 	.crtc_compute_clock = ilk_crtc_compute_clock,
+	.crtc_get_shared_dpll = ilk_crtc_get_shared_dpll,
 };
 
 static const struct intel_dpll_funcs chv_dpll_funcs = {
@@ -1427,6 +1458,27 @@ int intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 	return i915->dpll_funcs->crtc_compute_clock(state, crtc);
 }
 
+int intel_dpll_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
+				    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
+		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
+
+	drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !intel_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state));
+
+	if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, crtc_state->shared_dpll))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!crtc_state->hw.enable)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!i915->dpll_funcs->crtc_get_shared_dpll)
+		return 0;
+
+	return i915->dpll_funcs->crtc_get_shared_dpll(state, crtc);
+}
+
 void
 intel_dpll_init_clock_hook(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h
index e9731b2dd01c..bbc30542f29f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ enum pipe;
 void intel_dpll_init_clock_hook(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 int intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 				  struct intel_crtc *crtc);
+int intel_dpll_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
+				    struct intel_crtc *crtc);
 int vlv_calc_dpll_params(int refclk, struct dpll *clock);
 int pnv_calc_dpll_params(int refclk, struct dpll *clock);
 int i9xx_calc_dpll_params(int refclk, struct dpll *clock);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-25 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-25 12:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations Ville Syrjala
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Make .get_dplls() return int Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 10:57   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Pass dev_priv to intel_shared_dpll_init() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 10:57   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Remove pointless dpll_funcs checks Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 10:59   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Adjust .crtc_compute_clock() calling convention Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:01   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Move stuff into intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:02   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Move the dpll_hw_state clearing to intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:05   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Clear the dpll_hw_state when disabling a pipe Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:06   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Split out dg2_crtc_compute_clock() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:07   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2022-03-28 11:10   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Add crtc .crtc_get_shared_dpll() Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Split shared dpll .get_dplls() into compute and get phases Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:18   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Do .crtc_compute_clock() earlier Ville Syrjala
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Clean up DPLL related debugs Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Reassign DPLLs only for crtcs going throug .compute_config() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-25 14:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations Patchwork
2022-03-25 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-25 14:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-25 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-03-29 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-29 13:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 13:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 13:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-03-30  1:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations (rev3) Patchwork
2022-03-30  1:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-30  1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-30  2:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-30  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-14  2:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations (rev4) Patchwork
2022-04-14  2:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-14  2:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-21 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations (rev5) Patchwork
2022-04-21 17:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-21 21:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220325123205.22140-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.