All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Move the dpll_hw_state clearing to intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock()
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:05:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mthafibn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220325123205.22140-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> All .crtc_compute_clock() implementations do the same memset() to
> clear the dpll_hw_state (since we preserve it across
> intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state()). Move the memset() to the common
> wrapper.
>
> Also clear it when we're about disable the pipe. Previously
> it looks like we just left the old junk in there.

Looks like you split this part to a separate patch. Which is good. Apart
from the stale commit message. ;)

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c     | 24 +++----------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 15 ------------
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> index 88d78a585304..494a343850e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> @@ -1081,9 +1081,6 @@ static int ilk_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	int refclk = 120000;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	/* CPU eDP is the only output that doesn't need a PCH PLL of its own. */
>  	if (!crtc_state->has_pch_encoder)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1177,9 +1174,6 @@ static int chv_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_limit *limit = &intel_limits_chv;
>  	int refclk = 100000;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	if (!crtc_state->clock_set &&
>  	    !chv_find_best_dpll(limit, crtc_state, crtc_state->port_clock,
>  				refclk, NULL, &crtc_state->dpll)) {
> @@ -1201,9 +1195,6 @@ static int vlv_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_limit *limit = &intel_limits_vlv;
>  	int refclk = 100000;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	if (!crtc_state->clock_set &&
>  	    !vlv_find_best_dpll(limit, crtc_state, crtc_state->port_clock,
>  				refclk, NULL, &crtc_state->dpll)) {
> @@ -1225,9 +1216,6 @@ static int g4x_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_limit *limit;
>  	int refclk = 96000;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
>  		if (intel_panel_use_ssc(dev_priv)) {
>  			refclk = dev_priv->vbt.lvds_ssc_freq;
> @@ -1273,9 +1261,6 @@ static int pnv_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_limit *limit;
>  	int refclk = 96000;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
>  		if (intel_panel_use_ssc(dev_priv)) {
>  			refclk = dev_priv->vbt.lvds_ssc_freq;
> @@ -1312,9 +1297,6 @@ static int i9xx_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_limit *limit;
>  	int refclk = 96000;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
>  		if (intel_panel_use_ssc(dev_priv)) {
>  			refclk = dev_priv->vbt.lvds_ssc_freq;
> @@ -1351,9 +1333,6 @@ static int i8xx_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_limit *limit;
>  	int refclk = 48000;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
>  		if (intel_panel_use_ssc(dev_priv)) {
>  			refclk = dev_priv->vbt.lvds_ssc_freq;
> @@ -1430,6 +1409,9 @@ int intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	if (!crtc_state->hw.enable)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> +	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> +
>  	return i915->dpll_funcs->crtc_compute_clock(state, crtc);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index dc3c889b0aa6..22f55574a35c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -1068,9 +1068,6 @@ static int hsw_get_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>  	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = NULL;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI))
>  		pll = hsw_ddi_wrpll_get_dpll(state, crtc);
>  	else if (intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(crtc_state))
> @@ -1595,9 +1592,6 @@ static int skl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  		DPLL_CFGCR2_PDIV(wrpll_params.pdiv) |
>  		wrpll_params.central_freq;
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.ctrl1 = ctrl1;
>  	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cfgcr1 = cfgcr1;
>  	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cfgcr2 = cfgcr2;
> @@ -1708,9 +1702,6 @@ skl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -	       sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.ctrl1 = ctrl1;
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -2139,8 +2130,6 @@ static int bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	u32 prop_coef, int_coef, gain_ctl, targ_cnt;
>  	u32 lanestagger;
>  
> -	memset(dpll_hw_state, 0, sizeof(*dpll_hw_state));
> -
>  	if (vco >= 6200000 && vco <= 6700000) {
>  		prop_coef = 4;
>  		int_coef = 9;
> @@ -2701,8 +2690,6 @@ static void icl_calc_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  {
>  	u32 dco_fraction = pll_params->dco_fraction;
>  
> -	memset(pll_state, 0, sizeof(*pll_state));
> -
>  	if (ehl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(i915))
>  		dco_fraction = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dco_fraction, 2);
>  
> @@ -2820,8 +2807,6 @@ static int icl_calc_mg_pll_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	bool is_dkl = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	memset(pll_state, 0, sizeof(*pll_state));
> -
>  	ret = icl_mg_pll_find_divisors(clock, is_dp, use_ssc, &dco_khz,
>  				       pll_state, is_dkl);
>  	if (ret) {

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-28 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-25 12:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations Ville Syrjala
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Make .get_dplls() return int Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 10:57   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Pass dev_priv to intel_shared_dpll_init() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 10:57   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Remove pointless dpll_funcs checks Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 10:59   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Adjust .crtc_compute_clock() calling convention Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:01   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Move stuff into intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:02   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Move the dpll_hw_state clearing to intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:05   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-03-25 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Clear the dpll_hw_state when disabling a pipe Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:06   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Split out dg2_crtc_compute_clock() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:07   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Add crtc .crtc_get_shared_dpll() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:10   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Split shared dpll .get_dplls() into compute and get phases Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:18   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Do .crtc_compute_clock() earlier Ville Syrjala
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Clean up DPLL related debugs Ville Syrjala
2022-03-28 11:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-25 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Reassign DPLLs only for crtcs going throug .compute_config() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-25 14:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations Patchwork
2022-03-25 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-25 14:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-25 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-03-29 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-29 13:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 13:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 13:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-03-30  1:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations (rev3) Patchwork
2022-03-30  1:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-30  1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-30  2:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-30  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-14  2:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations (rev4) Patchwork
2022-04-14  2:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-04-14  2:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-21 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Start reordering modeset clock calculations (rev5) Patchwork
2022-04-21 17:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-04-21 21:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mthafibn.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.