Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: wwan: t7xx: fix GFP_KERNEL usage in spin_lock context

* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: wwan: t7xx: fix GFP_KERNEL usage in spin_lock context
  2022-05-19  7:43 [PATCH net-next v3] net: wwan: t7xx: fix GFP_KERNEL usage in spin_lock context Ziyang Xuan
@ 2022-05-19  7:29 ` Loic Poulain
  2022-05-21  0:25   ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Loic Poulain @ 2022-05-19  7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ziyang Xuan
  Cc: chandrashekar.devegowda, linuxwwan, chiranjeevi.rapolu,
	haijun.liu, m.chetan.kumar, ricardo.martinez, ryazanov.s.a,
	johannes, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, netdev

On Thu, 19 May 2022 at 09:26, Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq() call t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb() in spin_lock
> context, But __dev_alloc_skb() in t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb() uses
> GFP_KERNEL, that will introduce scheduling factor in spin_lock context.
>
> Because t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq() is called after stopping CLDMA, so we can
> remove the spin_lock from t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq().
>
> Fixes: 39d439047f1d ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface")
> Suggested-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>

> ---
>  drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> ---
> v3:
>   - Add Suggested-by and simplify comments
> v2:
>   - Remove spin_lock instead of using GFP_ATOMIC
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c
> index 46066dcd2607..3a46a5bea24f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c
> @@ -782,10 +782,11 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, int qnum)
>         struct cldma_queue *rxq = &md_ctrl->rxq[qnum];
>         struct cldma_request *req;
>         struct cldma_gpd *gpd;
> -       unsigned long flags;
>         int ret = 0;
>
> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&rxq->ring_lock, flags);
> +       /* CLDMA has been stopped. There is not any CLDMA IRQ, holding
> +        * ring_lock is not needed.
> +        */
>         t7xx_cldma_q_reset(rxq);
>         list_for_each_entry(req, &rxq->tr_ring->gpd_ring, entry) {
>                 gpd = req->gpd;
> @@ -808,7 +809,6 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, int qnum)
>
>                 t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_data_ptr(req->gpd, req->mapped_buff);
>         }
> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rxq->ring_lock, flags);
>
>         return ret;
>  }
> --
> 2.25.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread