All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	shakeelb@google.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	longman@redhat.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:05:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524060551.80037-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524060551.80037-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

If we reuse the objcg APIs to charge LRU pages, the folio_memcg()
can be changed when the LRU pages reparented. In this case, we need
to acquire the new lruvec lock.

    lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);

    // The page is reparented.

    compact_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, &flags, cc);

    // Acquired the wrong lruvec lock and need to retry.

But compact_lock_irqsave() only take lruvec lock as the parameter,
we cannot aware this change. If it can take the page as parameter
to acquire the lruvec lock. When the page memcg is changed, we can
use the folio_memcg() detect whether we need to reacquire the new
lruvec lock. So compact_lock_irqsave() is not suitable for us.
Similar to folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(), introduce
compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave() to acquire the lruvec lock in
the compaction routine.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/compaction.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index fe915db6149b..817098817302 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -509,6 +509,29 @@ static bool compact_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static struct lruvec *
+compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(struct folio *folio, unsigned long *flags,
+				  struct compact_control *cc)
+{
+	struct lruvec *lruvec;
+
+	lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
+
+	/* Track if the lock is contended in async mode */
+	if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC && !cc->contended) {
+		if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags))
+			goto out;
+
+		cc->contended = true;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags);
+out:
+	lruvec_memcg_debug(lruvec, folio);
+
+	return lruvec;
+}
+
 /*
  * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
  * very heavily contended. The lock should be periodically unlocked to avoid
@@ -844,6 +867,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 
 	/* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
 	for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
+		struct folio *folio;
 
 		if (skip_on_failure && low_pfn >= next_skip_pfn) {
 			/*
@@ -1065,18 +1089,17 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 		if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
 			goto isolate_fail_put;
 
-		lruvec = folio_lruvec(page_folio(page));
+		folio = page_folio(page);
+		lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
 
 		/* If we already hold the lock, we can skip some rechecking */
 		if (lruvec != locked) {
 			if (locked)
 				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 
-			compact_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, &flags, cc);
+			lruvec = compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(folio, &flags, cc);
 			locked = lruvec;
 
-			lruvec_memcg_debug(lruvec, page_folio(page));
-
 			/* Try get exclusive access under lock */
 			if (!skip_updated) {
 				skip_updated = true;
-- 
2.11.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
To: hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	roman.gushchin-fxUVXftIFDnyG1zEObXtfA@public.gmane.org,
	shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	duanxiongchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org,
	longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:05:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524060551.80037-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524060551.80037-1-songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>

If we reuse the objcg APIs to charge LRU pages, the folio_memcg()
can be changed when the LRU pages reparented. In this case, we need
to acquire the new lruvec lock.

    lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);

    // The page is reparented.

    compact_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, &flags, cc);

    // Acquired the wrong lruvec lock and need to retry.

But compact_lock_irqsave() only take lruvec lock as the parameter,
we cannot aware this change. If it can take the page as parameter
to acquire the lruvec lock. When the page memcg is changed, we can
use the folio_memcg() detect whether we need to reacquire the new
lruvec lock. So compact_lock_irqsave() is not suitable for us.
Similar to folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(), introduce
compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave() to acquire the lruvec lock in
the compaction routine.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
---
 mm/compaction.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index fe915db6149b..817098817302 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -509,6 +509,29 @@ static bool compact_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static struct lruvec *
+compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(struct folio *folio, unsigned long *flags,
+				  struct compact_control *cc)
+{
+	struct lruvec *lruvec;
+
+	lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
+
+	/* Track if the lock is contended in async mode */
+	if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC && !cc->contended) {
+		if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags))
+			goto out;
+
+		cc->contended = true;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags);
+out:
+	lruvec_memcg_debug(lruvec, folio);
+
+	return lruvec;
+}
+
 /*
  * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
  * very heavily contended. The lock should be periodically unlocked to avoid
@@ -844,6 +867,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 
 	/* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
 	for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
+		struct folio *folio;
 
 		if (skip_on_failure && low_pfn >= next_skip_pfn) {
 			/*
@@ -1065,18 +1089,17 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 		if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
 			goto isolate_fail_put;
 
-		lruvec = folio_lruvec(page_folio(page));
+		folio = page_folio(page);
+		lruvec = folio_lruvec(folio);
 
 		/* If we already hold the lock, we can skip some rechecking */
 		if (lruvec != locked) {
 			if (locked)
 				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 
-			compact_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, &flags, cc);
+			lruvec = compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave(folio, &flags, cc);
 			locked = lruvec;
 
-			lruvec_memcg_debug(lruvec, page_folio(page));
-
 			/* Try get exclusive access under lock */
 			if (!skip_updated) {
 				skip_updated = true;
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-24  6:05 [PATCH v4 00/11] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:01   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:01     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25  8:46     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  8:46       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  2:36   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  2:36     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  7:57     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  7:57       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 12:37       ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 12:37         ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 13:08         ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 13:08           ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2022-05-24  6:05   ` [PATCH v4 02/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:22   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:22     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25  9:38     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  9:38       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] mm: memcontrol: make lruvec lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:23   ` Waiman Long
2022-05-25 10:20     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 10:20       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 14:59       ` Waiman Long
2022-05-25 14:59         ` Waiman Long
2022-05-24 19:27   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:27     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25  9:53     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  9:53       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 12:30       ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 12:30         ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 13:03         ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 13:03           ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 14:48           ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 14:48             ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 15:38             ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 15:38               ` Muchun Song
2022-05-26 20:17               ` Waiman Long
2022-05-26 20:17                 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-27  2:55                 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-27  2:55                   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] mm: vmscan: rework move_pages_to_lru() Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:38   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:38     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 11:38     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:38       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:52   ` Waiman Long
2022-05-24 19:52     ` Waiman Long
2022-05-25 11:43     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:43       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  2:43   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  2:43     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:41     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:41       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock{_irqsave}() Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  2:54   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  2:54     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:44     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:44       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] mm: memcontrol: make all the callers of {folio,page}_memcg() safe Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  3:03   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  3:03     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:51     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:51       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 12:29   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 18:16   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 18:16     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-25  7:14   ` [mm] bec0ae1210: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2022-05-25  7:14     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] mm: lru: add VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO to lru maintenance function Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:44   ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 19:44     ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 11:59     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 11:59       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25  2:40   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25  2:40     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:58     ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes Muchun Song
2022-05-24  6:05   ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220524060551.80037-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.